|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Oct 8, 2019 22:52:15 GMT
Maxed Blucher: ibb.co/T0YrrSKI decided to give him the Flintlock Pistol instead. Noice. How’d you find the time to get him maxed out so quick? And the golden badges? The only time i really get to farm is when doing assignments for another class. |
|
|
|
Post by Gone on Oct 8, 2019 22:55:10 GMT
Maxed Blucher: ibb.co/T0YrrSKI decided to give him the Flintlock Pistol instead. Noice. How’d you find the time to get him maxed out so quick? And the golden badges? The only time i really get to farm is when doing assignments for another class. Vacation week after school trip. Classes only start on Monday. |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Oct 8, 2019 22:56:41 GMT
Noice. How’d you find the time to get him maxed out so quick? And the golden badges? The only time i really get to farm is when doing assignments for another class. Vacation week after school trip. Classes only start on Monday. Nice. |
|
|
|
Post by Gone on Oct 8, 2019 23:01:25 GMT
Though I always love coming back home early on Wednesdays and relaxing after a long day on Fridays.
Anyway, back to the topic, Edge seems to be really good. Using Blücher, I attacked Karl with the Netherlands Heavy Cavalry on 1798 and he took like half of his HP away.
|
|
|
|
Post by Charlemagne on Nov 24, 2019 7:01:30 GMT
Murat is the second best after blucher.
|
|
|
|
Post by SolidLight on Nov 24, 2019 8:11:25 GMT
Murat is the second best after blucher. I personally find Murat to be the best. Surprise attack is a pretty strong skill that Blucher lacks. But really there’s very little difference between the two. They’re both gods of war. |
|
|
|
Post by Gone on Jan 22, 2020 6:26:25 GMT
It seems that it's always the "cavalry" IAP that is the best one. Manstein, Blucher, Hannibal. The only exception seems to be Washington in EW5. And now we have Ludendorff! Even with the skill books around, the guy is still the best general of the sequel! 😁 |
|
|
|
Post by Antonina of Philippopolis on Jan 22, 2020 16:13:23 GMT
Murat is the second best after blucher. I personally find Murat to be the best. Surprise attack is a pretty strong skill that Blucher lacks. But really there’s very little difference between the two. They’re both gods of war. Very true. Besides Blutcher on victory rush lags. It doesn't often trigger like Murat or Lan does on Light cavalry. |
|
|
|
Post by SolidLight on Jan 22, 2020 16:14:28 GMT
I personally find Murat to be the best. Surprise attack is a pretty strong skill that Blucher lacks. But really there’s very little difference between the two. They’re both gods of war. Very true. Besides Blutcher on victory rush lags. It doesn't often trigger like Murat or Lan does on Light cavalry. Victory rush has a 75% chance to trigger, no matter what general is on it. |
|
|
|
Post by Antonina of Philippopolis on Jan 22, 2020 16:38:49 GMT
Victory rush has a 75% chance to trigger, no matter what general is on it. now I did noticed my Murat , Lan and Ney utilize victory rush more often then Blutcher . Using their same tactics for nearby enemies he might trigger victory only once then later on the usual 3 moves. But don't hardly see it triggering when he's finishing off a unit . Still he'sa good investment later on. |
|
|
|
Post by mikhailfrunze on Jul 11, 2020 0:06:21 GMT
Hey forum! I am trying to decide on my game investments:) I played a lot of "Great Conqueror Rome" and i had all three IAPs from that game. Among them only Hannibal was a unique beast, much stronger than any other gen in his tier, while Caesar and Spartacus did not show much difference from their free alternatives, if showed any. Reading this thread I had a feeling like it's the same situation in EW6 with Blucher. How accurate is this? If Blucher is the only IAP who is significantly better than free cavalry gens, i would consider getting just him. Otherwise, I am free to play this time. There must be people who tried them all out  Thank you! |
|
|
|
Post by SolidLight on Jul 11, 2020 10:07:07 GMT
Hey forum! I am trying to decide on my game investments:) I played a lot of "Great Conqueror Rome" and i had all three IAPs from that game. Among them only Hannibal was a unique beast, much stronger than any other gen in his tier, while Caesar and Spartacus did not show much difference from their free alternatives, if showed any. Reading this thread I had a feeling like it's the same situation in EW6 with Blucher. How accurate is this? If Blucher is the only IAP who is significantly better than free cavalry gens, i would consider getting just him. Otherwise, I am free to play this time. There must be people who tried them all out Thank you! Blucher is one of the only two worthwhile IAPs in EW6:1804. The other one being Desaix. He's actually not significantly better than a free cavalry general you can get (Murat), but it's like getting a 2nd version of the best general in the game, which is game-changing. Another thing that's nice about IAPs is that they don't take up general slots, which are a very scarce resource in EW6:1804. Desaix is only worthwhile because of his daily 100 medals bonus, otherwise he's pretty mediocre. Napoleon is actually a very good artillery general, but the problem is that he's not really necessary since artillery isn't good for much other than sieging. There's tons of people that can fill in his role. And he's pretty expensive to boot. I guess it's nice that he doesn't take up a general slot, but he's not worth it. And Wellesley just sucks. The only thing he's good for is for being an admiral without having to use a general slot on one. Typically it's just the cavalry/tank IAPs that are worth it in ET games. The only exception to this rule is EW5. |
|
|
|
Post by mikhailfrunze on Jul 11, 2020 15:24:11 GMT
SolidLight, Thanks for this reply, it was helpful! Ill go for Desaix to help myself save faster while i dont have much time to farm. And I"ll save my buck on Blucher for now
|
|
|
|
Post by mikhailfrunze on Jul 11, 2020 15:27:10 GMT
Hey forum! I am trying to decide on my game investments:) I played a lot of "Great Conqueror Rome" and i had all three IAPs from that game. Among them only Hannibal was a unique beast, much stronger than any other gen in his tier, while Caesar and Spartacus did not show much difference from their free alternatives, if showed any. Reading this thread I had a feeling like it's the same situation in EW6 with Blucher. How accurate is this? If Blucher is the only IAP who is significantly better than free cavalry gens, i would consider getting just him. Otherwise, I am free to play this time. There must be people who tried them all out Thank you! Blucher is one of the only two worthwhile IAPs in EW6:1804. The other one being Desaix. He's actually not significantly better than a free cavalry general you can get (Murat), but it's like getting a 2nd version of the best general in the game, which is game-changing. Another thing that's nice about IAPs is that they don't take up general slots, which are a very scarce resource in EW6:1804. Desaix is only worthwhile because of his daily 100 medals bonus, otherwise he's pretty mediocre. Napoleon is actually a very good artillery general, but the problem is that he's not really necessary since artillery isn't good for much other than sieging. There's tons of people that can fill in his role. And he's pretty expensive to boot. I guess it's nice that he doesn't take up a general slot, but he's not worth it. And Wellesley just sucks. The only thing he's good for is for being an admiral without having to use a general slot on one. Typically it's just the cavalry/tank IAPs that are worth it in ET games. The only exception to this rule is EW5. And right now I am trying to understand how to do quotation here  |
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Feb 18, 2021 14:46:12 GMT
The best gen in the game, if only he was infantry...
|
|
Thank you! 
