|
|
Post by Robert Walpole on Aug 23, 2018 12:59:46 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Nobunaga Oda on Aug 23, 2018 15:16:23 GMT
Far worse than her EW4 counterpart. At least players can use her for resource management then, compared to now where she's ALMOST useless. |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich โFried Riceโ Paulus on Aug 23, 2018 15:31:55 GMT
Far worse than her EW4 counterpart. At least players can use her for resource management then, compared to now where she's ALMOST useless. Extremely easy to use though, but bad overall. Jourdan the early game god will never be replaced |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich โFried Riceโ Paulus on Aug 23, 2018 15:36:35 GMT
Far worse than her EW4 counterpart. At least players can use her for resource management then, compared to now where she's ALMOST useless. Extremely easy to use though, but bad overall. Jourdan the early game god will never be replaced Except for Sophia apparently. Rip Jourdan 2018-2018 |
|
|
|
Post by Iosef Stalin on Aug 26, 2018 19:51:30 GMT
Bad. But easy to use.
|
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich โFried Riceโ Paulus on Aug 26, 2018 20:06:58 GMT
How come both Kate and Fatimah only have lvl 1 plain fighting haha
|
|
|
|
Post by Cyrus the Great on Feb 15, 2019 1:34:34 GMT
why would you need a general like this. 2 star
|
|
|
|
Post by yuanzhong on Feb 15, 2019 2:39:00 GMT
I don't think she's bad although I didn't buy her. My problem is the number of slots  (Suvorov, Alexander I also out). Very unique general when you can use her everywhere on land. She's evarage good general IMO. P/S: I also disagree that she's worse than her EW4 version. In EW4, she's easily replaced by any gen with Architect equipping Napoleon code; but in EW6, you can't find anyone else who can do well on all terrain in Artillery like her |
|
|
|
Post by Cyrus the Great on Feb 15, 2019 2:47:44 GMT
I don't think she's bad although I didn't buy her. My problem is the number of slots (Suvorov, Alexander I also out). Very unique general when you can use her everywhere on land. She's evarage good general IMO. P/S: I also disagree that she's worse than her EW4 version. In EW4, she's easily replaced by any gen with Architect equipping Napoleon code; but in EW6, you can't find anyone else who can do well on all terrain in Artillery like her I think the problem in EW4 with a lot of people is that Napoleonic Code is better to them. The skills in EW6 are unique for artillery, but what situation is it needed? |
|
|
|
Post by yuanzhong on Feb 15, 2019 3:03:12 GMT
I don't think she's bad although I didn't buy her. My problem is the number of slots (Suvorov, Alexander I also out). Very unique general when you can use her everywhere on land. She's evarage good general IMO. P/S: I also disagree that she's worse than her EW4 version. In EW4, she's easily replaced by any gen with Architect equipping Napoleon code; but in EW6, you can't find anyone else who can do well on all terrain in Artillery like her I think the problem in EW4 with a lot of people is that Napoleonic Code is better to them. The skills in EW6 are unique for artillery, but what situation is it needed? When you need Empress consort for your Napoleon or Mahmud II or Alexander I and very special General (for collecting purpose) |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 15, 2019 4:18:33 GMT
why would you need a general like this. 2 star She's cute. 6/5. 1 star for usefulness |
|
|
|
Post by Taizong of Tang on Feb 17, 2019 2:50:29 GMT
Can be good hybrid for her battle ability.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 17, 2019 3:59:47 GMT
Can be good hybrid for her battle ability. Sadly, this isn't EW4 where hybrids rule supreme  |
|
|
|
Post by silvercreek on Feb 24, 2019 6:42:52 GMT
Definitely, a palace princess,she has that healing aura skill.
Give her tulips and nothing else.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 25, 2019 2:17:52 GMT
Definitely, a palace princess,she has that healing aura skill. Give her tulips and nothing else. Good for some hard campaigns surely. |
|
(Suvorov, Alexander I also out).
