|
|
Post by Vatutin on Jan 29, 2018 21:36:25 GMT
Must say, sounds like redskins blood to me Giants fan lmao That’s works as well |
|
|
|
Post by Basilikon Agemos on Jan 29, 2018 21:59:56 GMT
NFL is rigged.
Tom Brady is the QB for 14 years.
Eagles had to go through Falcons and Vikings in order to go to the Superbowl against the Patriots... Patriots win.
Same old, same old.
|
|
|
|
Post by Desophaeus on Jan 29, 2018 23:16:59 GMT
NFL is rigged. Tom Brady is the QB for 14 years. Eagles had to go through Falcons and Vikings in order to go to the Superbowl against the Patriots... Patriots win. Same old, same old. The problem is the other QBs actually. In today's age, when a freshman QB is drafted, he's thrown into the fray pretty early. That works fine for RBs who would have an opportunity to shine, and the starter RB rarely ever complete all 16 games in a season without some injuries anyway. Really, everyone knows that young RBs > old RBs, but young QBs < old QBs. Pretty different roles. In the past... Tom Brady and Drew Brees (plus others like Dan Marino, Peyton Manning, etc) weren't even starters until at least a couple of years into the league. They had been given the opportunity to learn under a more experienced QB before they were allowed to take the helm, so to speak. If teams like the Browns continue to shove their QB draftees into the starter position, you won't see much improvement in the newer QBs in comparison to the old names of the NFL. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 30, 2018 2:14:03 GMT
NFL is rigged. Tom Brady is the QB for 14 years. Eagles had to go through Falcons and Vikings in order to go to the Superbowl against the Patriots... Patriots win. Same old, same old. The problem is the other QBs actually. In today's age, when a freshman QB is drafted, he's thrown into the fray pretty early. That works fine for RBs who would have an opportunity to shine, and the starter RB rarely ever complete all 16 games in a season without some injuries anyway. Really, everyone knows that young RBs > old RBs, but young QBs < old QBs. Pretty different roles. In the past... Tom Brady and Drew Brees (plus others like Dan Marino, Peyton Manning, etc) weren't even starters until at least a couple of years into the league. They had been given the opportunity to learn under a more experienced QB before they were allowed to take the helm, so to speak. If teams like the Browns continue to shove their QB draftees into the starter position, you won't see much improvement in the newer QBs in comparison to the old names of the NFL. Browns are like a junior team. I think one of those collage team can beat them. I don't follow collage football so i don't know what are the good teams |
|
|
|
Post by Desophaeus on Jan 30, 2018 4:20:08 GMT
The problem is the other QBs actually. In today's age, when a freshman QB is drafted, he's thrown into the fray pretty early. That works fine for RBs who would have an opportunity to shine, and the starter RB rarely ever complete all 16 games in a season without some injuries anyway. Really, everyone knows that young RBs > old RBs, but young QBs < old QBs. Pretty different roles. In the past... Tom Brady and Drew Brees (plus others like Dan Marino, Peyton Manning, etc) weren't even starters until at least a couple of years into the league. They had been given the opportunity to learn under a more experienced QB before they were allowed to take the helm, so to speak. If teams like the Browns continue to shove their QB draftees into the starter position, you won't see much improvement in the newer QBs in comparison to the old names of the NFL. Browns are like a junior team. I think one of those collage team can beat them. I don't follow collage football so i don't know what are the good teams In Ohio, because the Cleveland Browns are so horrible for 50 years in a row (breaking even 8-8 win/loss is tantamount to winning the Superbowl in terms of how rare it happens) and because the Ohio State University football team - the Buckeyes - do win very often against the best teams nationwide and is considered among the premier teams. The OSU vs Browns debate has been a very common topic for many years. College football is more popular in Ohio than NFL. I definitely can tell you that. |
|
|
|
Post by junius on Jan 30, 2018 9:59:46 GMT
