|
|
Post by Harry Lillis "Bing" Crosby Jr on Mar 31, 2020 13:35:02 GMT
Przede wszystkim więcej grywalnych krajów jak i pierwszą wojnę światową jak i aktualną mapę polityczną czyli 2020 rok. oraz żeby medale były łatwiejsze do zdobycia ponieważ są też gracze tacy jak ja którzy nie kupują tych medali. Welcome to the forum, and happy first post! This is what he said in Polish: "First of all, more playable countries as well as the First World War and the current political map, i.e. 2020. and make medals easier to win because there are players like me who don't buy these medals." I agree with your points, and indeed wc4 is a hard game to earn medals in... That aside, do try to communicate in English as well, since our forum is an international community that uses English as a base for interactions  Translated in Polish in case it is required: Poza tym staraj się również komunikować w języku angielskim, ponieważ nasze forum to międzynarodowa społeczność, która używa języka angielskiego jako podstawy do interakcji |
|
|
|
Post by Harry Lillis "Bing" Crosby Jr on Mar 31, 2020 13:35:32 GMT
Pardon me if my translation goes awry, I took it from Google Translate like any Plebeian would hahaha
|
|
|
|
Post by steelixir on Mar 31, 2020 23:19:36 GMT
I think that customizable generals should return. We should be able to rebattle those domination battles, because I want to see how my general lineup would affect my outcome or how easily I could win. More accurate map, of course. And no Bradley lol.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jeanne d'Arc on Apr 1, 2020 2:27:07 GMT
No Bradley would be a bit much, though he could have mediocrity be his bottom instead of his top.
|
|
|
|
Post by Harry Lillis "Bing" Crosby Jr on Apr 1, 2020 9:24:48 GMT
Then again wc4 updates are pretty unlikely, unfortunately
|
|
|
|
Post by tristanknight on Apr 8, 2020 14:06:11 GMT
Then again wc4 updates are pretty unlikely, unfortunately That's unfortunate, because they could do a lot of updating. For example they could add a pvp mode (maybe 1v1 or up to 6 players on a map, which would be 3v3). Personally I think that would add a lot more fun to the game. If there won't be a wc5, the next best thing is expanding in wc4. |
|
|
|
Post by Harry Lillis "Bing" Crosby Jr on Apr 8, 2020 14:18:49 GMT
Then again wc4 updates are pretty unlikely, unfortunately That's unfortunate, because they could do a lot of updating. For example they could add a pvp mode (maybe 1v1 or up to 6 players on a map, which would be 3v3). Personally I think that would add a lot more fun to the game. If there won't be a wc5, the next best thing is expanding in wc4. One way to see whether they are up to massive online multiplayer is to see what happens with ew6:1914. Currently they have a pretty useless ios local multiplayer (with the COVID19 situation it wont be a popular feature as well), but if they manage to expand that into something greater, we could potentially have that occurring for wc4/5 as well. Which is something huge to look forward to. |
|
|
|
Post by Gone on Apr 20, 2020 2:36:30 GMT
That's unfortunate, because they could do a lot of updating. For example they could add a pvp mode (maybe 1v1 or up to 6 players on a map, which would be 3v3). Personally I think that would add a lot more fun to the game. If there won't be a wc5, the next best thing is expanding in wc4. One way to see whether they are up to massive online multiplayer is to see what happens with ew6:1914. Currently they have a pretty useless ios local multiplayer (with the COVID19 situation it wont be a popular feature as well), but if they manage to expand that into something greater, we could potentially have that occurring for wc4/5 as well. Which is something huge to look forward to. This game is one of the best true mobile games out there and yet it’s largely unknown. Deserves so much more. |
|
|
|
Post by docdonk on May 17, 2020 17:38:21 GMT
Hmmm. PvP on a conquest map would be fun
|
|
|
|
Post by Darth Nihilus on May 18, 2020 15:23:46 GMT
I think a decent sandbox mode would be if you were able to control which countries are in which factions, give cities to different countries, etc. Or maybe even play as the opposite faction in campaigns.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sun Li-jen of the Glorious RoC on May 20, 2020 14:54:30 GMT
Hmmm. PvP on a conquest map would be fun Exactly what I've always wanted |
|
|
|
Post by Harry Lillis "Bing" Crosby Jr on May 21, 2020 2:33:48 GMT
It would be like ew6:1914 multiplayer, or even the old gog ones
|
|
|
|
Post by Darth Vader on May 21, 2020 2:40:00 GMT
It would be like ew6:1914 multiplayer, or even the old gog ones Imagine a conquest with more then one person! That's 30 people free for all in one conquest. It would be like men of war Assault squad. |
|
|
|
Post by Darth Nihilus on May 21, 2020 14:37:03 GMT
It would be like ew6:1914 multiplayer, or even the old gog ones Imagine a conquest with more then one person! That's 30 people free for all in one conquest. It would be like men of war Assault squad. Everybody gangsta until you're the kid who gets Belgium in 1939 and has to go up against someone who beat the game and has IAP generals. |
|
|
|
Post by edthebest on Jan 22, 2021 11:44:35 GMT
I would love to see different countries have different damage for different units. For example, UK has a better air force damage then germany but Germany has higher tank damage then Uk. Also maybe venture a bit into WW1 maybe for scenarios have 1917-18, 1939, 1943 etc and a same for conquests also something different from 1950 and 1980, maybe do a 21st century new world order or something.
|
|
