|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Mar 9, 2016 0:30:10 GMT
Sebastiani is just for example... Im not using him. I mind is a generals that can accomplish their job in sea battles. And my generals are Sophia, Isabela, Kate and Sakurako. I dont have Sebastiany at all but all my gens are 2-5 star in navy, so 4 gens are enough just buy propeller for most British campaign. And about final battle, its preety hard on first try but after this... It become possible. Just play depensive in North and in south, after capturing city there and other city with market, bring general with rocket launcher to kill napoleon and the other general will take the other... And About sakurako, shes gonna be great if train 5* in everything. I notice it when i got victoria(bugle&massfire)=sakurako(bugle&snaredrum). And i prefer sakurako than her when i regroup her for victoria.But my favorite is Assault art. No doubt on that. Sakurako... If you think you cannot get Lan you can give her some cavalry stars. Victoria it good at both infantry and navy since she has Defense Art(but you need to s&l). |
|
|
|
Post by Black Heart on Mar 9, 2016 1:36:47 GMT
I got Lan first before Victoria. So i regroup Sakurako when i got Lan and regroup Kate when i got Victoria. Since I dont use infantry, for my opinion Sakurako > Victoria, the only good thing in victoria are navy stars and assault art.And I need navy gen after the loss of Kate.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Mar 9, 2016 1:40:44 GMT
I got Lan first before Victoria. So i regroup Sakurako when i got Lan and regroup Kate when i got Victoria. Since I dont use infantry, for my opinion Sakurako > Victoria, the only good thing in victoria are navy stars and assault art.And I need navy gen after the loss of Kate. Victoria will change your mind about infantry. She can work almost as well as Cavalry. |
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Mar 9, 2016 1:53:02 GMT
I got Lan first before Victoria. So i regroup Sakurako when i got Lan and regroup Kate when i got Victoria. Since I dont use infantry, for my opinion Sakurako > Victoria, the only good thing in victoria are navy stars and assault art.And I need navy gen after the loss of Kate. Victoria will change your mind about infantry. She can work almost as well as Cavalry. LET'S SAVE AND LOAD!!!(EVIL LAUGHTER) |
|
|
|
Post by Black Heart on Mar 9, 2016 2:01:36 GMT
Yah, since my favorite is assault art, I love playing battle of three emperors and the whole europe are crying... And one time Lan a.art triggered 3x in single turn. And victoria, shes amazing than Suvorov (i try him in battle of trebbia). I havent train her but she have +12 inf.attact. Just awesome generals. Im not bored even i finish all campaign.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Mar 9, 2016 3:18:59 GMT
Victoria will change your mind about infantry. She can work almost as well as Cavalry. LET'S SAVE AND LOAD!!!(EVIL LAUGHTER) Did you ever hear (or experience) an instance were both Assault Art and Cavalry Art triggered on two different generals battling? |
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Mar 9, 2016 3:32:52 GMT
LET'S SAVE AND LOAD!!!(EVIL LAUGHTER) Did you ever hear (or experience) an instance were both Assault Art and Cavalry Art triggered on two different generals battling? If you mean Defense Art, yes. Jean Lannes triggered Assault Art on my Victoria while Victoria triggered Defense Art. Damage -1 to Victoria |
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Mar 9, 2016 4:33:07 GMT
Did you ever hear (or experience) an instance were both Assault Art and Cavalry Art triggered on two different generals battling? If you mean Defense Art, yes. Jean Lannes triggered Assault Art on my Victoria while Victoria triggered Defense Art. Damage -1 to Victoria That doesn't make really sense imo. If both triggers then it should be as if neither trigged canceling each other out. And yes I meant defense art. Idk where I got cavalry art from |
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Mar 9, 2016 4:53:52 GMT
If you mean Defense Art, yes. Jean Lannes triggered Assault Art on my Victoria while Victoria triggered Defense Art. Damage -1 to Victoria That doesn't make really sense imo. If both triggers then it should be as if neither trigged canceling each other out. And yes I meant defense art. Idk where I got cavalry art from A: Easytech tends to do stupid things (Putting you in spain 1809 when in reality you served and died in Austria) B: Autocorrect. (The inventor of Autocorrect has passed away. His funfair is next Monkey) |
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Mar 9, 2016 5:11:51 GMT
That doesn't make really sense imo. If both triggers then it should be as if neither trigged canceling each other out. And yes I meant defense art. Idk where I got cavalry art from A: Easytech tends to do stupid things (Putting you in spain 1809 when in reality you served and died in Austria) B: Autocorrect. (The inventor of Autocorrect has passed away. His funfair is next Monkey) I turned autocorrect off. I think it's because I just read like 200 pages on Murat and some on Lasalle and of course Bessières. Another example is when they use Marmont after he betrayed Napoleon. Another example is when you can recruit Washington in 1812 |
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Mar 9, 2016 5:17:28 GMT
A: Easytech tends to do stupid things (Putting you in spain 1809 when in reality you served and died in Austria) B: Autocorrect. (The inventor of Autocorrect has passed away. His funfair is next Monkey) I turned autocorrect off. I think it's because I just read like 200 pages on Murat and some on Lasalle and of course Bessières. Another example is when they use Marmont after he betrayed Napoleon. Another example is when you can recruit Washington in 1812 The recruiting thing is always off, making people that were kids available in 1775, and making dead people available in 1815/1812/1809 Also: Massena did not declare loyalty for either side during the Hundred Days, yet he was included in the conquest as a provided Gen for France |
|
|
|
Post by Joachim Murat on Apr 23, 2016 16:18:22 GMT
I just wanna ask to u guys, WHY MERCER? Why not just put Paget or Cotton on armored car? Damn easytech really fool. Its even better if that armored car is empty. Aargh
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Apr 23, 2016 16:34:54 GMT
I just wanna ask to u guys, WHY MERCER? Why not just put Paget or Cotton on armored car? Damn easytech really fool. Its even better if that armored car is empty. Aargh The whole point is that this level is hard as heck. They made it harder in any way they could. |
|
|
|
Post by Joachim Murat on Apr 23, 2016 16:46:01 GMT
The whole point is that this level is hard as heck. They made it harder in any way they could.[/quote] Yea they really did! I just made a couple move both side, then suddenly Drouout came and "focused enough" to kill sophia (i put her on heavy arty next to wellington) And after several turn, i recruit guards cav for golitsyn then i split my armies to the blinking cities. Murat succseseded to get Bourdeaux while Wellington died next to "?" golitsyn. Mercer also died by Soult. I just like WTF is happening here... All morale dropp...GGWP |
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Apr 24, 2016 3:57:16 GMT
I just wanna ask to u guys, WHY MERCER? Why not just put Paget or Cotton on armored car? Damn easytech really fool. Its even better if that armored car is empty. Aargh Be happy you're not Poland 1775. They start with their best artillery general on cavalry |
|
