|
|
Post by NetherFreek on May 25, 2018 9:13:48 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Iosef Stalin on Aug 26, 2018 0:47:27 GMT
Bad. I mean seriously. Save up some more for better generals.
|
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Aug 26, 2018 0:51:07 GMT
Costs 40 more medals than sophia
|
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Aug 28, 2018 0:46:34 GMT
Looking back, this guy is not really that bad of a general. He has 3/5 of Sophia’s skills. However, he is unluckily priced. He is quite expensive at 890 medals, which is more than sophia, and barely less than alexander.
|
|
|
|
Post by Cyrus the Great on Feb 14, 2019 2:22:13 GMT
Howe can such a bad general be worth 1000 medals? 1 star
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 14, 2019 8:12:54 GMT
Howe can such a bad general be worth 1000 medals? 1 star If he costs 500 medals less, we can consider him as an early artillery general. |
|
|
|
Post by Cyrus the Great on Feb 14, 2019 12:43:29 GMT
Howe can such a bad general be worth 1000 medals? 1 star If he costs 500 medals less, we can consider him as an early artillery general. Alex and Jourdan for early artillery |
|
|
|
Post by Gone on Aug 22, 2019 21:56:31 GMT
By himself, he is decent, but he is way too overpriced. Also can only reach Count. More expensive than Sophia and just 190 medals cheaper than Alexander I, both of which are end-game generals. 2 stars, would rate him 3 if he costed like 500 medals or less.
|
|
|
|
Post by SolidLight on Apr 10, 2020 9:10:51 GMT
Actually when thinking about it this guy could have passed for a fairly mediocre slot contender if his max title wasn’t horrible. Skillwise he’s better than Scott.
But as he is right now he’s trash, and being better than Scott is a low bar anyway.
|
|
