|
Post by Singlemalt on Aug 28, 2017 7:00:46 GMT
Hahahaha at last! Indead spain, finland are good countries to chooce
|
|
|
Post by The Light Bringer on Aug 28, 2017 7:01:52 GMT
Conquest done. Now if you ask me 1939 USSR is not recommended. How about medals?
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Aug 28, 2017 7:02:02 GMT
How many turns in total?
|
|
|
Post by Singlemalt on Aug 28, 2017 7:02:46 GMT
166 its in screenshot
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Aug 28, 2017 7:05:43 GMT
I can't understand this system of rewards as well. What all these figures mean btw? 1 - 4770 173 - 8650
|
|
|
Post by best75 on Aug 28, 2017 7:05:46 GMT
Conquest done. Now if you ask me 1939 USSR is not recommended. How about medals? 50 from achievements
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Aug 28, 2017 7:12:47 GMT
Does this mean that if sometime in the future you make a decision to repeat this experience (I mean playing for USSR 1939) - there will be no more medals only resources as a reward?
|
|
|
Post by best75 on Aug 28, 2017 7:18:51 GMT
Does this mean that if sometime in the future you make a decision to repeat this experience (I mean playing for USSR 1939) - there will be no more medals only resources as a reward? Yes I believe so, also for any other 3 star 1939 country since achievement was for doing 1939 with a 3 star country.
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Aug 28, 2017 7:36:38 GMT
Do I understand correctly: 1 - 4770 You used one general (Auchinleck) and for that you received 4770 points. But for what - his mere presence or his performance?
And what does figure 173 mean?
|
|
|
Post by best75 on Aug 28, 2017 7:36:40 GMT
I chose the USSR for conquest because I expected it to be a easy and fast conquest. It had many generals and cities for good income. Has cities in europe and asia so I have reach in both fronts. Once europe was finished I thought I could quickly send troops to finish off japan. However the enemy proved to be more of a challenge than I expected.
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Aug 28, 2017 7:39:19 GMT
I chose the USSR for conquest because I expected it to be a easy and fast conquest. It had many generals and cities for good income. Has cities in europe and asia so I have reach in both fronts. Once europe was finished I thought I could quickly send troops to finish off japan. However the enemy proved to be more of a challenge than I expected. But how do you think: are there improvements of your game plan? What things are to be done different?
|
|
|
Post by best75 on Aug 28, 2017 7:39:39 GMT
Do I understand correctly: 1 - 4770 You used one general (Auchinleck) and for that you received 4770 points. But for what - his mere presence or his performance? And what does figure 173 mean? I cant figure out the reason for Auchinleck's points either. I believe the 173 means the number of times I conquered a city.
|
|
|
Post by best75 on Aug 28, 2017 7:48:11 GMT
I chose the USSR for conquest because I expected it to be a easy and fast conquest. It had many generals and cities for good income. Has cities in europe and asia so I have reach in both fronts. Once europe was finished I thought I could quickly send troops to finish off japan. However the enemy proved to be more of a challenge than I expected. But how do you think: are there improvements of your game plan? What things are to be done different? I think I did as well as I could since I seen worse results on this conquest. One thing I might have changed was not focus on building howitzers and focus on building something else. One thing of note is compared to WC3 heavy tanks now have a range of 2 instead of 1. This made howitzers weaker because many times they were able to get hit back by the heavy tanks. Also the reason the axis are much stronger because Germany starts the game with a lot of generals on heavy tanks.
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Aug 28, 2017 7:55:55 GMT
Maybe was it necessary to support China (or USA) with resources? Or are they doomed anyway?
|
|
|
Post by best75 on Aug 28, 2017 8:25:27 GMT
Maybe was it necessary to support China (or USA) with resources? Or are they doomed anyway? During the conquest I considered it too risky because our allies typically suck so thought they would not use the resource well. I also really needed the resource to use in my own campaign as well. Maybe I could have saved them but it came at too much of a risk of slowing my own campaign.
|
|