|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Sept 16, 2018 20:39:14 GMT
This is a general that I would like to see more discussion about. To begin with, he costs 8 emblems, has good stars, and nice skills for infantry (no mass fire or leadership keep in mind), and architecture
So the question is, is he good enough to consider buying, assuming you have the emblems. Or would you rather get someone else. Anyway this is an informative poll I want to see how everyone feels about him.
Competition:
8 emblems: Davout, Washington (actually very similar to dearborn, just has mass fire, leadership, and economic master instead of architecture, bugle, and formation), Lannes, Wellesley (also very similar).
Noniap: Fatimah, Koscuisko
|
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Sept 16, 2018 20:40:45 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Iosef Stalin on Sept 17, 2018 2:49:26 GMT
Any of the generals above would be tied with Dearborn.
|
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Sept 17, 2018 2:58:10 GMT
Any of the generals above would be tied with Dearborn. He is quite good i won’t lie. But Koscuisko does exist, and he is noniap |
|
|
|
Post by Charlemagne on Sept 18, 2018 4:14:35 GMT
Any of the generals above would be tied with Dearborn. He is quite good i won’t lie. But Koscuisko does exist, and he is noniap Dearborn is better at combat by far. |
|
|
|
Post by Charlemagne on Sept 18, 2018 4:20:39 GMT
This is a general that I would like to see more discussion about. To begin with, he costs 8 emblems, has good stars, and nice skills for infantry (no mass fire or leadership keep in mind), and architecture So the question is, is he good enough to consider buying, assuming you have the emblems. Or would you rather get someone else. Anyway this is an informative poll I want to see how everyone feels about him. Competition: 8 emblems: Davout, Washington (actually very similar to dearborn, just has mass fire, leadership, and economic master instead of architecture, bugle, and formation), Lannes, Wellesley (also very similar). Noniap: Fatimah, Koscuisko Worth it but you could get suvorov and give him boots for 6 emblems. |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Sept 18, 2018 11:43:22 GMT
This is a general that I would like to see more discussion about. To begin with, he costs 8 emblems, has good stars, and nice skills for infantry (no mass fire or leadership keep in mind), and architecture So the question is, is he good enough to consider buying, assuming you have the emblems. Or would you rather get someone else. Anyway this is an informative poll I want to see how everyone feels about him. Competition: 8 emblems: Davout, Washington (actually very similar to dearborn, just has mass fire, leadership, and economic master instead of architecture, bugle, and formation), Lannes, Wellesley (also very similar). Noniap: Fatimah, Koscuisko Worth it but you could get suvorov and give him boots for 6 emblems. I don’t think its fair to compete Dearborn with Suvorov, because Dearborn is an econ general, whereas suvorov is a plain fighting general. But yeah. You are right, suvorov comes with many benefits |
|
|
|
Post by Charlemagne on Sept 18, 2018 22:41:26 GMT
Worth it but you could get suvorov and give him boots for 6 emblems. I don’t think its fair to compete Dearborn with Suvorov, because Dearborn is an econ general, whereas suvorov is a plain fighting general. But yeah. You are right, suvorov comes with many benefits My purpose for dearborn is capture cities and upgrade them for half price. |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Sept 19, 2018 2:25:47 GMT
I don’t think its fair to compete Dearborn with Suvorov, because Dearborn is an econ general, whereas suvorov is a plain fighting general. But yeah. You are right, suvorov comes with many benefits My purpose for dearborn is capture cities and upgrade them for half price. Agreed. That’s the same reason I use Koscuisko, and his defense art makes him quite tanky at holding them. But he does have many things in his favor. |
|
|
|
Post by Charlemagne on Sept 19, 2018 3:32:47 GMT
My purpose for dearborn is capture cities and upgrade them for half price. Agreed. That’s the same reason I use Koscuisko, and his defense art makes him quite tanky at holding them. But he does have many things in his favor. True, exept kosiusko lacks combat ability but dearborn has it. |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Sept 19, 2018 14:29:08 GMT
Agreed. That’s the same reason I use Koscuisko, and his defense art makes him quite tanky at holding them. But he does have many things in his favor. True, exept kosiusko lacks combat ability but dearborn has it. Correct. Give him napoleonic code and a snare drum and he might as well be an econ suvorov. So the general consensus is that he is good, right? |
|
|
|
Post by Charlemagne on Sept 20, 2018 3:36:41 GMT
True, exept kosiusko lacks combat ability but dearborn has it. Correct. Give him napoleonic code and a snare drum and he might as well be an econ suvorov. So the general consensus is that he is good, right? I'd rather take fatimah than kosiuzko cuz you dont need napoleonic code for her. You could give her snare drum and quality saddle and get movement to 5. |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Jan 31, 2019 23:29:15 GMT
I don’t think he is worth it. Be warned
|
|
|
|
Post by Arya Stark on Feb 1, 2019 1:08:14 GMT
I don’t think he is worth it. Be warned Just a waste of emblems. For 8 emblems, you can get Dobeln (3 emblems) and Kosckiusko (3 as well) AND you would have 2 left over so... |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Feb 1, 2019 1:23:17 GMT
I don’t think he is worth it. Be warned Just a waste of emblems. For 8 emblems, you can get Dobeln (3 emblems) and Kosckiusko (3 as well) AND you would have 2 left over so... If you buy him by himself and nobody else, I can see how he would be a good buy cuz he will essentially be suvorov jr with an investment of a snare drum. However, if he is out fighting, his architecture skill will be useless. If you buy him with a couple others, he will be obsolete towards end game, as victoria desperately wants the last slot. Yeah. I can see how he would be good, but I would never choose him over Davout, Nelson, Lannes, Wellesley, Radetsky, or Washington. Just way better options other there. Even Kutuzov I would purchase prior to him because Kutuzov has much more flexibility. Dearborn has 5 stars movement though, which is never worth overlooking as it is insanely frustrating to train. But overall, I think that he is a meh choice. |
|
