|
|
Post by Robert Walpole on Sept 7, 2018 12:29:22 GMT
Completing with one star is possible with any team. There is no any reason to discuss most suitable lineup for such a completion  What if you beat crimean war 1 star no navy generals, and then once you beat everything else in the game, you sell two of your land generals for two navy generals, and then beat everything else you couldn’t without any naval generals. It could be a smart move. But Hey, IAP general slots still work a charm |
|
|
|
Post by andrei on Sept 7, 2018 12:38:30 GMT
Completing with one star is possible with any team. There is no any reason to discuss most suitable lineup for such a completion What if you beat crimean war 1 star no navy generals, and then once you beat everything else in the game, you sell two of your land generals for two navy generals, and then beat everything else you couldn’t without any naval generals. It could be a smart move. This is exactly what stoic did to beat some challenge missions in Hundred Days war and Spanish war. He was dismissing some gens to have enough inf/cav gens to receive 3 stars. I assume this is the only way for players using only 8 gens. With navy bad thing is that You don't need them anymore. But many players still like to play conquests after the game is complete. And these navy gens are bad for conquests. |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Sept 7, 2018 12:45:34 GMT
What if you beat crimean war 1 star no navy generals, and then once you beat everything else in the game, you sell two of your land generals for two navy generals, and then beat everything else you couldn’t without any naval generals. It could be a smart move. This is exactly what stoic did to beat some challenge missions in Hundred Days war and Spanish war. He was dismissing some gens to have enough inf/cav gens to receive 3 stars. I assume this is the only way for players using only 8 gens. With navy bad thing is that You don't need them anymore. But many players still like to play conquests after the game is complete. And these navy gens are bad for conquests. Agree. Only ones with tactics master are good for conquest as they can navy raid. |
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Sept 7, 2018 16:20:09 GMT
What if you beat crimean war 1 star no navy generals, and then once you beat everything else in the game, you sell two of your land generals for two navy generals, and then beat everything else you couldn’t without any naval generals. It could be a smart move. This is exactly what stoic did to beat some challenge missions in Hundred Days war and Spanish war. He was dismissing some gens to have enough inf/cav gens to receive 3 stars. I assume this is the only way for players using only 8 gens. With navy bad thing is that You don't need them anymore. But many players still like to play conquests after the game is complete. And these navy gens are bad for conquests. Well, I would mind to have Nelson for 1806 conquest as Denmark  About 3 stars in naval battles of the Crimean war... Well I'm not yet sure about Baltic campaign, but I completed Black sea campaign without Admirals. And all my generals are still Major-Generals. The key was to keep my ships near Graham...   At least I will try to do it in Baltic campaign as well. If this will be possible, I think we don't need naval princesses at all. All other naval battles could be easily completed without Admirals... |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Sept 7, 2018 18:16:53 GMT
Alexander >>> Nelson
|
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Sept 7, 2018 18:23:55 GMT
To think over your strategy >>> not to think over your strategy  |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Sept 8, 2018 0:47:16 GMT
The fewer generals you have, the better the quality. For example, there are only 2 tents, two ambulances... I’d rather have Blucher with ambulance rather than 2 murats with a battlefield medpack.
