|
|
Post by Harry Lillis "Bing" Crosby Jr on Apr 11, 2020 16:29:35 GMT
Just a quick try: Who's better, Arnold or Timoshenko? Of course Arnold. Timoshenko is only good when there were no modern scenarios in WC4. In modern warfare, Timoshenko won't last long attacking in plains using tank. He doesn't even have blitzkrieg/AA/PanzLeader to begin with. As for Arnold, his main role is as an airforce officer and city defender (with his rumor). I know a lot of players like to exploit Arnold's rumor. But as for me, I hadn't bought Arnold until modern war, because I already equipped rumors on all of my generals. By the time I bought Arnold, almost all my generals already had lv4 rumor (lol). As for Timoshenko, he is not even good at being a tank/artillery general, only a fast moving but crackeble land general (due to his plain fighting which makes him tend to attack in plains without coverage). And Timoshenko doesn't have rumor at the beginning. As for Arnold's empty skill, I'd like to recommend the infamous crowd tactics on him. Note: at the beginning I was confused as you asked me to compare a tank and an air general. But I understand your question, you like to use Timoshenko and Arnold as support land generals right? However I don't recommend it. Give rumor on every generals you have and they will all be OP. Good, sound answer. This would be my reasoning too, Arnold indeed is the best support general if he is viewed in isolation as such |
|
|
|
Post by jibon on Apr 12, 2020 10:37:24 GMT
Jep, I would love to see more added in the future, such as skill recommendations. However I first need to set the foundation. I think we'll see what we need afterwards  I will review each purchasable HQ generals in depth + skill recommendations and analysis in each general discussion forums. I'm a general expert, you can ask me anything, and I'd like to help😄 Just another quick try, who is 2nd best (non IAP) artillery general after Konev? Leeb, Govorov or Zhang? |
|
|
|
Post by Harry Lillis "Bing" Crosby Jr on Apr 12, 2020 11:02:08 GMT
I will review each purchasable HQ generals in depth + skill recommendations and analysis in each general discussion forums. I'm a general expert, you can ask me anything, and I'd like to help😄 Just another quick try, who is 2nd best (non IAP) artillery general after Konev? Leeb, Govorov or Zhang? Leeb. Zhang is stifled, while Govorov is useful but sadly lacks artillery leader. |
|
|
|
Post by Sun Li-jen of the Glorious RoC on Apr 12, 2020 11:13:50 GMT
I will review each purchasable HQ generals in depth + skill recommendations and analysis in each general discussion forums. I'm a general expert, you can ask me anything, and I'd like to help😄 Just another quick try, who is 2nd best (non IAP) artillery general after Konev? Leeb, Govorov or Zhang? Of course Leeb, as he deals the most damage if maxed + accuracy (he has rumor too). Govorov is only good in the jungles and fort-cracking, while Zhang only good when counter attacking as his artillery leader is not that reliable. But if you are very fond of artilleries, I would recommend Govorov (or maybe Zhang) as your 3rd artillery (although not recommended) |
|
|
|
Post by Harry Lillis "Bing" Crosby Jr on Apr 12, 2020 13:02:27 GMT
Just another quick try, who is 2nd best (non IAP) artillery general after Konev? Leeb, Govorov or Zhang? Of course Leeb, as he deals the most damage if maxed + accuracy (he has rumor too). Govorov is only good in the jungles and fort-cracking, while Zhang only good when counter attacking as his artillery leader is not that reliable. But if you are very fond of artilleries, I would recommend Govorov (or maybe Zhang) as your 3rd artillery (although not recommended) Yep, govorov is a great 3rd general, not counting artillery supports |
|
erwinrommel23
Captain
In a man-to-man fight, the winner is he who has one more round in his magazine.
