|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Aug 19, 2018 15:01:15 GMT
Jesus Christ! Again Morillo... Jones is not mentioned but Morillo is. What is wrong with naval gens evaluation?! I don’t think Jones is good. I feel as though Jervis is much better than him, hence why he isn’t recommended. And morillo is a risky buy. Half the people love him, the other half hate him. |
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Aug 19, 2018 17:20:16 GMT
Jesus Christ! Again Morillo... Jones is not mentioned but Morillo is. What is wrong with naval gens evaluation?! I don’t think Jones is good. I feel as though Jervis is much better than him, hence why he isn’t recommended. And morillo is a risky buy. Half the people love him, the other half hate him. But it is some kind of irrational love, I should say  |
|
|
|
Post by supersmashkoala on Aug 19, 2018 19:47:12 GMT
Anyway, this is why you want Masséna, Barclay, and Karl. The common units around them will do massive damage. Hmmm... what if I take Washington instead? How much would his raw damage be buffed? |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Aug 20, 2018 1:27:33 GMT
Anyway, this is why you want Masséna, Barclay, and Karl. The common units around them will do massive damage. Hmmm... what if I take Washington instead? How much would his raw damage be buffed? + 40 damage. The attack of common militia will be reduced to 90, so expect the surrounding milita to do damage of around 40-50, whereas militia eith barclay will do 60-70. |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Aug 20, 2018 1:28:19 GMT
Anyway, this is why you want Masséna, Barclay, and Karl. The common units around them will do massive damage. Hmmm... what if I take Washington instead? How much would his raw damage be buffed? Really neither is a bad choice honestly. |
|
|
|
Post by banjo on Aug 20, 2018 8:20:25 GMT
Anyway, this is why you want Masséna, Barclay, and Karl. The common units around them will do massive damage. Hmmm... what if I take Washington instead? How much would his raw damage be buffed? It’s all dependent on your play style, if you like to infantry spam and push an entire front then go with Barclay, if you like to play hero with your gens, go with Washington, you will gen better individual output from him. Personally I went went with Washington because he fits my style, but I can easily see Barclay being a stronger choice in some scenarios. |
|
|
|
Post by Robert Walpole on Aug 20, 2018 11:04:31 GMT
I desperately need a new infantry general (Clinton sucks.). I heard Karl and Barclay are good, but I'd like the top five. HoW DaRe YoU SaY CliNtOn sUcKs hE CaN oNe ShOt A taNk uSinG MiliTiA!1!1!1!1!1 |
|
|
|
Post by supersmashkoala on Aug 20, 2018 18:56:27 GMT
I desperately need a new infantry general (Clinton sucks.). I heard Karl and Barclay are good, but I'd like the top five. HoW DaRe YoU SaY CliNtOn sUcKs hE CaN oNe ShOt A taNk uSinG MiliTiA!1!1!1!1!1 He IsNt MaXeD oUt So He CaNnOt!1!1!1!1!1!1 |
|
|
|
Post by Iosef Stalin on Aug 26, 2018 20:52:57 GMT
Basically, get Massena.
|
|
|
|
Post by andrei on Aug 26, 2018 20:57:28 GMT
What is the point to spam every thread with this sentence? |
|
|
|
Post by Iosef Stalin on Aug 26, 2018 20:58:29 GMT
I don't know. I just really like Massena as a starting general.
|
|
|
|
Post by Robert Walpole on Aug 27, 2018 1:43:43 GMT
What is the point to spam every thread with this sentence? Finally someone who had noticed this lol |
|
