|
|
Post by General William T. Sherman on Nov 30, 2015 11:24:42 GMT
I personally prefer the U.K because it has access to every single opposing country, yet it's so much more fun personally.
|
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Nov 30, 2015 12:14:32 GMT
I prefer the Brits.
|
|
|
|
Post by NetherFreek on Nov 30, 2015 15:02:14 GMT
uk = easier
hre = faster
|
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Nov 30, 2015 15:06:40 GMT
I personally prefer the U.K because it has access to every single opposing country, yet it's so much more fun personally. Yes but in terms of speed, HRE is better. I was only able to do Britain in 33 turns with 750. It doesn't start out with enough income to accumulate enough resources to get extra years ruled |
|
|
|
Post by kanue on Nov 30, 2015 16:07:00 GMT
GB. HRE is sooo boring. But to get Lan and Victoria, I have no choice but HRE.
|
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Nov 30, 2015 16:43:25 GMT
UK is winning guys (till the time I am writing this)
|
|
|
|
Post by Suvorov on Nov 30, 2015 17:04:01 GMT
I only did 1798 because I could play with Suvorov  , but Russia is really far away from the front. Still, I got Maria, Sakurako, Fatimah and Isabella (!) UK can be more fun, but eventually it's all about the Princesses. Therefore, my vote is HRE |
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Nov 30, 2015 17:07:20 GMT
I only did 1798 because I could play with Suvorov , but Russia is really far away from the front. Still, I got Maria, Sakurako, Fatimah and Isabella (!) so Your vote is? |
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Nov 30, 2015 19:58:30 GMT
Don't get me wrong, I love 1798 GB. I find it much more enjoyable. But the title says for speed so that why I chose HRE
|
|
, but Russia is really far away from the front. Still, I got Maria, Sakurako, Fatimah and Isabella (!)
