|
|
Kutuzov
Jan 27, 2019 22:45:12 GMT
via mobile
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Jan 27, 2019 22:45:12 GMT
Can some play EW4 using the given @mikhailkutuzov for experimental purposes. He is really good imo, just doesn’t really match anyone’s playstyle. I feel like he deserves more appreciation. All 4 of his skills are quite good.
Plus early on, a snail drum is obtainable.
|
|
|
|
Post by Arya Stark on Jan 28, 2019 10:59:46 GMT
Can some play EW4 using the given @mikhailkutuzov for experimental purposes. He is really good imo, just doesn’t really match anyone’s playstyle. I feel like he deserves more appreciation. All 4 of his skills are quite good. Plus early on, a snail drum is obtainable. I agree with that he's good and doesn't really match anyone's play style... he's a very interesting defense commander. That said, if he had Mass Fire instead of Formation he'd be a bit better |
|
|
|
Post by Arya Stark on Jan 28, 2019 14:30:01 GMT
I think my biggest turn off with Kutuzov is the fact that he costs 8 emblems, and for a commander like him thats a bit much. If I want a 5 star fort commander, I'll buy Wurmser for medals. If I want a good defending Infantry commander I'll buy Wellesley for 8 emblems as well (And Wellesley at least has both leadership and Econ Master)
|
|
|
|
Kutuzov
Jan 28, 2019 14:35:23 GMT
via mobile
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Jan 28, 2019 14:35:23 GMT
I think my biggest turn off with Kutuzov is the fact that he costs 8 emblems, and for a commander like him thats a bit much. If I want a 5 star fort commander, I'll buy Wurmser for medals. If I want a good defending Infantry commander I'll buy Wellesley for 8 emblems as well (And Wellesley at least has both leadership and Econ Master) I agree, Wellesley is a bit better than Kutuzov. But kutuzov is so good at attacking units inside of cities. I agree, 8 emblems is very expensive. |
|
|
|
Kutuzov
Jan 28, 2019 14:37:11 GMT
via mobile
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Jan 28, 2019 14:37:11 GMT
Can some play EW4 using the given @mikhailkutuzov for experimental purposes. He is really good imo, just doesn’t really match anyone’s playstyle. I feel like he deserves more appreciation. All 4 of his skills are quite good. Plus early on, a snail drum is obtainable. I agree with that he's good and doesn't really match anyone's play style... he's a very interesting defense commander. That said, if he had Mass Fire instead of Formation he'd be a bit better That’s the challenge imo. Hence why I want a skilled player to be able to utilize kutuzov in beating the game. He is a very interesting general to use. |
|
|
|
Post by Arya Stark on Jan 28, 2019 14:39:32 GMT
I think my biggest turn off with Kutuzov is the fact that he costs 8 emblems, and for a commander like him thats a bit much. If I want a 5 star fort commander, I'll buy Wurmser for medals. If I want a good defending Infantry commander I'll buy Wellesley for 8 emblems as well (And Wellesley at least has both leadership and Econ Master) I agree, Wellesley is a bit better than Kutuzov. But kutuzov is so good at attacking units inside of cities. I agree, 8 emblems is very expensive. He's one of the best Infantry commanders when it comes to attacking cities. But in my case, I tend to use infantry (Especially Line Infantry) to hold cities, so in my case he would be more useful on defense |
|
|
|
Post by Arya Stark on Jan 28, 2019 14:40:04 GMT
I agree with that he's good and doesn't really match anyone's play style... he's a very interesting defense commander. That said, if he had Mass Fire instead of Formation he'd be a bit better That’s the challenge imo. Hence why I want a skilled player to be able to utilize kutuzov in beating the game. He is a very interesting general to use. He has 3 stars mobility so one could use that that to their advantage. |
|
|
|
Post by Arya Stark on Jan 28, 2019 14:42:42 GMT
That’s the challenge imo. Hence why I want a skilled player to be able to utilize kutuzov in beating the game. He is a very interesting general to use. He has 3 stars mobility so one could use that that to their advantage. imo If I could, I would consider buying him. All my commanders (Ney, Scharnhorst, Ushakov, Sulkowski, and Sophia) are fairly mobile on land, so now that I'm thinking of that, I could use him to blitz any enemies in campaigns |
|
|
|
Post by Nobunaga Oda on Jan 28, 2019 18:32:31 GMT
If you want, try to use him in Russia 1806 (on 3X Guards) and 1809 (on 2X Guards), he deals very good dmg (high 30s to 50s, even up to low 60s).
