|
|
Post by Robert Walpole on Aug 23, 2018 12:30:03 GMT
The thing is that with Denmark and Bavaria switching sides (surprisingly Italy didn’t change sides) the French Side is at its weakest. So 1815 is a Coalitionfest. But something tells me that France has a Trump Card.
(The trump card is having the ability to spawn troops at low tier cities like a Grenadier in a tier 2 city)
However, with Gran Colombia and Brazil joining in (it doesn’t even match that Gran Colombia is supposed to be at war with the Spanish’s Empire trying to gain its independence and that it would be logical that Gran Colombia is a French Ally) it seems that the coalition is at a massive advantage.
The front in North America is still the same with the difference that there are no British troops in Canada.
1 Star- Bavaria/Naples
Both are 1812 French Eagle hotspots and can work well depending on your strategy. With lend leasing and such, the American Front and the African Front can change.
2 stars- Denmark/Sweden/Brazil/Algeria
Only to face one front while lend leasing allies to take another, both can easily overcome the conquest. Brazil only needs to fight Gran Colombian troops with reinforcements from the Mexicans though. Algeria also has a massive advantage of holding one huge front and a minor front.
3 stars-USA/Prussia/Ottoman Empire
Prussia has evolved to 3 stars after Napoleon’s first exile which makes it an even major player than it once was before. USA’s tactics can be a scorched earth retreat and counterattack, by capturing and capitulating Canada then moving on lend leasing the allies in Europe, Africa and South America to at least handle a Front on their own while simultaneously invading South America and then Spain/ Britain. Ottoman also has a one front advantage due to Egypt joining at the later part of the fight.
This is seemingly the hardest conquest for the French Eagle faction so it’s reasonable for players to play the Coalition side.
However, I suggest to play at least with the French side due to the AI’s ability to spawn ELIs, Siege Artillery, Grenadiers and such at low tier cities.
|
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Aug 24, 2018 14:06:41 GMT
The thing is that with Denmark and Bavaria switching sides (surprisingly Italy didn’t change sides) the French Side is at its weakest. So 1815 is a Coalitionfest. But something tells me that France has a Trump Card. However, with Gran Colombia and Brazil joining in (it doesn’t even match that Gran Colombia is supposed to be at war with the Spanish’s Empire trying to gain its independence and that it would be logical that Gran Colombia is a French Ally) it seems that the coalition is at a massive advantage. The front in North America is still the same with the difference that there are no British troops in Canada. 1 Star- Bavaria/Naples Both are 1812 French Eagle hotspots and can work well depending on your strategy. With lend leasing and such, the American Front and the African Front can change. 2 stars- Denmark/Sweden/Brazil Only to face one front while lend leasing allies to take another, both can easily overcome the conquest. Brazil only needs to fight Gran Colombian troops with reinforcements from the Mexicans though. 3 stars-USA/Prussia Prussia has evolved to 3 stars after Napoleon’s first exile which makes it an even major player than it once was before. USA’s tactics can be a scorched earth retreat and counterattack, by capturing and capitulating Canada then moving on lend leasing the allies in Europe, Africa and South America to at least handle a Front on their own while simultaneously invading South America and then Spain/ Britain. This is currently the hardest conquest for the French Eagle faction so it’s reasonable for players to play the Coalition side. Bavaria looks a bit hard. How do you feel about morocco, as you can knock out algeria, then naples, then italy, then france, and you are very close to brazil |
|
|
|
Post by Storm on Aug 24, 2018 15:15:06 GMT
Actually the The ottomans are very good to play as because they can easily destroy russia and Austria within the first 20-30 turns. then they can finish Prussia before Sweden Denmark and Bavaria join. then the rest is an easy sweep as long as you find Brazil and USA and Algeria. Finished in 75 turns A rank
|
|
|
|
Post by Nobunaga Oda on Aug 25, 2018 6:05:11 GMT
Actually the The ottomans are very good to play as because they can easily destroy russia and Austria within the first 20-30 turns. then they can finish Prussia before Sweden Denmark and Bavaria join. then the rest is an easy sweep as long as you find Brazil and USA and Algeria. Finished in 75 turns A rank Someone else realises the strategic importance of the Ottomans in EW6! |
|
|
|
Post by Whoop on Aug 25, 2018 10:03:19 GMT
Algeria is also a good choice. Got in 108 turns an S rank with it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Aug 25, 2018 14:50:16 GMT
