|
|
Post by Seger on Jun 26, 2019 8:16:03 GMT
Probably, he does use blast,since it is easily available on 1 turn and any turn thereafter as long as you have tatic cards,also,let's not forget, an Cavalry strike or two, will weaken city defense,thus allowing infrantry to easily walk in. Well, yeah, so riflemen only occupying cities. I hope You don't think it is an innovative move  The most interesting is what are those innovative moves cojoncio is using to beat records. By now it is not very clear and we spent 20 pages to recieve couple of answers  He is not very interested in revealing it, well it's his right. However it is interesting to share imo. That's just imo. I don't think it is a big innovation but used it in a comparison to explain that 3 cav + 3 inf gens is better than 6 cav gens and I understand that you are curious about his method but it seems almost like you think it is suspicious , while so far everything was right that he told us |
|
|
|
Post by andrei on Jun 26, 2019 8:23:55 GMT
Well, yeah, so riflemen only occupying cities. I hope You don't think it is an innovative move The most interesting is what are those innovative moves cojoncio is using to beat records. By now it is not very clear and we spent 20 pages to recieve couple of answers He is not very interested in revealing it, well it's his right. However it is interesting to share imo. That's just imo. I don't think it is a big innovation but used it in a comparison to explain that 3 cav + 3 inf gens is better than 6 cav gens and I understand that you are curious about his method but it seems almost like you think it is suspicious , while so far everything was right that he told us I don't want to renew the discussion about suspiciosness. As I actually initiated the vote and voted for him. Just expressed my opinion that still there are interesting moves he is using which we have no idea are. As earlier noone beated a country with just one not very strong cav gen or something like that. Definetely such an explanation doesn't explain his strategy. That's what I meant. |
|
|
|
Post by silvercreek on Jun 26, 2019 9:17:09 GMT
Beating France in 15 turns is mind boggling to me,however I accept it,as that's what you guys do perhaps hacking IDK
|
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Jun 26, 2019 10:57:05 GMT
Being a representative of the "old school" (I remember the times when buying aura generals was OK ), I nevertheless repeated another one of cojoncio's records. best751815 Russia 32 turns. Grant spoiled a clear victory... again... holding the last remaining city for 3 turns. Yet, I know someday he will do me a favor and will be killed in less than 32 turns  |
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Jun 26, 2019 11:15:58 GMT
Actually best75 wrote it even before I completed the conquest. He knew that I will do it |
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Jun 26, 2019 12:17:22 GMT
It really depends on how good GCR is  The question is still an open one But cojoncio doesn't know it. It is only between us Then,you should both should just shake hands,an go on,no hard feelings. Btw,GCR will be very good😁 I was joking . In fact, I am very happy that this old thread has a new life thanks to our new champions including cojoncio. It was more exciting than I thought to participate again in our competition with a completely new team of generals. |
|
|
|
Post by Harry Lillis "Bing" Crosby Jr on Jun 26, 2019 12:28:13 GMT
old thread? This thread has multiple times the wc4 records thread!  |
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Jun 26, 2019 12:35:20 GMT
old thread? This thread has multiple times the wc4 records thread! Almost a year this thread is active So, yes, it is quite old. Who knows, maybe one day somebody will challenge your records as well |
|
|
|
Post by Harry Lillis "Bing" Crosby Jr on Jun 26, 2019 12:39:57 GMT
stoic , there was this member Yo Nguyen Giap who was keen on challenging my 1950 usa record, but like Max he has been offline for very long now, and I cant get anyone interested in joining in the fun 
|
|
|
|
Post by Harry Lillis "Bing" Crosby Jr on Jun 26, 2019 12:41:23 GMT
and I am bent on getting that fastest 1943 ussr record from max, but my max (no pun intended) is 14 turns whilst the current record is 12. This 14 turn limit has been repeated 4 times, making me even more frustrated to get that last record in order to "dominate" 1943  |
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Jun 26, 2019 13:45:01 GMT
and I am bent on getting that fastest 1943 ussr record from max, but my max (no pun intended) is 14 turns whilst the current record is 12. This 14 turn limit has been repeated 4 times, making me even more frustrated to get that last record in order to "dominate" 1943 There are also 1980 conquests, so the fun is yours |
|
|
|
Post by silvercreek on Jun 26, 2019 17:22:43 GMT
Then,you should both should just shake hands,an go on,no hard feelings. Btw,GCR will be very good😁 I was joking . In fact, I am very happy that this old thread has a new life thanks to our new champions including cojoncio. It was more exciting than I thought to participate again in our competition with a completely new team of generals. Yes,it has been quite a ride indeed,and still going 🍿😁🍿 |
|
|
|
Post by cojoncio on Jun 27, 2019 1:38:18 GMT
Have You tried advance by conquer cities with riflemen? His results are achievable. But he still keeps his secrets. I have no idea how to conquer relatively high level cities with riflemen. hahahaha conquer cities with riflemen is easier than with militia hahahahaha
Tunnel!
|
|
|
|
Post by Harry Lillis "Bing" Crosby Jr on Jun 27, 2019 5:59:21 GMT
and I am bent on getting that fastest 1943 ussr record from max, but my max (no pun intended) is 14 turns whilst the current record is 12. This 14 turn limit has been repeated 4 times, making me even more frustrated to get that last record in order to "dominate" 1943 There are also 1980 conquests, so the fun is yours omg 16 turns with turkey, im at my 16th turn as egypt and I havent landed in america yet! |
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Jun 27, 2019 6:09:13 GMT
There are also 1980 conquests, so the fun is yours omg 16 turns with turkey, im at my 16th turn as egypt and I havent landed in america yet! So there is a room for improvement, isn't there ? |
|
