|
|
Post by Charlemagne on Sept 27, 2018 3:14:10 GMT
I know that these are both economic generalsand both have leadership. Wellington is better at combat whereas Washington is better at defending cities and movement. Who is better?
|
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Sept 30, 2018 2:52:48 GMT
I know that these are both economic generalsand both have leadership. Wellington is better at combat whereas Washington is better at defending cities and movement. Who is better? This one comes down to personal preference. If you like bugle more than mass fire get wellesley. If not get washington. Washington does have 5 training stars compared to wellesley’s 3. But if you shove a snare drum on wellesley, he might as well be the best infantry general in the game. |
|
|
|
Post by Charlemagne on Sept 30, 2018 20:14:54 GMT
I know that these are both economic generalsand both have leadership. Wellington is better at combat whereas Washington is better at defending cities and movement. Who is better? This one comes down to personal preference. If you like bugle more than mass fire get wellesley. If not get washington. Washington does have 5 training stars compared to wellesley’s 3. But if you shove a snare drum on wellesley, he might as well be the best infantry general in the game. I still think washington for the movement and the fact that empty cities can easily get income with him and wellesley. Banner is less of a waste for him too exept there is no way youd give any of them a flag. But yeah, personal preferance. |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Oct 1, 2018 0:59:29 GMT
This one comes down to personal preference. If you like bugle more than mass fire get wellesley. If not get washington. Washington does have 5 training stars compared to wellesley’s 3. But if you shove a snare drum on wellesley, he might as well be the best infantry general in the game. I still think washington for the movement and the fact that empty cities can easily get income with him and wellesley. Banner is less of a waste for him too exept there is no way youd give any of them a flag. But yeah, personal preferance. You can train movement (tall boots and diez), but as you have said before, you can’t add bugle with any items. But you are right. For a beginning player, washington might seem like the better choice due to his mass fire. But yeah I agree, both good in their regard. They essentially have basically the same skill set, except with a different infantry skill, both of which are desirable infantry skills btw. However, I personally believe that Lannes would be a better choice over Washington as Lannes has assault art. |
|
|
|
Post by Charlemagne on Oct 1, 2018 4:05:33 GMT
I still think washington for the movement and the fact that empty cities can easily get income with him and wellesley. Banner is less of a waste for him too exept there is no way youd give any of them a flag. But yeah, personal preferance. You can train movement (tall boots and diez), but as you have said before, you can’t add bugle with any items. But you are right. For a beginning player, washington might seem like the better choice due to his mass fire. But yeah I agree, both good in their regard. They essentially have basically the same skill set, except with a different infantry skill, both of which are desirable infantry skills btw. However, I personally believe that Lannes would be a better choice over Washington as Lannes has assault art. I have lannes and i dont like his combat |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Oct 1, 2018 11:57:16 GMT
You can train movement (tall boots and diez), but as you have said before, you can’t add bugle with any items. But you are right. For a beginning player, washington might seem like the better choice due to his mass fire. But yeah I agree, both good in their regard. They essentially have basically the same skill set, except with a different infantry skill, both of which are desirable infantry skills btw. However, I personally believe that Lannes would be a better choice over Washington as Lannes has assault art. I have lannes and i dont like his combat Why not? His output isn’t huge but he is very hard to kill. Even my Davout has trouble taking him on. |
|
|
|
Post by Charlemagne on Oct 2, 2018 23:25:44 GMT
I have lannes and i dont like his combat Why not? His output isn’t huge but he is very hard to kill. Even my Davout has trouble taking him on. Do you have him? Im thinking of regrouping him and getting lan and victoria who im very close to |
|
|
|
Post by waffles on Oct 27, 2018 5:38:16 GMT
I would only regroup him when you get Victoria as she has both assault art and defence art, along with lannes' mass fire, and his bugle. she is a combination of Wellington, Washington and lannes.
|
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Oct 27, 2018 19:12:36 GMT
Why not? His output isn’t huge but he is very hard to kill. Even my Davout has trouble taking him on. Do you have him? Im thinking of regrouping him and getting lan and victoria who im very close to I wouldn’t regroup him, just buy an extra slot. I would love to have lannes instead of victoria. |
|
|
|
Post by Charlemagne on Oct 28, 2018 5:36:02 GMT
Do you have him? Im thinking of regrouping him and getting lan and victoria who im very close to I wouldn’t regroup him, just buy an extra slot. I would love to have lannes instead of victoria. Thanks. In lannes vs victoria it just depends on personal preference. |
|
