|
|
Post by juljas on Jul 25, 2018 12:08:04 GMT
this whole list is basically andrei, and a little bit of stoic, (little bit of monica in my life a little bit of stoic by my side and little bit of andrei is what i need) XD maybe one day i'll try to break one of your records! btw guys what was your 1943 record in wc4? i did the soviets in 25 turns once and would like to know how close i am to your records |
|
|
|
Post by andrei on Jul 25, 2018 12:23:00 GMT
this whole list is basically andrei , and a little bit of stoic , (little bit of monica in my life a little bit of stoic by my side and little bit of andrei is what i need) XD maybe one day i'll try to break one of your records! btw guys what was your 1943 record in wc4? i did the soviets in 25 turns once and would like to know how close i am to your records Mine was 16 turns for Soviets 1943 european-war-4.boards.net/post/168427 |
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Jul 25, 2018 12:58:36 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by andrei on Jul 25, 2018 19:41:46 GMT
By far fastest 2* 1798 conquest Denmark 37 turns  |
|
|
|
Post by Robert Walpole on Jul 25, 2018 22:21:42 GMT
Campaign record was 4 turns in the first mission of Declaration of Independence
Can someone beat it in less than 4 turns?
|
|
|
|
Post by andrei on Jul 26, 2018 6:30:38 GMT
Beated previous 2* 1798 conquest (4 turns faster) Denmark 33 turns  |
|
|
|
Post by andrei on Jul 26, 2018 12:28:20 GMT
Fastest for 1806 conquest and 2* country Denmark - 34 turns  |
|
|
|
Post by juljas on Jul 26, 2018 13:03:03 GMT
Fastest for 1806 conquest and 2* country Denmark - 34 turns dang i feel like a 12 prepubescent girl trying to compete with body builders in a muscle contest! how do you guys do these kind of things xDDD |
|
|
|
Post by andrei on Jul 26, 2018 13:10:04 GMT
juljas, it is important to make a good start. For almost every country there are several tricky moments in the very beginning - like You need to take a particular city by turn 3 or 4, for example. Otherwise You want have enough money to buy a unit and assign a general which consequently result in not being in time at a particular place. And it is also very important to allocate generals properly - some must attack one way, some - another. Than You will be more or less same time both sides 
|
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Jul 26, 2018 13:18:38 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Jul 27, 2018 9:42:44 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by andrei on Jul 27, 2018 11:17:35 GMT
1806, Britain, 33 turns  Britain is fun. I liked it in 1812. To kill US very fast, to support Spain and Portugal with Wellington and arty and to attack Rome. And all at te same time. Really fun |
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Jul 27, 2018 13:35:01 GMT
1806, Britain, 33 turns Britain is fun. I liked it in 1812. To kill US very fast, to support Spain and Portugal with Wellington and arty and to attack Rome. And all at te same time. Really fun Yeah, but there is one thing that for certain is no fun at all Turkish cities in Mesopotamia. However in 1806 the situation is quite different. You have two units of Highlanders in Mediterranean and 3 ships - a fortune for starting a small war  |
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Jul 28, 2018 9:24:32 GMT
I completed 1789 conquest in 33 turns as Naples as well... So there are at least several 2* countries with more or less equal chances  |
|
|
|
Post by andrei on Jul 28, 2018 9:51:49 GMT
Denmark 32 turns 1806 
|
|
