|
|
Post by supremo on Aug 21, 2018 23:55:11 GMT
Hi guys I don’t know if better but Mahmud or Kutuzov since Kutuzov is really expensive
|
|
|
|
Post by supersmashkoala on Aug 22, 2018 0:23:46 GMT
Mahmud is considered better than Kutuzov.
|
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Aug 22, 2018 2:09:58 GMT
Hi guys I don’t know if better but Mahmud or Kutuzov since Kutuzov is really expensive The price difference between Kutuzov and Mahmud isn’t really that big. 500 medals are nothing. Right now I just accidentally bought a legion medal for 300 medals, and I can recover from that mistake very quickly. Its not the price that makes Mahmud a better option than Kutuzov, its the abilites. Mahmud as a very nice combination of skills. Even desert fighting is quite useful in many occasions. On the other hand, Kutuzov, has plain fighting which is much easier to use. Also, Kutuzov has higher battle ability than Mahmud, but it won’t be too significant as Mahmud can reach emperor, whereas Kutuzov can’t. Saldy for Kutuzov, thats where his advantages end. Mahmud has artillery expert, one of the best skills in the game which not only adds 20 damage to his own output, but he does so to nearby artillery units as well. This makes him very useful. In addition, another significant advantage Mahmud has going for him is the fact that he has artillery master, whereas Kutuzov doesn’t, which is the sole reason I decided to replace Kutuzov with Scharnhorst. The only thing Kutuzov has going for him is salvo + plain fighting. As far as I know, plain fighting and city fighting don’t stack, and an experienced player will do anything possible to keep him from taking damage, so the 10% chance to reduce damage by 50% is useless. I am not entirely sure output wise, but it is safe to assume that Mahmud II does more damage than Kutuzov when in desert, while the latter is in plains. Even in plains, Mahmud’s output isn’t much less than Kutuzov’s. Just look at Napoleon. He doesn’t have a terrain bonus at all and is undoubtadly better than Kutuzov, whereas the difference between him and Mahmud is much less apparent. So in summary, for Kutuzov you are choosing: Salvo + plain fighting + higher battle ability For Mahmud you are choosing: Artillery master + artillery expert (very good skill) + higher output + emperor rank I personally got Mahmud and Alexander |
|
|
|
Post by supremo on Aug 22, 2018 10:45:23 GMT
Thanks for the suggestion then I will get Mahmud
|
|
|
|
Post by Robert Walpole on Aug 22, 2018 11:23:25 GMT
Quick question, can the medals you obtain from selling a fully upgraded kutuzov( at this point a couple 3700+ medals) compensate for a fully upgraded Mahmud?
|
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Aug 22, 2018 17:54:12 GMT
Hi guys I don’t know if better but Mahmud or Kutuzov since Kutuzov is really expensive The price difference between Kutuzov and Mahmud isn’t really that big. 500 medals are nothing. Right now I just accidentally bought a legion medal for 300 medals, and I can recover from that mistake very quickly. Its not the price that makes Mahmud a better option than Kutuzov, its the abilites. Mahmud as a very nice combination of skills. Even desert fighting is quite useful in many occasions. On the other hand, Kutuzov, has plain fighting which is much easier to use. Also, Kutuzov has higher battle ability than Mahmud, but it won’t be too significant as Mahmud can reach emperor, whereas Kutuzov can’t. Saldy for Kutuzov, thats where his advantages end. Mahmud has artillery expert, one of the best skills in the game which not only adds 20 damage to his own output, but he does so to nearby artillery units as well. This makes him very useful. In addition, another significant advantage Mahmud has going for him is the fact that he has artillery master, whereas Kutuzov doesn’t, which is the sole reason I decided to replace Kutuzov with Scharnhorst. The only thing Kutuzov has going for him is salvo + plain fighting. As far as I know, plain fighting and city fighting don’t stack, and an experienced player will do anything possible to keep him from taking damage, so the 10% chance to reduce damage by 50% is useless. I am not entirely sure output wise, but it is safe to assume that Mahmud II does more damage than Kutuzov when in desert, while the latter is in plains. Even in plains, Mahmud’s output isn’t much less than Kutuzov’s. Just look at Napoleon. He doesn’t have a terrain bonus at all and is undoubtadly better than Kutuzov, whereas the difference between him and Mahmud is much less apparent. So in summary, for Kutuzov you are choosing: Salvo + plain fighting + higher battle ability For Mahmud you are choosing: Artillery master + artillery expert (very good skill) + higher output + emperor rank I personally got Mahmud and Alexander Personally I prefer Scharnhorst more than Kutuzov. Exchanging 4% output with a couple hundred medals is not a bad deal. Still, John is the best non-commander artillery. |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Aug 22, 2018 21:39:28 GMT