|
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Sept 8, 2018 1:41:21 GMT
The fewer generals you have, the better the quality. For example, there are only 2 tents, two ambulances... I’d rather have Blucher with ambulance rather than 2 murats with a battlefield medpack. Well, you have 2 tents and 2 ambulances notwithstanding how many generals you have . The quality will not suffer. You simply add up other generals to your best generals In other words you can have Blucher with ambulance AND "two Murats" with medpacks. It is not either/or situation for those players who have more than 8 generals... |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Sept 8, 2018 2:13:47 GMT
The fewer generals you have, the better the quality. For example, there are only 2 tents, two ambulances... I’d rather have Blucher with ambulance rather than 2 murats with a battlefield medpack. Well, you have 2 tents and 2 ambulances notwithstanding how many generals you have . The quality will not suffer. You simply add up other generals to your best generals In other words you can have Blucher with ambulance AND "two Murats" with medpacks. It is not either/or situation for those players who have more than 8 generals... Thats true, but with many generals, you should play as cautiously as possible, as the rest of your generals will heal super slowly, if not at all. But if you can kill the enemy quickly enough, I suppose you won’t take too much damage. But still for beginners, I recommend very few generals as you will be amazed to see how far you can get just from massena karl and barclay. Point is, make sure you can upgrade your generals at least somewhat then buy new ones. |
|
|
|
Post by andrei on Sept 8, 2018 5:38:29 GMT
This is exactly what stoic did to beat some challenge missions in Hundred Days war and Spanish war. He was dismissing some gens to have enough inf/cav gens to receive 3 stars. I assume this is the only way for players using only 8 gens. With navy bad thing is that You don't need them anymore. But many players still like to play conquests after the game is complete. And these navy gens are bad for conquests. Well, I would mind to have Nelson for 1806 conquest as Denmark About 3 stars in naval battles of the Crimean war... Well I'm not yet sure about Baltic campaign, but I completed Black sea campaign without Admirals. And all my generals are still Major-Generals. The key was to keep my ships near Graham... At least I will try to do it in Baltic campaign as well. If this will be possible, I think we don't need naval princesses at all. All other naval battles could be easily completed without Admirals... I doubt about 3* for Baltic campaign without admirals. I barely completed it for 3* with Nelson and Senyavin. Not from the 1st try Maybe Marshal ranks for the gens can help but imo Escorting is very important in this mission. Is it the last one difficult navy mission? |
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Sept 8, 2018 8:21:45 GMT
Well, I would mind to have Nelson for 1806 conquest as Denmark About 3 stars in naval battles of the Crimean war... Well I'm not yet sure about Baltic campaign, but I completed Black sea campaign without Admirals. And all my generals are still Major-Generals. The key was to keep my ships near Graham... At least I will try to do it in Baltic campaign as well. If this will be possible, I think we don't need naval princesses at all. All other naval battles could be easily completed without Admirals... I doubt about 3* for Baltic campaign without admirals. I barely completed it for 3* with Nelson and Senyavin. Not from the 1st try Maybe Marshal ranks for the gens can help but imo Escorting is very important in this mission. Is it the last one difficult navy mission? I would say it is the only one difficult naval mission |
|
|
|
Post by andrei on Sept 8, 2018 8:32:38 GMT
I doubt about 3* for Baltic campaign without admirals. I barely completed it for 3* with Nelson and Senyavin. Not from the 1st try Maybe Marshal ranks for the gens can help but imo Escorting is very important in this mission. Is it the last one difficult navy mission? I would say it is the only one difficult naval mission Naval are just more difficult than the rest except those inf/cav ban missions |
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Sept 8, 2018 8:59:52 GMT
I would say it is the only one difficult naval mission Naval are just more difficult than the rest except those inf/cav ban missions Yeah. The last two ones are relatively easy. It is possible to build ships in Caucasus campaign, but honestly we don't need them. And dozens of AI's ships are simply watching how our generals move from one target to the next |
|
|
|
Post by Louis Gabriel Suchet on Feb 12, 2019 1:11:18 GMT
Maria, Sakurako and Lan  Maria British campaign, Lan S Rank 1812, Sakurako I don’t rememeber. Which country would you recommend using to complete 1812 S rank? Somehow, someway (without Dabrowski) I managed to beat France 1812 yesterday... But I only got A rank... RIP. Do you think I should try France again? Or should I try a different country (preferably a 2 or 1 star that is easy, also please post link to guide, or your own tips)? |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Feb 12, 2019 2:39:36 GMT
Maria British campaign, Lan S Rank 1812, Sakurako I don’t rememeber. Which country would you recommend using to complete 1812 S rank? Somehow, someway (without Dabrowski) I managed to beat France 1812 yesterday... But I only got A rank... RIP. Do you think I should try France again? Or should I try a different country (preferably a 2 or 1 star that is easy, also please post link to guide, or your own tips)? Spain, Morocco, and Sweden are my go tos |
|