The Cavs are going to make it to the Finals. As far as winning it all is concerned, he's got a shot- if he, Love, IT, and JR absolutely ball out. Long shot, sure, but very possible. Yeah, he has a slim hope if the people around him ball out. Which it just so happens they have been doing the polar opposite this season. Defense wins championships, and they have none. All 3 guys that LeBron has around him are having career lows everywhere and Kevin Love is heavily involved in trade rumors. The Cavs are a dysfunctional drama mill and they'll be lucky to make it to Warriors-Cavs IV. I know better than to count LeBron out completely, but I'd much rather see Celtics vs. Warriors. The Celtics will keep it fresh and competitive. If the Celtics make it to the Finals, they'll probably win as many games as I will sitting on my couch. The Cavs have this sort of mess every January, and IT's only played 10 games so far. Kevin Love and Bron of all people were putting up career numbers before the annual January slump. I like the Celtics, but I don't think Kyrie has enough scoring help (besides a 19 year old and 20 year old) to go more than 5 games with the Cavs, let alone the Warriors. Give Isaiah a couple of months to find his basketball legs, give TT and JR time to get out of their Funk (which they've been doing lately). Our starting five is not where it was last year, but at least the team doesn't go to the dogs when Bron takes a breather. Push comes to shove, the Bron + shooters lineup has been playing really well- that can take us to the Finals easily. Bron's just too good not to make it to the Finals; I'm done doubting legends. We were saying the same things last year. Our D was 29th in the league from the All-Star break to the end of the regular season, from there on it was 3rd. The Cleveland Brons gonna give you that D when it counts. |
|
|
|
Post by junius on Jan 30, 2018 10:02:37 GMT
NFL is rigged. Tom Brady is the QB for 14 years. Eagles had to go through Falcons and Vikings in order to go to the Superbowl against the Patriots... Patriots win. Same old, same old. The problem is the other QBs actually. In today's age, when a freshman QB is drafted, he's thrown into the fray pretty early. That works fine for RBs who would have an opportunity to shine, and the starter RB rarely ever complete all 16 games in a season without some injuries anyway. Really, everyone knows that young RBs > old RBs, but young QBs < old QBs. Pretty different roles. In the past... Tom Brady and Drew Brees (plus others like Dan Marino, Peyton Manning, etc) weren't even starters until at least a couple of years into the league. They had been given the opportunity to learn under a more experienced QB before they were allowed to take the helm, so to speak. If teams like the Browns continue to shove their QB draftees into the starter position, you won't see much improvement in the newer QBs in comparison to the old names of the NFL. This exactly. You need time to master the QB position- there's a reason why the best in the sport are at least 30+ (or better yet 35+, although iirc Russell Wilson and Cam Newton are exceptions). Since that just happens to be by far the most important position in the game, you're gonna see a lot of old guys dominate the sport. |
|
|
|
Post by junius on Jan 30, 2018 10:04:53 GMT
Browns are like a junior team. I think one of those collage team can beat them. I don't follow collage football so i don't know what are the good teams In Ohio, because the Cleveland Browns are so horrible for 50 years in a row (breaking even 8-8 win/loss is tantamount to winning the Superbowl in terms of how rare it happens) and because the Ohio State University football team - the Buckeyes - do win very often against the best teams nationwide and is considered among the premier teams. The OSU vs Browns debate has been a very common topic for many years. College football is more popular in Ohio than NFL. I definitely can tell you that. Even Nick Saban's teams have at best 15-20 NFL-caliber players. The Browns are horrible, but every single guy on that team can play in the NFL. It won't be particularly close, especially since most Bama players aren't even grown men yet. |
|
|
|
Post by junius on Jan 30, 2018 10:22:16 GMT
