|
|
Antony
Jun 28, 2019 9:48:28 GMT
Post by Seger on Jun 28, 2019 9:48:28 GMT
|
|
|
|
Antony
Jun 28, 2019 14:53:50 GMT
Post by Gone on Jun 28, 2019 14:53:50 GMT
Seems to be a good cavalry.
|
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Jun 28, 2019 15:25:54 GMT
Iron Duke was right it is definitely Steven Gerrard  
|
|
|
|
Antony
Jun 28, 2019 17:30:57 GMT
Post by Deleted on Jun 28, 2019 17:30:57 GMT
I'm not sure what breakthrough is, but i think he's going to be one of the best cavalry generals because of march. I'm going to rate him a 5 for now, and later dissect if he deserves it.
|
|
|
|
Antony
Jun 28, 2019 17:33:37 GMT
via mobile
Post by Józef Poniatowski on Jun 28, 2019 17:33:37 GMT
Breakthrough is the skill that allows a general to ignore the unit’s defense, in this case a fence.
The AI doesn’t really use these though, so to me it feels like a waste of a skill.
Not bad, but not a scipio or arminius
|
|
|
|
Antony
Jun 29, 2019 3:02:38 GMT
via mobile
Post by stoic on Jun 29, 2019 3:02:38 GMT
There was an analogues skill in EW6 (for example, Murat has it) and it was absolutely useless. It could be not so bad if AI was programmed to build those defensive constructions, but unfortunately AI never does such things. So, basically we have -1 skill. A silver cavalry general with 3 good skills will be equal to Antony therefore (with lower price though).
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 29, 2019 7:23:56 GMT
There was an analogues skill in EW6 (for example, Murat has it) and it was absolutely useless. It could be not so bad if AI was programmed to build those defensive constructions, but unfortunately AI never does such things. So, basically we have -1 skill. A silver cavalry general with 3 good skills will be equal to Antonqy therefore (with lower price though). Agreed with that logic. They'll probably compensate it by literring campaigns with trenches |
|
|
|
Antony
Jun 29, 2019 18:39:30 GMT
via mobile
Post by Józef Poniatowski on Jun 29, 2019 18:39:30 GMT
There was an analogues skill in EW6 (for example, Murat has it) and it was absolutely useless. It could be not so bad if AI was programmed to build those defensive constructions, but unfortunately AI never does such things. So, basically we have -1 skill. A silver cavalry general with 3 good skills will be equal to Antonqy therefore (with lower price though). Agreed with that logic. They'll probably compensate it by literring campaigns with trenches they do. |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Jul 11, 2019 17:25:23 GMT
Very fast, hits decently, good chance to attack again. Whats not to like?
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 11, 2019 19:38:32 GMT
Very fast, hits decently, good chance to attack again. Whats not to like? Upgrade his rank once and give him the spear. He'll be a monster |
|
|
|
Post by yuanzhong on Jul 13, 2019 13:13:01 GMT
Very fast, hits decently, good chance to attack again. Whats not to like? Upgrade his rank once and give him the spear. He'll be a monster He's a runner. Huo is the guy worth the name "monster". Sometime I think Huo even be better damage dealer than Hannibal. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 13, 2019 13:26:11 GMT
Upgrade his rank once and give him the spear. He'll be a monster He's a runner. Huo is the guy worth the name "monster". Sometime I think Huo even be better damage dealer than Hannibal. Hannibal deals more damage than huo in terms of consistency |
|
|
|
Antony
Jul 13, 2019 14:04:39 GMT
via mobile
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Jul 13, 2019 14:04:39 GMT
I think anthony is better than huo. Him attacking cities, grabbing them, and using forced march to get him from one end to the map to the other would just abuse conquest I am sure. I am considering purchasing him instead of upgrading my generals to consul
|
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Jul 13, 2019 14:05:27 GMT
He's a runner. Huo is the guy worth the name "monster". Sometime I think Huo even be better damage dealer than Hannibal. Hannibal deals more damage than huo in terms of consistency I agree, actually. I played one campaign mission, and was curious how often Mithridates will deal critical damage. Not only Mithridates, but no one else either did it at all! Yes, it was only one mission, but the point is that critical damage (though great) is somewhat inconsistent. On a positive side, it is possible to replay some difficult missions hoping that next time we will be lucky... |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 13, 2019 14:08:54 GMT
Hannibal deals more damage than huo in terms of consistency I agree, actually. I played one campaign mission, and was curious how often Mithridates will deal critical damage. Not only Mithridates, but no one else either did it at all! Yes, it was only one mission, but the point is that critical damage (though great) is somewhat inconsistent. On a positive side, it is possible to replay some difficult missions hoping that next time we will be lucky... The old EW4 strat |
|
