|
|
Post by NetherFreek on May 21, 2018 8:30:19 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Aug 10, 2018 1:04:30 GMT
Actually a very good general for his price. He is the ludwig of the early game generals. He is the good qualities gates offers, and the good qualities clinton offers combined. However, since you are given two free infantry generals, you should only go for him if you are building your team around infantry. Nevertheless, he is very cheap. Only blue tier infantry general worth buying, as Soult and Wilhelm III are outdone by Garibaldi.
|
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Aug 10, 2018 1:06:03 GMT
Weakly recommended. Since you have two free infantry generals, a wise option would be to either get a cavarly general, or someone to buff the two.
|
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Aug 10, 2018 1:08:20 GMT
If Plain Warfare and Urban warfare stacked, he would be overpowered. Not really sure if it does. Can someone confirm this?
|
|
|
|
Post by coronel on Aug 10, 2018 17:21:15 GMT
looks great. and with a good cost
|
|
|
|
Post by Iosef Stalin on Aug 28, 2018 21:12:48 GMT
Good general for his price, but why would you get him if there are other generals.
|
|
|
|
Post by Cyrus the Great on Feb 15, 2019 1:12:12 GMT
Pretty good stats overall. But not really needed. 3 star
|
|
|
|
Post by Jeanne d'Arc on Jun 27, 2019 17:31:56 GMT
This guy was my first general on my first run with EW6. He holds a special place in my heart because so. Looking back, that was a decent decision, but I could have started going for Ney. 3 stars for this guy.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gone on Aug 23, 2019 2:29:13 GMT
He is good, but you don’t really need him. 3 stars. If the game didn’t give you free generals he would be like Messe in WC4: A good general for early game.
|
|
