|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Apr 1, 2016 23:40:05 GMT
But which mod are you? (Reference to the fact that the mods switched names) You will know at the end of the day. I already know. I can see usernames |
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Apr 2, 2016 0:58:41 GMT
Guys let's stop the Lannes and Suvorov thing! They are even not the same kind of infantry general! |
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Apr 2, 2016 5:11:26 GMT
Comparing Lannes to Suvorov is like comparing an M16 to an AK.
One will always hold and never break (Leadership) and pretty effective. The other is extremely good but can break (circle)
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Apr 2, 2016 5:58:17 GMT
Comparing Lannes to Suvorov is like comparing an M16 to an AK. One will always hold and never break (Leadership) and pretty effective. The other is extremely good but can break (circle) Suvorov has higher raw damage, but he can never succeed with Cavalry. |
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Apr 2, 2016 6:29:29 GMT
Comparing Lannes to Suvorov is like comparing an M16 to an AK. One will always hold and never break (Leadership) and pretty effective. The other is extremely good but can break (circle) Suvorov has higher raw damage, but he can never succeed with Cavalry. enough of this people! |
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Apr 2, 2016 6:33:56 GMT
Suvorov has higher raw damage, but he can never succeed with Cavalry. enough of this people! What I'm trying to say is, each has his advantages and disadvantages They're different. Apples to Oranges |
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Apr 2, 2016 6:38:47 GMT
What I'm trying to say is, each has his advantages and disadvantages They're different. Apples to Oranges y'know, we've discussed this stupidity for the past one whole year, and now, I'm bored with it (at least I am, if no one else is -_____- ) |
|
|
|
Post by Desophaeus on Apr 2, 2016 6:49:17 GMT
What I'm trying to say is, each has his advantages and disadvantages They're different. Apples to Oranges y'know, we've discussed this stupidity for the past one whole year, and now, I'm bored with it (at least I am, if no one else is -_____- ) Picard was only pointing out the reasoning behind why the debate is useless. The real Lannes was also being fairly reasonable about his explanation few posts up aa well. THIS time, at least. I'm grateful.  |
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Apr 2, 2016 6:51:33 GMT
y'know, we've discussed this stupidity for the past one whole year, and now, I'm bored with it (at least I am, if no one else is -_____- ) Picard was only pointing out the reasoning behind why the debate is useless. I'm talking about every single guy who has done this in the past whole year, including me (though I haven't done it for like 5 months) Let's end this war... |
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Apr 2, 2016 13:34:39 GMT
Comparing Lannes to Suvorov is like comparing an M16 to an AK. One will always hold and never break (Leadership) and pretty effective. The other is extremely good but can break (circle) Suvorov has higher raw damage, but he can never succeed with Cavalry. Exactly. Suvorov can't be used as hybrid but he can be very good on infsntry |
|
|
|
Post by Bismarck on Apr 3, 2016 12:11:40 GMT
Bismarck is totally a better General than all of those poop flingers.
|
|
|
|
Post by General Macarthur on Apr 3, 2016 13:46:17 GMT
I'm a decent general...
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Apr 3, 2016 13:51:26 GMT
Picard was only pointing out the reasoning behind why the debate is useless. I'm talking about every single guy who has done this in the past whole year, including me (though I haven't done it for like 5 months) Let's end this war... The problem is this time there was no war. We just explained how stupid the war was |
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Apr 3, 2016 13:52:14 GMT
If you discount the fact that MacArthur extended the war by 6 months, yes |
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Apr 4, 2016 14:37:21 GMT
I'm talking about every single guy who has done this in the past whole year, including me (though I haven't done it for like 5 months) Let's end this war... The problem is this time there was no war. We just explained how stupid the war was It's best to drop the subject entirely. |
|
