|
|
Post by mexie on Apr 18, 2019 3:20:41 GMT
 He could have been our 3rd doom Horseman,Murat/Dabrowski and him...just think of the damage... |
|
|
|
Post by Seger on Apr 18, 2019 11:07:39 GMT
The only thing is that you unfortunately can't even play the country
|
|
|
|
Post by Nobunaga Oda on Apr 18, 2019 12:35:18 GMT
So to the cav gens, he is like what Alexander I is to the arty gens.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gone on Aug 22, 2019 1:29:03 GMT
Like Emmanuel IV, he is a really good general that unfortunately isn’t purchasable. At least Emmanuel is playable.
|
|
|
|
Post by SolidLight on Oct 30, 2019 9:52:40 GMT
I still wouldn’t get this guy even if I could buy him.
|
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Oct 30, 2019 11:00:36 GMT
I still wouldn’t get this guy even if I could buy him. Even if he was king rank at max? |
|
|
|
Post by Gone on Oct 30, 2019 16:13:47 GMT
I still wouldn’t get this guy even if I could buy him. Even if he was king rank at max? Personally, I would get him. I’d rather buy him over Lan. She’s great, but I’m a guy that values Aura a lot. Yes, Kevin, I overrate it. Yes, Kevin, you can bash me. |
|
|
|
Post by SolidLight on Oct 30, 2019 16:49:02 GMT
Even if he was king rank at max? Personally, I would get him. I’d rather buy him over Lan. She’s great, but I’m a guy that values Aura a lot. Yes, Kevin, I overrate it. Yes, Kevin, you can bash me. It's not so much that I don't like Aura. I just that I don't like most of the people who has it. |
|
|
|
Post by Gone on Oct 30, 2019 21:19:49 GMT
Personally, I would get him. I’d rather buy him over Lan. She’s great, but I’m a guy that values Aura a lot. Yes, Kevin, I overrate it. Yes, Kevin, you can bash me. It's not so much that I don't like Aura. I just that I don't like most of the people who has it. What do you mean by “don’t like most of the people who has it”? |
|
|
|
Post by SolidLight on Oct 30, 2019 22:12:03 GMT
It's not so much that I don't like Aura. I just that I don't like most of the people who has it. What do you mean by “don’t like most of the people who has it”? Aura is pretty awesome. I just consider a good terrain skill (plain in particular) to be even better. I like Lannes and Bismarck more than Massena and Barclay, and Scharnhorst more than Alex and Mahmud. Another thing I don’t like about auras is that they only really shine if you clump your generals together. I only use one or two infantry per mission/conquest and usually also only one or two artillery. And they often need to be far from eachother. |
|
|
|
Post by Gone on Oct 30, 2019 23:10:27 GMT
What do you mean by “don’t like most of the people who has it”? Aura is pretty awesome. I just consider a good terrain skill (plain in particular) to be even better. I like Lannes and Bismarck more than Massena and Barclay, and Scharnhorst more than Alex and Mahmud. Another thing I don’t like about auras is that they only really shine if you clump your generals together. I only use one or two infantry per mission/conquest and usually also only one or two artillery. And they often need to be far from eachother. An aura general leading a swarm (Like Massena leading some grenadiers) can be pretty devastating. But I see where you’re coming from. You’re someone that assigns various generals to handle various fronts. |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Oct 31, 2019 1:46:29 GMT
Even if he was king rank at max? Personally, I would get him. I’d rather buy him over Lan. She’s great, but I’m a guy that values Aura a lot. Yes, Kevin, I overrate it. Yes, Kevin, you can bash me. I ain’t bashing you. When I only got auras my second major playthrough, it went way smoother. I would also sacrifice lan for ahmed |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Oct 31, 2019 1:49:13 GMT
What do you mean by “don’t like most of the people who has it”? Aura is pretty awesome. I just consider a good terrain skill (plain in particular) to be even better. I like Lannes and Bismarck more than Massena and Barclay, and Scharnhorst more than Alex and Mahmud. Another thing I don’t like about auras is that they only really shine if you clump your generals together. I only use one or two infantry per mission/conquest and usually also only one or two artillery. And they often need to be far from eachother. I agree, but keeping two infantry generals together is not that hard of a task to manage. Having lannes and bismarck together instead of karl and massena means sacrificing two assualt skills. However, having karl and bismarck is a perfectly understandable combo as they compliment each other very well. But if you clump 3 auras together, the common militia (for infantry) around you will hit for 60 more damage than they are supposed to, which is really op |
|
|
|
Post by Charlemagne on Nov 24, 2019 6:21:43 GMT
Aura is pretty awesome. I just consider a good terrain skill (plain in particular) to be even better. I like Lannes and Bismarck more than Massena and Barclay, and Scharnhorst more than Alex and Mahmud. Another thing I don’t like about auras is that they only really shine if you clump your generals together. I only use one or two infantry per mission/conquest and usually also only one or two artillery. And they often need to be far from eachother. An aura general leading a swarm (Like Massena leading some grenadiers) can be pretty devastating. But I see where you’re coming from. You’re someone that assigns various generals to handle various fronts. True. |
|