Actually the The ottomans are very good to play as because they can easily destroy russia and Austria within the first 20-30 turns. then they can finish Prussia before Sweden Denmark and Bavaria join. then the rest is an easy sweep as long as you find Brazil and USA and Algeria. Finished in 75 turns A rank Someone else realises the strategic importance of the Ottomans in EW6! Too bad you can’t play as the Netherlands in 1812 or 1815 |
|
|
|
Post by Robert Walpole on Aug 25, 2018 14:57:31 GMT
Someone else realises the strategic importance of the Ottomans in EW6! Too bad you can’t play as the Netherlands in 1812 or 1815 I wonder why the Dutch even conquered Bruxelles too... |
|
|
|
Post by Storm on Aug 25, 2018 15:08:26 GMT
The thing is that with Denmark and Bavaria switching sides (surprisingly Italy didn’t change sides) the French Side is at its weakest. So 1815 is a Coalitionfest. But something tells me that France has a Trump Card. However, with Gran Colombia and Brazil joining in (it doesn’t even match that Gran Colombia is supposed to be at war with the Spanish’s Empire trying to gain its independence and that it would be logical that Gran Colombia is a French Ally) it seems that the coalition is at a massive advantage. The front in North America is still the same with the difference that there are no British troops in Canada. 1 Star- Bavaria/Naples Both are 1812 French Eagle hotspots and can work well depending on your strategy. With lend leasing and such, the American Front and the African Front can change. 2 stars- Denmark/Sweden/Brazil Only to face one front while lend leasing allies to take another, both can easily overcome the conquest. Brazil only needs to fight Gran Colombian troops with reinforcements from the Mexicans though. 3 stars-USA/Prussia Prussia has evolved to 3 stars after Napoleon’s first exile which makes it an even major player than it once was before. USA’s tactics can be a scorched earth retreat and counterattack, by capturing and capitulating Canada then moving on lend leasing the allies in Europe, Africa and South America to at least handle a Front on their own while simultaneously invading South America and then Spain/ Britain. This is currently the hardest conquest for the French Eagle faction so it’s reasonable for players to play the Coalition side.  Naples confirmed as easy S Rank |
|
|
|
Post by Admiral Aleksandr Kolchak on Aug 26, 2018 7:09:20 GMT
U sure about Prussia? Seems pretty impossible to survive initial french assault
|
|
|
|
Post by Robert Walpole on Aug 26, 2018 9:48:11 GMT
I take back my word in the Prussian one. It seems that the French can summon a Grandee Armee at round 10 or so which steamrolls Spain and Central Europe. It is advise to play as the Ottoman Empire instead as playing a 3 star Coalition country
|
|
|
|
Post by Storm on Aug 26, 2018 12:48:23 GMT
The thing is that with Denmark and Bavaria switching sides (surprisingly Italy didn’t change sides) the French Side is at its weakest. So 1815 is a Coalitionfest. But something tells me that France has a Trump Card. However, with Gran Colombia and Brazil joining in (it doesn’t even match that Gran Colombia is supposed to be at war with the Spanish’s Empire trying to gain its independence and that it would be logical that Gran Colombia is a French Ally) it seems that the coalition is at a massive advantage. The front in North America is still the same with the difference that there are no British troops in Canada. 1 Star- Bavaria/Naples Both are 1812 French Eagle hotspots and can work well depending on your strategy. With lend leasing and such, the American Front and the African Front can change. 2 stars- Denmark/Sweden/Brazil Only to face one front while lend leasing allies to take another, both can easily overcome the conquest. Brazil only needs to fight Gran Colombian troops with reinforcements from the Mexicans though. 3 stars-USA/Prussia Prussia has evolved to 3 stars after Napoleon’s first exile which makes it an even major player than it once was before. USA’s tactics can be a scorched earth retreat and counterattack, by capturing and capitulating Canada then moving on lend leasing the allies in Europe, Africa and South America to at least handle a Front on their own while simultaneously invading South America and then Spain/ Britain. This is currently the hardest conquest for the French Eagle faction so it’s reasonable for players to play the Coalition side. Naples confirmed as easy S Rank   Algeria Also easy |
|
|
|
Post by andrei on Aug 26, 2018 14:35:33 GMT
So French side is stronger?
|
|
|
|
Post by Robert Walpole on Aug 26, 2018 14:42:21 GMT
So French side is stronger? Judging on how they can spawn Grenadiers from low tier cities yes. France itself singlehandedly outpowered the Spanish and Central European Front without any lend lease and can handle its economy well. |
|
|
|
Post by Robert Walpole on Aug 26, 2018 14:43:04 GMT
They have inherited it from their American friends
|
|
|
|
Post by Storm on Aug 26, 2018 14:43:48 GMT
So French side is stronger? Definitely as the FRENCH can summon so many elites to crush Spain and Prussia while you must help destroy th Austrians and Russians while their troops are in Prussia. However you must fund Brazil and the USA to shorten the length of the war. |
|
