|
|
Post by NetherFreek on May 25, 2018 9:08:33 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by stijnistana on Jul 28, 2018 18:38:55 GMT
Is Scott worth buying or should i farm more medals and buy Kutuzov or moltke?
|
|
|
|
Post by andrei on Jul 28, 2018 18:52:27 GMT
Is Scott worth buying or should i farm more medals and buy Kutuzov or moltke? Don't take Moltke. Kutuzov and Scott are more or less same powerful. If You are choosing between them than Kutuzov will be slightly better in the field when placed on plain. But if it is the first artillery look at Alexander I and/or John with discount. |
|
|
|
Post by Kutuzov on Jul 28, 2018 22:13:05 GMT
I use Scharnhorst, but if you get Mahmud II, he is pretty much like Napoleon, who is an Iap. Moltke is really bad, no redeemable qualities. Scott is ok, but there are really better options. Like Alexander I who is much cheaper but has significantly better skills.
I would get Mahmud before getting someone as strong as Kutuzov.
|
|
|
|
Post by Iosef Stalin on Jul 31, 2018 13:17:42 GMT
Is Scott worth buying or should i farm more medals and buy Kutuzov or moltke? just get more to get Moltke or kutuzov |
|
|
|
Post by Iosef Stalin on Jul 31, 2018 13:18:52 GMT
Is Scott worth buying or should i farm more medals and buy Kutuzov or moltke? Don't take Moltke. Kutuzov and Scott are more or less same powerful. If You are choosing between them than Kutuzov will be slightly better in the field when placed on plain. But if it is the first artillery look at Alexander I and/or John with discount. I know Moltke is good. |
|
|
|
Post by andrei on Jul 31, 2018 13:41:37 GMT
Don't take Moltke. Kutuzov and Scott are more or less same powerful. If You are choosing between them than Kutuzov will be slightly better in the field when placed on plain. But if it is the first artillery look at Alexander I and/or John with discount. I know Moltke is good. What exactly You mean by saying "good"? Skills, stats, anything else? |
|
|
|
Post by Iosef Stalin on Jul 31, 2018 13:43:32 GMT
What exactly You mean by saying "good"? Skills, stats, anything else? By personal preference I think Moltke's skills are good. |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Jul 31, 2018 13:43:44 GMT
No Moltke isn’t. He is just jourdan except with jungle fighting instead of mountain fighting.
|
|
|
|
Post by andrei on Jul 31, 2018 13:46:20 GMT
What exactly You mean by saying "good"? Skills, stats, anything else? By personal preference I think Moltke's skills are good. Again "good"  To say that skills are good means better than other purple and gold tier gens possess. But it is not true. Therefore Moltke is awful & expensive medal waste |
|
|
|
Post by Kutuzov on Jul 31, 2018 21:27:08 GMT
Again "good" To say that skills are good means better than other purple and gold tier gens possess. But it is not true. Therefore Moltke is awful & expensive medal waste Agreed, I mean he is a gold tier general but doesn’t have salvo. How is he any better than John? |
|
|
|
Post by Kutuzov on Jul 31, 2018 21:28:29 GMT
John who has salvo, in addition to jungle and storm fortifications, get him instead. Or if you need a strong enough to carry you through till John’s 50% discount, why not get Mahmud II.
|
|
|
|
Post by mrniceman on Aug 1, 2018 1:47:41 GMT
I use Scharnhorst, but if you get Mahmud II, he is pretty much like Napoleon, who is an Iap. Moltke is really bad, no redeemable qualities. Scott is ok, but there are really better options. Like Alexander I who is much cheaper but has significantly better skills. I would get Mahmud before getting someone as strong as Kutuzov. You always say that Mahmud is as gd as Napoleon. I get he have 3 good skills but I just don’t see why bro, he is far from Napoleon as I can tell. |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Aug 1, 2018 3:05:37 GMT
I use Scharnhorst, but if you get Mahmud II, he is pretty much like Napoleon, who is an Iap. Moltke is really bad, no redeemable qualities. Scott is ok, but there are really better options. Like Alexander I who is much cheaper but has significantly better skills. I would get Mahmud before getting someone as strong as Kutuzov. You always say that Mahmud is as gd as Napoleon. I get he have 3 good skills but I just don’t see why bro, he is far from Napoleon as I can tell. 3 very good skills, the sames ones napoleon shares. Counterrattack is meh, so the only thing he really has on mahmud ii is storm fortifications. They are really similar even if they don’t look like it. Artillery expert buffs them and other units around them, and salvo + artillery master is responsible for their main punching power. The only differences come in rank and health level, which can be fixed. Really the main reason people buy Mahmud and Alexander is for their artillery expert skill, which is also the most useful asset of Napoleon. |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Aug 1, 2018 3:07:14 GMT
|
|
