|
Post by kingbutawl on Jul 23, 2019 7:33:55 GMT
Scipio and Pacorus are not that bad like combo . Africanus in my opinion is the best choice at the beginning (and I have had Arminius) for survivability and critic output. Scipio deals a lot of damage and he deserves no less than 4.9 stars!
|
|
|
Post by yuanzhong on Jul 23, 2019 8:23:54 GMT
It was through Hannibal that Scipio became a great strategist. That's how rivalries improve you as a person. Still, Scipio is built for sieges against cities rather than open combat. He will benefit more from having armor items rather than attack items(since if he's in a light cavalry, he'll die quickly). I don't like raid, and having siege or March would have been a better skill overall. Similar to Crassus, although Crassus is better IG, but Scipio IRL . In each easytech game, there were always generals who were better at fighting against you than for you. For example, Rommel, Zhukov, Model, Scipio, Monty... Makes for interesting mission design And you will see Huo in future update His raid and counter attack (and also high critical rate when high morale of course) will make him a pain when you face him I hate all guys with Counter attack in this game
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 23, 2019 8:48:54 GMT
In each easytech game, there were always generals who were better at fighting against you than for you. For example, Rommel, Zhukov, Model, Scipio, Monty... Makes for interesting mission design And you will see Huo in future update His raid and counter attack (and also high critical rate when high morale of course) will make him a pain when you face him I hate all guys with Counter attack in this game Just use archers to deal with them
|
|
|
Scipio
Jul 23, 2019 12:48:34 GMT
via mobile
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Jul 23, 2019 12:48:34 GMT
In each easytech game, there were always generals who were better at fighting against you than for you. For example, Rommel, Zhukov, Model, Scipio, Monty... Makes for interesting mission design And you will see Huo in future update His raid and counter attack (and also high critical rate when high morale of course) will make him a pain when you face him I hate all guys with Counter attack in this game Honestly in any game. Look at the wc4 mods were you fight zhukov and he deals like 900 damage
|
|
|
Post by itzechox on Jul 23, 2019 13:12:30 GMT
I think it will be pretty hard to kill 5 stacked Javelineer Octavian. He has counter attack , besiege and accuracy also 10 percent crit chance. He would be a dangerous boss and i feel like we are going to face him in 3rd mission of new campaign. Also with archcom he can destroy our light armored units in his turn easily
|
|
|
Post by kingbutawl on Jul 23, 2019 13:51:29 GMT
Arminius is strong but critic attack is very important in this game (Scipio's got it and of course the mighty Huo ) . In the end there is no surprise that Scipio deals more damage than Arminius .
|
|
|
Post by andrei on Jul 23, 2019 13:59:59 GMT
Arminius is strong but critic attack is very important in this game (Scipio's got it and of course the mighty Huo ) . In the end there is no surprise that Scipio deals more damage than Arminius . Is it those +10% crit rate what makes Huo "mighty"?
|
|
|
Post by itzechox on Jul 23, 2019 14:02:33 GMT
Arminius is strong but critic attack is very important in this game (Scipio's got it and of course the mighty Huo ) . In the end there is no surprise that Scipio deals more damage than Arminius . Is it those +10% crit rate what makes Huo "mighty"? Wouldnt call him mighty but if we are going for perfect damage %10 makes difference. I wouldnt buy him though i prefer stability which commius does pretty good
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Jul 23, 2019 14:15:41 GMT
I prefer Scipio's consistency over Huo's potential damage nourished with Orations. With a crossbow Scipio has 25% critical rate, and it is not dependent on his moral status. Thus, I save my Orations for Mithridates, who really can be a mass destruction weapon when his moral is high. And with AC lvl 5, Mithridates can deal huge amount of damage.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 23, 2019 14:39:16 GMT
I think it will be pretty hard to kill 5 stacked Javelineer Octavian. He has counter attack , besiege and accuracy also 10 percent crit chance. He would be a dangerous boss and i feel like we are going to face him in 3rd mission of new campaign. Also with archcom he can destroy our light armored units in his turn easily If he can't be baited out from a city, then the usual "capture surrounding cities then spam swordsman to chip his health away until your generals can finish him off"will deal with him just fine. Archers are quite squishy, unless easytech decides to give them armor or hp items. Hopefully hp items, so we at least burn and plague will deal more damage to him.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 23, 2019 14:41:21 GMT
I prefer Scipio's consistency over Huo's potential damage nourished with Orations. With a crossbow Scipio has 25% critical rate, and it is not dependent on his moral status. Thus, I save my Orations for Mithridates, who really can be a mass destruction weapon when his moral is high. And with AC lvl 5, Mithridates can deal huge amount of damage. If I had more medals, I may get this guy in the future. Interesting playstyle which focuses more on dealing with city defenders is always a welcome one. Combined with Crassus, they can capture a lot just by themselves.
|
|
|
Scipio
Jul 23, 2019 14:58:12 GMT
via mobile
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Jul 23, 2019 14:58:12 GMT
I prefer Scipio's consistency over Huo's potential damage nourished with Orations. With a crossbow Scipio has 25% critical rate, and it is not dependent on his moral status. Thus, I save my Orations for Mithridates, who really can be a mass destruction weapon when his moral is high. And with AC lvl 5, Mithridates can deal huge amount of damage. Oh orations like the war tactics. Oh I always forget to use those
|
|
|
Scipio
Jul 23, 2019 15:01:28 GMT
via mobile
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Jul 23, 2019 15:01:28 GMT
Arminius is strong but critic attack is very important in this game (Scipio's got it and of course the mighty Huo ) . In the end there is no surprise that Scipio deals more damage than Arminius . I think Arminius is better because guerilla + -8% counterattack + terrain bonus + assualt. Arminius will always take 8% less damage than scipio in any situation. If you give him a gold ring, he’ll have a 20% chance to crit vs Scipio’s 10. Furthermore since he has guerilla, he will often take no damage at all in combat. Lastly, his terrain bonus is superior to Scipio. 10% crit chance is a good trait to have imo, but there are many better ones in the game
|
|
|
Scipio
Jul 23, 2019 15:05:43 GMT
via mobile
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Jul 23, 2019 15:05:43 GMT
Huo is probably the ideal general in the game to give the laurel crown to. Either him or Mihradates VI. But if you choose to give the crown to Mihradates, I would probably pass up on Huo for Arminius, Anthony, and Scipio. Guerilla and Assualt alone are not enough to save huo, especially since both are percentage skills.
|
|
|
Scipio
Jul 23, 2019 15:06:57 GMT
via mobile
Post by yuanzhong on Jul 23, 2019 15:06:57 GMT
Arminius is strong but critic attack is very important in this game (Scipio's got it and of course the mighty Huo ) . In the end there is no surprise that Scipio deals more damage than Arminius . Is it those +10% crit rate what makes Huo "mighty"? Huo's talent alone doesn't make him "mighty" but his talent + assault + crossbow and high morale make him "mighty". 45% is same rate as leader skill in WC4. And in GCR, there're no many gens with crit talent goes with crit rate skill. 20% or 25% aren't great number but 45% is different.
|
|