|
|
Post by Gone on Aug 24, 2019 21:37:16 GMT
“No good skills”? Are you trolling? I don’t advise buying him though. He is hard to use. If you wouldn’t buy bagration, you don’t want davout. Yeah. He is great but I would get Lan or Ney instead. |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Aug 24, 2019 22:16:54 GMT
I don’t advise buying him though. He is hard to use. If you wouldn’t buy bagration, you don’t want davout. Yeah. He is great but I would get Lan or Ney instead. Plus in ew6, leaving your generals in the city is suicide, militia or in the worst scenarios, line infantry will do |
|
|
|
Post by silvercreek on Aug 27, 2019 4:13:27 GMT
Yeah. He is great but I would get Lan or Ney instead. Plus in ew6, leaving your generals in the city is suicide, militia or in the worst scenarios, line infantry will do Upgrade militia to defend cities I prefer riflemen,since they move faster and have higher attack😁 |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Aug 27, 2019 11:06:24 GMT
Plus in ew6, leaving your generals in the city is suicide, militia or in the worst scenarios, line infantry will do Upgrade militia to defend cities I prefer riflemen,since they move faster and have higher attack😁 Line infantry have the best defense though. For 25 gold, huge improvement on militia. |
|
|
|
Post by silvercreek on Aug 27, 2019 14:39:47 GMT
Upgrade militia to defend cities I prefer riflemen,since they move faster and have higher attack😁 Line infantry have the best defense though. For 25 for medals, huge improvement on militia. Riflemen have better attack and Hp line can build,now we are splitting hairs here. Either one would be better than militia. |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Aug 27, 2019 16:06:21 GMT
Line infantry have the best defense though. For 25 for medals, huge improvement on militia. Riflemen have better attack and Hp line can build,now we are splitting hairs here. Either one would be better than militia. Agreed. Militia are good for holding cities against mild waves. Although I can understand spamming rifleman and grenadiers to defend as they are good on the offensive as well. |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Aug 27, 2019 22:43:42 GMT
It’s scipio from ew6 In all fairness though. He isn’t bad at all. That was a bit of an overreaction on my part when I found out murat was better. Park him in a stable or use him to capture cities. Comparable to Lan and Ney. Should you buy him? With murat and dabrowski to back him up, sure. But give him an ambulance as he will take a lot of damage. At least a 4/5 |
|
|
|
Post by Gone on Oct 21, 2019 21:50:26 GMT
Him, Massena and Lannes are considered as Napoleon’s finest generals. Glad to see that all of them are ranked among the top generals in their respective roles.
|
|
|
|
Post by SolidLight on Oct 21, 2019 22:48:00 GMT
I don’t like him that much because he’s really RNG. He relies on crit damage and tactic master. His terrain is decent in the early game but is way too dangerous to try to use in later campaigns and conquests. So the only consistent damage skills he has are strike, which everyone should have, and edge, which is good.
He’s honestly not that bad. He’s basically a tougher Paget with a ton of damage variation.
|
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Oct 22, 2019 10:40:48 GMT
I don’t like him that much because he’s really RNG. He relies on crit damage and tactic master. His terrain is decent in the early game but is way too dangerous to try to use in later campaigns and conquests. So the only consistent damage skills he has are strike, which everyone should have, and edge, which is good. He’s honestly not that bad. He’s basically a tougher Paget with a ton of damage variation. If his terrain bonus was plain fighting or jungles, he would be better than lan. His terrain bonus is just bad. He is very close to being a great general. |
|
|
|
Post by SolidLight on Oct 22, 2019 11:36:47 GMT
I don’t like him that much because he’s really RNG. He relies on crit damage and tactic master. His terrain is decent in the early game but is way too dangerous to try to use in later campaigns and conquests. So the only consistent damage skills he has are strike, which everyone should have, and edge, which is good. He’s honestly not that bad. He’s basically a tougher Paget with a ton of damage variation. If his terrain bonus was plain fighting or jungles, he would be better than lan. His terrain bonus is just bad. He is very close to being a great general. It's ok, it activates when you capture stables and factories and that's great as that means that the AI has to spawn infantry which are lol. That's only in the early game tho, use station in 1815 and crimean war and watch as 60% of Davouts HP disappears in one round. |
|
|
|
Post by Gone on Oct 26, 2019 22:05:13 GMT
I don’t like him that much because he’s really RNG. He relies on crit damage and tactic master. His terrain is decent in the early game but is way too dangerous to try to use in later campaigns and conquests. So the only consistent damage skills he has are strike, which everyone should have, and edge, which is good. He’s honestly not that bad. He’s basically a tougher Paget with a ton of damage variation. If his terrain bonus was plain fighting or jungles, he would be better than lan. His terrain bonus is just bad. He is very close to being a great general. He is great. But after watching juljas using him and Lan, non-aura cavalry generals deal much less damage than aura cavalry generals. |
|
|
|
Post by SolidLight on Oct 26, 2019 23:15:23 GMT
If his terrain bonus was plain fighting or jungles, he would be better than lan. His terrain bonus is just bad. He is very close to being a great general. He is great. But after watching juljas using him and Lan, non-aura cavalry generals deal much less damage than aura cavalry generals. That’s because the aura adds attack straight to the base unit. Blucher, Murat, and Dabrowski are commanding 90 atk lancers instead of 70 atk lancers. That means that the +20 atk is affected by absolutely every damage multiplier. Which is why they’re so much better than the non-aura gens. I personally think Paget’s slightly better due to having slightly better attack, since his -4% defense doesn’t really matter when cavalry has such crazy high defense stats. |
|
|
|
Post by Gone on Oct 26, 2019 23:19:36 GMT
He is great. But after watching juljas using him and Lan, non-aura cavalry generals deal much less damage than aura cavalry generals. That’s because the aura adds attack straight to the base unit. Blucher, Murat, and Dabrowski are commanding 90 atk lancers instead of 70 atk lancers. That means that the +20 atk is affected by absolutely every damage multiplier. Which is why they’re so much better than the non-aura gens. I personally think Paget’s slightly better due to having slightly better attack, since his -4% defense doesn’t really matter when cavalry has such crazy high defense stats. True. Even Anna is painful to kill when you play as USA. |
|
|
|
Post by Charlemagne on Nov 24, 2019 6:15:46 GMT
Davout is good but murat is better cuz of plain fighting and cavalry commander. Also davout has station which is bad, especially for cavalry.
|
|
