|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Oct 28, 2015 23:20:35 GMT
What should the next theoretical war be about?
If you have any additional scenarios please let me know.
|
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Oct 28, 2015 23:27:59 GMT
What will Empire Total War have?
|
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Oct 28, 2015 23:46:45 GMT
Maybe it's a free for all
|
|
|
|
Post by General William T. Sherman on Oct 29, 2015 0:04:48 GMT
I voted for Cold War. It would be interesting to have diplomacy involved as well, instead of just non stop war.
|
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Oct 29, 2015 0:08:20 GMT
My Idea:
16th century war
Asian Force 1: Ming
Ming Dynasty
Korea
Asian Force 2: Japan
Japan
European Force 1: Spain
Spain
Holy Roman Empire
France(Huguenot)
Portugal
Portugese India
European Force 2: France-Ottoman
France(Catholic)
Ottoman Turkey
England
American Colonies
Don't know which side:
Aztec
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Oct 29, 2015 2:27:19 GMT
What will Empire Total War have? It's like the game. You choose a nation in 1700 and just go ahead and conquer stuff. You're free to ally with however you want and you don't really have to stay realistic. |
|
|
|
Post by Vatutin on Oct 29, 2015 2:32:45 GMT
For Russia I chose the revolt
|
|
|
|
Post by best75 on Oct 29, 2015 2:50:36 GMT
World war 1. To break a stalemate
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Oct 29, 2015 2:56:51 GMT
My Idea: 16th century war Asian Force 1: Ming Ming Dynasty Korea Asian Force 2: Japan Japan European Force 1: Spain Spain Holy Roman Empire France(Huguenot) Portugal Portugese India European Force 2: France-Ottoman France(Catholic) Ottoman Turkey England American Colonies Don't know which side: Aztec The Azetcs would be independent Indians. |
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Oct 29, 2015 3:11:49 GMT
My Idea: 16th century war Asian Force 1: Ming Ming Dynasty Korea Asian Force 2: Japan Japan European Force 1: Spain Spain Holy Roman Empire France(Huguenot) Portugal Portugese India European Force 2: France-Ottoman France(Catholic) Ottoman Turkey England American Colonies Don't know which side: Aztec The Azetcs would be independent Indians. Yeah, but the problem is should the four forces against each other? Or an Asian force can be allied with an European one? |
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Oct 29, 2015 3:22:42 GMT
The Azetcs would be independent Indians. Yeah, but the problem is should the four forces against each other? Or an Asian force can be allied with an European one? In the 16th Century Japan closed itself from the rest of the world. So maybe not make a specific class for Japan and rather make a Native Americans one. |
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Oct 29, 2015 3:30:50 GMT
Yeah, but the problem is should the four forces against each other? Or an Asian force can be allied with an European one? In the 16th Century Japan closed itself from the rest of the world. So maybe not make a specific class for Japan and rather make a Native Americans one. Fine, but there should be two wars in the 16th century between Ming&Korea and Japan. |
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Oct 29, 2015 4:00:59 GMT
In the 16th Century Japan closed itself from the rest of the world. So maybe not make a specific class for Japan and rather make a Native Americans one. Fine, but there should be two wars in the 16th century between Ming&Korea and Japan. The actual war was in 1598 (the 2nd invasion of Korea and the bigger one) so that's somewhat realistic. |
|
|
|
Post by Legendary2K2005 on Oct 29, 2015 6:40:57 GMT
World War One because hell yass
|
|
|
|
Post by NetherFreek on Oct 29, 2015 6:57:54 GMT
maybe it's fun for number 5 if you have no war in the beginning, so no scenario, no sides (in the beginning), so that you create one scenario
|
|