The price difference between Kutuzov and Mahmud isn’t really that big. 500 medals are nothing. Right now I just accidentally bought a legion medal for 300 medals, and I can recover from that mistake very quickly. Its not the price that makes Mahmud a better option than Kutuzov, its the abilites. Mahmud as a very nice combination of skills. Even desert fighting is quite useful in many occasions. On the other hand, Kutuzov, has plain fighting which is much easier to use. Also, Kutuzov has higher battle ability than Mahmud, but it won’t be too significant as Mahmud can reach emperor, whereas Kutuzov can’t. Saldy for Kutuzov, thats where his advantages end. Mahmud has artillery expert, one of the best skills in the game which not only adds 20 damage to his own output, but he does so to nearby artillery units as well. This makes him very useful. In addition, another significant advantage Mahmud has going for him is the fact that he has artillery master, whereas Kutuzov doesn’t, which is the sole reason I decided to replace Kutuzov with Scharnhorst. The only thing Kutuzov has going for him is salvo + plain fighting. As far as I know, plain fighting and city fighting don’t stack, and an experienced player will do anything possible to keep him from taking damage, so the 10% chance to reduce damage by 50% is useless. I am not entirely sure output wise, but it is safe to assume that Mahmud II does more damage than Kutuzov when in desert, while the latter is in plains. Even in plains, Mahmud’s output isn’t much less than Kutuzov’s. Just look at Napoleon. He doesn’t have a terrain bonus at all and is undoubtadly better than Kutuzov, whereas the difference between him and Mahmud is much less apparent. So in summary, for Kutuzov you are choosing: Salvo + plain fighting + higher battle ability For Mahmud you are choosing: Artillery master + artillery expert (very good skill) + higher output + emperor rank I personally got Mahmud and Alexander Personally I prefer Scharnhorst more than Kutuzov. Exchanging 4% output with a couple hundred medals is not a bad deal. Still, John is the best non-commander artillery. Somebody else loves Scharnhorst!!! Yeah, he has the crit skill as well over Kutuzov |
|
|
|
Post by Iosef Stalin on Aug 24, 2018 22:40:53 GMT
Probably Kutuzov, because most people already have a general with an aura skill.
|
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Aug 24, 2018 23:34:18 GMT
Probably Kutuzov, because most people already have a general with an aura skill. Why not get another one then? |
|
|
|
Post by Iosef Stalin on Aug 24, 2018 23:35:28 GMT
Probably Kutuzov, because most people already have a general with an aura skill. Why not get another one then? At that point you already have one. Why another? |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Aug 24, 2018 23:38:50 GMT
Why not get another one then? At that point you already have one. Why another? An additional 20 damage. If you tag along another siege artillery, even without a general, with you, it will do + 40 damage from the buff. Thats why I swarm my massena karl and barclay with militia around them so they take less damage. Its really powerful actually |
|
|
|
Post by Iosef Stalin on Aug 25, 2018 0:07:56 GMT
An additional 20 damage. If you tag along another siege artillery, even without a general, with you, it will do + 40 damage from the buff. Thats why I swarm my massena karl and barclay with militia around them so they take less damage. Its really powerful actually I also do that. But you only need one. My Massena is enough. |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Aug 25, 2018 0:38:06 GMT
An additional 20 damage. If you tag along another siege artillery, even without a general, with you, it will do + 40 damage from the buff. Thats why I swarm my massena karl and barclay with militia around them so they take less damage. Its really powerful actually I also do that. But you only need one. My Massena is enough. You could always tag three along. The damage is huge |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Aug 25, 2018 0:38:57 GMT
You could always tag three along. The damage is huge But if you feel as though 1 is enough, all power to you, then I would get a strong output general, such as washington for inf, lan/davout for cav, and sophia/kutuzov to support you |
|
|
|
Post by Iosef Stalin on Aug 25, 2018 0:46:59 GMT
You could always tag three along. The damage is huge But if you feel as though 1 is enough, all power to you, then I would get a strong output general, such as washington for inf, lan/davout for cav, and sophia/kutuzov to support you I like high output generals. |
|
