|
|
Post by NetherFreek on May 25, 2018 9:09:28 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Aug 5, 2018 0:51:46 GMT
A good and very cheap general, but not one for the final lineup. Nevertheless, if you want a strong defense general, I would go for either him or Napoleon III
|
|
Danbomo
Captain
This is my status
Posts: 85
|
Post by Danbomo on Aug 8, 2018 7:30:41 GMT
My second general I purchased; as much as he is dear to my heart in a history sense, his attack and his damage to buildings seems glaringly weak.
Some love, more hate
|
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Aug 8, 2018 12:04:19 GMT
My second general I purchased; as much as he is dear to my heart in a history sense, his attack and his damage to buildings seems glaringly weak. Some love, more hate Lol. His output is around Jourdan’s, but he can crit a lot more often. I would consider grinding medals from 1798 netherlands, and trading him for Scharnhorst. |
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Aug 8, 2018 13:10:55 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Aug 8, 2018 13:13:19 GMT
I honestly think that the best general Artillery general outside Artillery Experts is John. 1. He has two excellent artillery skills. 2. He has two terrain bonuses which stack together. 3. It is possible to hire him for less than 1000 medals. 4. He is a king. I like him a lot too, but he lacks artillery master sadly. But I have mahmud ii and napoleon rn, and the only other general I will consider adding to my roster is alexander. |
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Aug 8, 2018 13:16:11 GMT
I honestly think that the best general Artillery general outside Artillery Experts is John. 1. He has two excellent artillery skills. 2. He has two terrain bonuses which stack together. 3. It is possible to hire him for less than 1000 medals. 4. He is a king. I like him a lot too, but he lacks artillery master sadly. But I have mahmud ii and napoleon rn, and the only other general I will consider adding to my roster is alexander. I think it is a wise choice  As I said elsewhere 3 generals with aura are the best possible combination in the game. |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Aug 8, 2018 13:22:45 GMT
I like him a lot too, but he lacks artillery master sadly. But I have mahmud ii and napoleon rn, and the only other general I will consider adding to my roster is alexander. I think it is a wise choice As I said elsewhere 3 generals with aura are the best possible combination in the game. I think Scharnhorst and John are both severly underrated. From using Scharnhorst and the 20% crit medal, his output was just unbearably higher, even to the point where he one hit killed enemies on rocket artillery. |
|
|
|
Post by coronel on Aug 8, 2018 15:52:37 GMT
Martin is good. but there are better
|
|
|
|
Post by Admiral Aleksandr Kolchak on Aug 9, 2018 4:03:57 GMT
I have Napoleon, Alexander, and Mahmud. Lemme day they are a great team XD
|
|
nelson98
Captain
World Slowest Conqueror
Posts: 93
|
Post by nelson98 on Aug 25, 2018 13:40:26 GMT
If john was not cheap it would be better than john
|
|
|
|
Post by Robert Walpole on Aug 25, 2018 13:43:50 GMT
If john was not cheap it would be better than john wait what |
|
nelson98
Captain
World Slowest Conqueror
Posts: 93
|
Post by nelson98 on Aug 25, 2018 13:48:12 GMT
john would not be a good general if it was not cheap  |
|
|
|
Post by Iosef Stalin on Aug 25, 2018 13:52:32 GMT
A good and very cheap general, but not one for the final lineup. Nevertheless, if you want a strong defense general, I would go for either him or Napoleon III He is okay if you cannot save up for Mahmud II. |
|
|
|
Post by Robert Walpole on Aug 25, 2018 13:55:55 GMT
A good and very cheap general, but not one for the final lineup. Nevertheless, if you want a strong defense general, I would go for either him or Napoleon III He is okay if you cannot save up for Mahmud II. Sounds like laziness over quality for me |
|
