|
Post by leetowvorbeck on Feb 6, 2018 12:23:51 GMT
Well after clearing all the campaigns and conquest I can conclude that I absolutely hate facing Rokossovsky, Patton and Zhukov. They're a major obstacle in both campaigns and conquests while Guderian and Mainstein usually die silly deaths like trying to cross a sea or get bombed or nuked.
Can't wait to see all your opinions.
|
|
|
Post by odm on Feb 6, 2018 18:49:20 GMT
High level Rumor and lots of HP and it is already on my list. Still, I think the terro guys are the most hated, so you should add them too as choices
|
|
|
Post by leetowvorbeck on Feb 6, 2018 21:57:19 GMT
Alright, any suggestions in mind though, like any specific generals?
|
|
|
Post by best75 on Feb 7, 2018 2:50:08 GMT
For the terrorist campaign there is Osborn who always has a ton of HP and takes a few turns to kill. Mortita is also there, he's the only infantry general the terrorist have in the campaign but I seen his lvl 5 cover skill activate far too often.
|
|
|
Post by clausvonstauffenberg on Feb 7, 2018 5:13:06 GMT
Well after clearing all the campaigns and conquest I can conclude that I absolutely hate facing Rokossovsky, Patton and Zhukov. They're a major obstacle in both campaigns and conquests while Guderian and Mainstein usually die silly deaths like trying to cross a sea or get bombed or nuked. Can't wait to see all your opinions. I gotta admit. I hate facing Rokossovsky but Zhukov I hate even more. Lots of them are very overpowered.
|
|
|
Post by leetowvorbeck on Feb 7, 2018 8:37:04 GMT
For the terrorist campaign there is Osborn who always has a ton of HP and takes a few turns to kill. Mortita is also there, he's the only infantry general the terrorist have in the campaign but I seen his lvl 5 cover skill activate far too often. Want me to include Osborn in the polls?
|
|
|
Post by Nobunaga Oda on Feb 7, 2018 8:46:40 GMT
I agree on the terrorists point.
Second worst would be tank gens (high def = low nuke dmg), anyone you can't nuke in CWE & UN is always tough
|
|
|
Post by leetowvorbeck on Feb 7, 2018 8:56:25 GMT
I agree on the terrorists point. Second worst would be tank gens (high def = low nuke dmg), anyone you can't nuke in CWE & UN is always tough I got used to that because of 1950 and 1980 campaign. There all the starting units have high ranking, including the generals and the Generals themselves have upgraded health's. Also, lots of Super heavies and Super rockets.
|
|
|
Post by Max Otto von Stierlitz on Feb 7, 2018 15:59:05 GMT
Most annoying terrorists gen is scenarios is Coulson. He is on ship, has ship depot 4, ton of hp and in every scenario where he is, it takes most time to kill him than another gens. In fact if you have enough gens with rumor, any enemy gen is not a problem, just takes more or less time to kill, and Coulson is the one which takes most time to kill. Don't know about conquests, I played only once without gens and enemy gens I met just killed with missiles on the way.
|
|
|
Post by best75 on Feb 7, 2018 23:44:38 GMT
For the terrorist campaign there is Osborn who always has a ton of HP and takes a few turns to kill. Mortita is also there, he's the only infantry general the terrorist have in the campaign but I seen his lvl 5 cover skill activate far too often. Want me to include Osborn in the polls? Sure go ahead, he's a general I think many would hate facing
|
|
|
Post by leetowvorbeck on Feb 8, 2018 8:47:46 GMT
Want me to include Osborn in the polls? Sure go ahead, he's a general I think many would hate facing Sorry doesn't seem like can edit the poll now. I checked the options in both mobile and PC versions if this site but no go
|
|
|
Post by Thomas Blamey on Feb 10, 2018 5:40:27 GMT
zhurov is really annoying (currently trying to beat the record for 1939 no tech and no generals) and Soviet steamroller led by him is very painfully hard to destroy.
|
|
|
Post by War Master on Feb 10, 2018 6:17:31 GMT
I hate the most are Montgomery and Patton. Easytech gave them such normal skills but mixed up together especially when it comes to Domination Mode -_-
|
|
|
Post by Tito on Feb 10, 2018 8:19:15 GMT
These ones might not be popular and both are on Japanese Conquest an issue. Midway is easy to take, right? And then Hawaii easier as there are less Ships? Wrong. Arnold is a high air general, on a Field Arty and with Rumor. He can deal a lot of dammage to your 2nd Assault Navy (assuming you will split the navy after Midway is yours. Onr going to the west coast while the other goes for Hawaii and then Australia) and hr can dammage your Ground Units while in Carriers before landing. Other is the Commander on Shanghai. It is difficult to conquer the city there because of him. Not many of your starting units work on him. Iirc I lost Kuribyashi and Umezu to him and the Naval General on the small ship took a beating. I occupied Nanking before Shanghai.
|
|
|
Post by leetowvorbeck on Feb 10, 2018 10:19:23 GMT
I hate the most are Montgomery and Patton. Easytech gave them such normal skills but mixed up together especially when it comes to Domination Mode -_- Omg I can't believe you're here in my post XD. I watch your videos btw.
|
|