Posts: 125
|
Post by erwinrommel23 on Apr 13, 2020 16:44:43 GMT
Just another quick try, who is 2nd best (non IAP) artillery general after Konev? Leeb, Govorov or Zhang? Of course Leeb, as he deals the most damage if maxed + accuracy (he has rumor too). Govorov is only good in the jungles and fort-cracking, while Zhang only good when counter attacking as his artillery leader is not that reliable. But if you are very fond of artilleries, I would recommend Govorov (or maybe Zhang) as your 3rd artillery (although not recommended) when is montgomery a good general?? |
|
|
|
Post by Sun Li-jen of the Glorious RoC on Apr 13, 2020 16:48:15 GMT
Of course Leeb, as he deals the most damage if maxed + accuracy (he has rumor too). Govorov is only good in the jungles and fort-cracking, while Zhang only good when counter attacking as his artillery leader is not that reliable. But if you are very fond of artilleries, I would recommend Govorov (or maybe Zhang) as your 3rd artillery (although not recommended) when is montgomery a good general?? When he doesn't waste countless lives of British paratroopers for his own personal glory in operation market garden 😂 |
|
|
|
Post by Sun Li-jen of the Glorious RoC on Apr 13, 2020 16:49:43 GMT
Of course Leeb, as he deals the most damage if maxed + accuracy (he has rumor too). Govorov is only good in the jungles and fort-cracking, while Zhang only good when counter attacking as his artillery leader is not that reliable. But if you are very fond of artilleries, I would recommend Govorov (or maybe Zhang) as your 3rd artillery (although not recommended) when is montgomery a good general?? In the gameplay? When he is not used.. |
|
erwinrommel23
Captain
In a man-to-man fight, the winner is he who has one more round in his magazine.
Posts: 125
|
Post by erwinrommel23 on Apr 13, 2020 16:52:24 GMT
when is montgomery a good general?? In the gameplay? When he is not used.. Agreed, I rather use rommel and rokkosovosky as I have had amazing luck with them, |
|
|
|
Post by Sun Li-jen of the Glorious RoC on Apr 13, 2020 17:06:02 GMT
In the gameplay? When he is not used.. Agreed, I rather use rommel and rokkosovosky as I have had amazing luck with them, True, I've experimented him a lot using different set of skills: rumor + AA/blitzkrieg/machinist and I couldn't make him more useful than Rokossovsky in both survivability and damage output. I will do review about him soon. |
|
erwinrommel23
Captain
In a man-to-man fight, the winner is he who has one more round in his magazine.
Posts: 125
|
Post by erwinrommel23 on Apr 13, 2020 17:08:59 GMT
True, I've experimented him a lot using different set of skills: rumor + AA/blitzkrieg/machinist and I couldn't make him more useful than Rokossovsky in both survivability and damage output. I will do review about him soon. I at this point, like him as much as I like him in real life, not very good. |
|
|
|
Post by Sun Li-jen of the Glorious RoC on Apr 13, 2020 17:20:36 GMT
True, I've experimented him a lot using different set of skills: rumor + AA/blitzkrieg/machinist and I couldn't make him more useful than Rokossovsky in both survivability and damage output. I will do review about him soon. I at this point, like him as much as I like him in real life, not very good. Oh, by the way I am your Chinese version. Sun L.R. "Rommel of the East"😄 |
|
erwinrommel23
Captain
In a man-to-man fight, the winner is he who has one more round in his magazine.
Posts: 125
|
Post by erwinrommel23 on Apr 13, 2020 17:32:24 GMT
I at this point, like him as much as I like him in real life, not very good. Oh, by the way I am your Chinese version. Sun L.R. "Rommel of the East"😄 "Rommel of the east" XD. |
|
|
|
Post by Sun Li-jen of the Glorious RoC on Apr 13, 2020 17:34:10 GMT
Oh, by the way I am your Chinese version. Sun L.R. "Rommel of the East"😄 "Rommel of the east" XD. Yeah, that's what Europeans called me😁 |
|
erwinrommel23
Captain
In a man-to-man fight, the winner is he who has one more round in his magazine.
Posts: 125
|
Post by erwinrommel23 on Apr 13, 2020 17:45:44 GMT
Yeah, that's what Europeans called me😁 I love it |
|
