|
Post by NetherFreek on Sept 13, 2015 12:39:27 GMT
|
|
|
Post by kanue on Sept 13, 2015 15:06:02 GMT
Normally, I think playing as Axis and WTO countries are more interesting but I vote Allies purely because I do not want to go mopping them up.
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Sept 13, 2015 15:34:21 GMT
I vote NATO because it is pretty easy. Take over China, hit Russia from behind. There goes your two major enemies.
|
|
|
Post by saltin on Sept 14, 2015 1:38:25 GMT
If there was a mod that took out Australia and Hawaii and some of the other islands that take way too long to clear than I would have picked axis as favorite faction to play but as it is now got to pick Nato/Allies.
|
|
|
Post by General William T. Sherman on Sept 14, 2015 10:33:29 GMT
I picked Axis because I think it's so much more of a fun game to play as Italy, Japan, Hungary, etc. than the USA or GB, even though they are also fun conquests.
|
|
|
Post by Moreau on Sept 15, 2015 13:16:25 GMT
Axis, Nato and only Great britian and france in the allies
|
|
|
Post by Suvorov on Sept 15, 2015 17:31:17 GMT
WTO, just because it's a challenge and NATO don't spam paratroopers. I don't like playing NATO, it's just too easy, but I guess that's because WC3 is easier than Glory of Generals.
|
|
|
Post by Moreau on Sept 16, 2015 11:57:03 GMT
Glory of generals was hell for me
|
|
|
Post by Suvorov on Sept 17, 2015 17:54:44 GMT
I've nearly finished it, but ONLY by grinding and grinding and grinding and replaying and grinding and replaying campaign missions and legion mode missions and then I grinded some more and bought general slots and eventually I had vasilevsky, Guderian, Rommel and Zhukov (Leonid Govorov has one star more in arty, but his marching ability is crap.
|
|
|
Post by The Armchair General on Sept 19, 2015 8:27:36 GMT
Nato/allies quicker for me.
|
|
|
Post by lassalle on Sept 22, 2015 11:29:44 GMT
WTO,longer games but more fun.
|
|