If Formation boosts dmg of a unit with formation aka stacked units, then using Kutuzov on inf is still a good deal, given his 3 hex movement.
He moves as fast as cav, but with compulsory Geography when on inf, and hits quite hard too.
Of course, there are better options (Sophia/Döbeln with speed upgrade) and his price is high.
|
|
|
|
Post by Arya Stark on Jan 28, 2019 18:46:51 GMT
If you want, try to use him in Russia 1806 (on 3X Guards) and 1809 (on 2X Guards), he deals very good dmg (high 30s to 50s, even up to low 60s). If Formation boosts dmg of a unit with formation aka stacked units, then using Kutuzov on inf is still a good deal, given his 3 hex movement. He moves as fast as cav, but with compulsory Geography when on inf, and hits quite hard too. Of course, there are better options (Sophia/Döbeln with speed upgrade) and his price is high. True, but if you are going to constantly attack with him, as his health will be whittled down, he loses effectiveness. (Assuming he doesn't have the snare drum) In that case, a Lannes with upgraded movement would be better on attack |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Jan 28, 2019 21:43:04 GMT
If you want, try to use him in Russia 1806 (on 3X Guards) and 1809 (on 2X Guards), he deals very good dmg (high 30s to 50s, even up to low 60s). If Formation boosts dmg of a unit with formation aka stacked units, then using Kutuzov on inf is still a good deal, given his 3 hex movement. He moves as fast as cav, but with compulsory Geography when on inf, and hits quite hard too. Of course, there are better options (Sophia/Döbeln with speed upgrade) and his price is high. True, but if you are going to constantly attack with him, as his health will be whittled down, he loses effectiveness. (Assuming he doesn't have the snare drum) In that case, a Lannes with upgraded movement would be better on attack I agree, Lannes is so good. He hits in the 70s with assualt art |
|
|
|
Kutuzov
Jan 28, 2019 21:44:18 GMT
via mobile
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Jan 28, 2019 21:44:18 GMT
If you want, try to use him in Russia 1806 (on 3X Guards) and 1809 (on 2X Guards), he deals very good dmg (high 30s to 50s, even up to low 60s). If Formation boosts dmg of a unit with formation aka stacked units, then using Kutuzov on inf is still a good deal, given his 3 hex movement. He moves as fast as cav, but with compulsory Geography when on inf, and hits quite hard too. Of course, there are better options (Sophia/Döbeln with speed upgrade) and his price is high. I have definitely enjoyed his company in those conquests. When fighting him, he scares me more than Suvorov. Russia definitely has some of the best infantry generals. |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Jan 28, 2019 23:54:46 GMT
This actually sounds like a lot of fun. I’ll try it in Summer. Even funnier would be to get a general like Jackson and beat the game with him
|
|
|
|
Post by Arya Stark on Jan 29, 2019 12:14:11 GMT
This actually sounds like a lot of fun. I’ll try it in Summer. Even funnier would be to get a general like Jackson and beat the game with him Oh boy Jackson would be even more of a challenge |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Jan 30, 2019 1:49:50 GMT
This actually sounds like a lot of fun. I’ll try it in Summer. Even funnier would be to get a general like Jackson and beat the game with him Oh boy Jackson would be even more of a challenge Definitely. He is awful : ) |
|