NFL is rigged. Tom Brady is the QB for 14 years. Eagles had to go through Falcons and Vikings in order to go to the Superbowl against the Patriots... Patriots win. Same old, same old. The problem is the other QBs actually. In today's age, when a freshman QB is drafted, he's thrown into the fray pretty early. That works fine for RBs who would have an opportunity to shine, and the starter RB rarely ever complete all 16 games in a season without some injuries anyway. Really, everyone knows that young RBs > old RBs, but young QBs < old QBs. Pretty different roles. In the past... Tom Brady and Drew Brees (plus others like Dan Marino, Peyton Manning, etc) weren't even starters until at least a couple of years into the league. They had been given the opportunity to learn under a more experienced QB before they were allowed to take the helm, so to speak. If teams like the Browns continue to shove their QB draftees into the starter position, you won't see much improvement in the newer QBs in comparison to the old names of the NFL. The Browns especially don't have any good RBs or WRs to put around their QB. Dak played well last year with Zeke and Dez and that offensive line, but took a couple of steps back when all 3 either missed time or regressed. Jared Goff went the other way when Todd Gurley, his receivers, and his O-line picked up their play this year. In fact most QBs not named Brady or Rodgers probably need good players around them to make it or go deep into the playoffs. We saw what good pieces would do even to a guy like Drew Brees (or a lack of them to Eli) this year, so I wouldn't knock Kizer too much for getting a bad team. |
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Jan 30, 2018 17:14:57 GMT
The problem is the other QBs actually. In today's age, when a freshman QB is drafted, he's thrown into the fray pretty early. That works fine for RBs who would have an opportunity to shine, and the starter RB rarely ever complete all 16 games in a season without some injuries anyway. Really, everyone knows that young RBs > old RBs, but young QBs < old QBs. Pretty different roles. In the past... Tom Brady and Drew Brees (plus others like Dan Marino, Peyton Manning, etc) weren't even starters until at least a couple of years into the league. They had been given the opportunity to learn under a more experienced QB before they were allowed to take the helm, so to speak. If teams like the Browns continue to shove their QB draftees into the starter position, you won't see much improvement in the newer QBs in comparison to the old names of the NFL. The Browns especially don't have any good RBs or WRs to put around their QB. Dak played well last year with Zeke and Dez and that offensive line, but took a couple of steps back when all 3 either missed time or regressed. Jared Goff went the other way when Todd Gurley, his receivers, and his O-line picked up their play this year. In fact most QBs not named Brady or Rodgers probably need good players around them to make it or go deep into the playoffs. We saw what good pieces would do even to a guy like Drew Brees (or a lack of them to Eli) this year, so I wouldn't knock Kizer too much for getting a bad team. Woah don't knock Drew Brees man hes a god. |
|
|
|
Post by junius on Jan 31, 2018 4:09:21 GMT
The Browns especially don't have any good RBs or WRs to put around their QB. Dak played well last year with Zeke and Dez and that offensive line, but took a couple of steps back when all 3 either missed time or regressed. Jared Goff went the other way when Todd Gurley, his receivers, and his O-line picked up their play this year. In fact most QBs not named Brady or Rodgers probably need good players around them to make it or go deep into the playoffs. We saw what good pieces would do even to a guy like Drew Brees (or a lack of them to Eli) this year, so I wouldn't knock Kizer too much for getting a bad team. Woah don't knock Drew Brees man hes a god. I totally agree man, but my point was that giving help makes him look like a supergod. The Saints probably had the best offense in the league this year between those backs, receivers, and Drew Brees. |
|
|
|
Post by GA Omar Bradley on Feb 2, 2018 7:13:49 GMT
Definitely the Patriots.
I bet they'll win the next 3 Super Bowls!
|
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Feb 5, 2018 0:32:38 GMT
GO PATROITS!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 5, 2018 0:34:43 GMT
Eagles since i get a 6 pack if they win
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 5, 2018 0:36:11 GMT
Eagles win i get 6 pack from our ceo of our company so it going to fun getting beer from oue boss. If pat win i get it a 6 pack |
|
