|
|
Post by NetherFreek on Jun 10, 2019 9:42:32 GMT
Something I noticed in the trailer was this:  I don't know how common this is, but it seems that at least for some campaigns you can choose which side you want your troops to be at the start. |
|
|
|
Post by Nobunaga Oda on Jun 10, 2019 14:15:03 GMT
Interesting. A return of ET's old campaign style.
In EW3, you get to pick which belligerent you want to be.
In EW4, some campaigns offer the choice of which side to fight for *AHEM* HRE campaign, but they are only a limited few.
Recently, none of the games allowed for this.
I wonder how will his turn out?
|
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Jun 10, 2019 15:25:48 GMT
Interesting. A return of ET's old campaign style. In EW3, you get to pick which belligerent you want to be. In EW4, some campaigns offer the choice of which side to fight for *AHEM* HRE campaign, but they are only a limited few. Recently, none of the games allowed for this. I wonder how will his turn out? As usual, whatever side you choose there will be a great disadvantage  |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 11, 2019 0:29:55 GMT
stoic, true since easytech AI will spawn troops when you are about to capture a city
|
|
|
|
Post by Harry Lillis "Bing" Crosby Jr on Jun 11, 2019 2:36:56 GMT
stoic , true since easytech AI will spawn troops when you are about to capture a city and sneak behind your captured cities to wait till your not noticing  a pain for speed runs |
|
|
|
Post by Saltin on Jun 13, 2019 6:28:47 GMT
Ahh nice catch, I didn't noticed that choice. I like it because it gives the game more depth and extend game play since most players will eventually play both sides.
|
|
a pain for speed runs
