|
|
Post by Colonel James E. Ross on Jun 26, 2019 22:01:56 GMT
I don't know about you guys but the new rome game doesn't look too amazing as it's hyped up to be. It may just be me being too used to the game genre but I'm not that hyped for the new theme either. Let me know what you guys all think about this.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gone on Jun 26, 2019 22:04:39 GMT
WW2 fascinates me more than Ancient Rome, so I’m not hyped for the game. But I will give it a try when it becomes available for download.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gone on Jun 26, 2019 22:08:02 GMT
Oof. It’s paid. I will wait until a third-party App Store allows it to become free.
|
|
|
|
Post by Harry Lillis "Bing" Crosby Jr on Jun 27, 2019 12:17:50 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Józef Poniatowski on Jun 27, 2019 12:53:48 GMT
It has SO MUCH DEPTH
You can name units
The combat looks lovely, but the way damage works is as convoluted as ever
Generals look B A D A S S
Damage numbers are generally higher like in EW5, but with EW4 style general leveling
I think it lives up to the hype, at least for me
|
|
|
|
Post by Seger on Jun 27, 2019 13:36:23 GMT
Just a year or something and ew5 Will be free! Isn't that a good deal  |
|
|
|
Post by silvercreek on Jun 27, 2019 14:03:10 GMT
It has SO MUCH DEPTH You can name units The combat looks lovely, but the way damage works is as convoluted as ever Generals look B A D A S S Damage numbers are generally higher like in EW5, but with EW4 style general leveling I think it lives up to the hype, at least for me You have the game. You tell us,is it free to play?or rather pay to win? Not that I'm adversed against paying,since I already have,with ET,and probably will again. It would be nice to know, if there will be an option to maybe play casually. |
|
|
|
Post by War Master on Jun 27, 2019 14:12:36 GMT
It has SO MUCH DEPTH You can name units The combat looks lovely, but the way damage works is as convoluted as ever Generals look B A D A S S Damage numbers are generally higher like in EW5, but with EW4 style general leveling I think it lives up to the hype, at least for me You have the game. You tell us,is it free to play?or rather pay to win? Not that I'm adversed against paying,since I already have,with ET,and probably will again. It would be nice to know, if there will be an option to maybe play casually.
It's not to pay to win. In each campaign missions, you will be given one "OP-AI" general to use for free. There is no "turn-limits" to get 3 stars. Only Primary Objectives and Secondary objective. By far haven't spend a penny on the game (for the pre-ordered only). Bought Varus and Upgraged my own "Free general". Now rolling through Spartacus uprising.
|
|
|
|
Post by Seger on Jun 27, 2019 14:16:28 GMT
You have the game. You tell us,is it free to play?or rather pay to win? Not that I'm adversed against paying,since I already have,with ET,and probably will again. It would be nice to know, if there will be an option to maybe play casually.
It's not to pay to win. In each campaign missions, you will be given one "OP-AI" general to use for free. There is no "turn-limits" to get 3 stars. Only Primary Objectives and Secondary objective. By far haven't spend a penny on the game (for the pre-ordered only). Bought Varus and Upgraged my own "Free general". Now rolling through Spartacus uprising.
No turn limit that's amazing! |
|
|
|
Not hyped
Jun 27, 2019 14:16:53 GMT
via mobile
Post by andrei on Jun 27, 2019 14:16:53 GMT
Yeah, it is not possible to clarify whether it is pay to win or not. As in pay-to-win games late game content is ridiculously difficult. Start is OK.
I only hope they found a balance. As late game content of EW5 for example was quite difficult it wasn't obligatory to pay.
|
|
|
|
Post by War Master on Jun 27, 2019 14:19:42 GMT
Yeah, it is not possible to clarify whether it is pay to win or not. As in pay-to-win games late game content is ridiculously difficult. Start is OK. I only hope they found a balance. As late game content of EW5 for example was quite difficult it wasn't obligatory to pay. EW6 was deemed to be hard & pay-to-win. Remember the Fifth mission in US Campaign? That is the mission that I knew Easytech was hungry for cash.
|
|
|
|
Post by Seger on Jun 27, 2019 14:24:59 GMT
Yeah, it is not possible to clarify whether it is pay to win or not. As in pay-to-win games late game content is ridiculously difficult. Start is OK. I only hope they found a balance. As late game content of EW5 for example was quite difficult it wasn't obligatory to pay. EW6 was deemed to be hard & pay-to-win. Remember the Fifth mission in US Campaign? That is the mission that I knew Easytech was hungry for cash.
yes and european conqueror, and if somebody bought wellington then he wasted his money and would buy later probably also blucher or napoleon. |
|
|
|
Post by War Master on Jun 27, 2019 14:28:17 GMT
EW6 was deemed to be hard & pay-to-win. Remember the Fifth mission in US Campaign? That is the mission that I knew Easytech was hungry for cash.
yes and european conqueror, and if somebody bought wellington then he wasted his money and would buy later probably also blucher or napoleon. I bought them all tho. Still the Expeditions was hard no matter how hard I grind the game.
|
|
|
|
Not hyped
Jun 27, 2019 14:33:50 GMT
via mobile
Post by andrei on Jun 27, 2019 14:33:50 GMT
EW6 was deemed to be hard & pay-to-win. Remember the Fifth mission in US Campaign? That is the mission that I knew Easytech was hungry for cash.
yes and european conqueror, and if somebody bought wellington then he wasted his money and would buy later probably also blucher or napoleon. It's general rule: 1st gen is almost useless as You can hire same power gen in the academy, 2nd gen is solid, 3rd gen is great. It was valid for WC series and for EW5. And to justify ET - Wellington has very high battle ability  |
|
|
|
Not hyped
Jun 27, 2019 14:44:21 GMT
via mobile
Post by stoic on Jun 27, 2019 14:44:21 GMT
It's general rule: 1st gen is almost useless as You can hire same power gen in the academy, 2nd gen is solid, 3rd gen is great. It was valid for WC series and for EW5. And to justify ET - Wellington has very high battle ability But now we have a reverse situation (at least, it seems so). All IAP generals are better than the rest (again, at least, it seems so). And this decision to give auras almost exclusively to them is debatable. |
|
Ill just see if anything of interest comes up
