|
|
Post by Seger on Jun 29, 2019 16:17:09 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Jul 3, 2019 4:42:20 GMT
It seems that everyone is ignoring this guy, but taking into account what Ralyks said in another thread, namely that high moral "raises raw damage output by almost 20%" - his talent can be one of the best in the game. Simply because we know from previous games that percent is better than mere points some skills can give (for example, Plain fighting etc.). His skills are not bad at all, so I definitely keep an eye on him... |
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Jul 3, 2019 4:57:47 GMT
"Advantage" has an excellent synergy with his talent, btw...
Really he can be a very powerful archer. A very interesting candidate!
|
|
|
|
Post by Seger on Jul 3, 2019 5:29:28 GMT
"Advantage" has an excellent synergy with his talent, btw... Really he can be a very powerful archer. A very interesting candidate! Only hide is a trash skill for archery because you don't want to fight other archers. Like I Said in general Path archery doesn't have a good third gen |
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Jul 3, 2019 6:06:14 GMT
"Advantage" has an excellent synergy with his talent, btw... Really he can be a very powerful archer. A very interesting candidate! Only hide is a trash skill for archery because you don't want to fight other archers. Like I Said in general Path archery doesn't have a good third gen As I understand "hide" is working in attack as well as in defence. And our generals certainly will be attacked by some archers anyway. Besides, he is very good against archers while defending a city... His damage ca be very high meantime. Finally, it is not a bad idea at all to have an archer killer who can win archers' duels when needed (for example, protecting our cavalry generals). |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 3, 2019 9:24:38 GMT
stoic, do you have the game? Also, agreed this guy is strong. Hide isn't that bad, and can be useful when defending. A archer general everyone should consider  .
|
|
|
|
Post by Seger on Jul 3, 2019 9:30:24 GMT
For archery I'm going with mithridates, Octavian, cleo and the commander So unfortunately he is going to make it
|
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Jul 3, 2019 10:55:18 GMT
stoic, do you have the game? Also, agreed this guy is strong. Hide isn't that bad, and can be useful when defending. A archer general everyone should consider . My thought was to complete the game without spending a cent, as usual. But it seems I have to buy the game, because an official CN version is not free anymore... So, probably, we will meet each other on GP leader board |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Jul 3, 2019 11:02:20 GMT
But he lacks archer commander...
No he is good. But octavian cleopatra and mih iv are all much better than him, while not being that much more expensive.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 3, 2019 11:16:18 GMT
stoic , do you have the game? Also, agreed this guy is strong. Hide isn't that bad, and can be useful when defending. A archer general everyone should consider . My thought was to complete the game without spending a cent, as usual. But it seems I have to buy the game, because an official CN version is not free anymore... So, probably, we will meet each other on GP leader board I failed the not spending a cent, since i couldn't grind medals, and all i can do was to play conquest after i hit a wall . Although, the cheaps gens do the job just fine |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Jul 3, 2019 13:39:49 GMT
My thought was to complete the game without spending a cent, as usual. But it seems I have to buy the game, because an official CN version is not free anymore... So, probably, we will meet each other on GP leader board I failed the not spending a cent, since i couldn't grind medals, and all i can do was to play conquest after i hit a wall . Although, the cheaps gens do the job just fine I am still stuck in conquest. Any recommendations for easy nations to play as? |
|
|
|
Post by Seger on Jul 3, 2019 14:24:38 GMT
I failed the not spending a cent, since i couldn't grind medals, and all i can do was to play conquest after i hit a wall . Although, the cheaps gens do the job just fine I am still stuck in conquest. Any recommendations for easy nations to play as? in punic or caesar |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Jul 3, 2019 14:51:32 GMT
I am still stuck in conquest. Any recommendations for easy nations to play as? in punic or caesar Both. I just did macedonia in punic. And also, what exactly do you need to get a rate of 3 in conquest |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 3, 2019 16:49:10 GMT
I failed the not spending a cent, since i couldn't grind medals, and all i can do was to play conquest after i hit a wall . Although, the cheaps gens do the job just fine I am still stuck in conquest. Any recommendations for easy nations to play as? For punic wars, play any nation near Carthage, or Carthage itself. Rome is also playable, but you need to take initiative asap. As for the Caesar one, I only played the Rome Pompey and the event one, but based on experience, play on the Rome side. For Punic wars, it's less stress since all you have to do is support Carthage(or Rome). Whoever has the numbers advantage wins. For the Caesar one, It's the same, although it's much easier for the Rome side to snowball. As for how to get 3 star, I think it's the speed and number of cities captured. The conquest is harder than Ew6, since you can't let your general just wander off alone because the game lacks healing items(you can have 2 turn stops to replenish your bubble) . It's more unit based, and larger nations are easier to play than smaller ones(as opposed to Ew6 where you can bribe your way to victory). |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Jul 3, 2019 17:16:50 GMT
I am still stuck in conquest. Any recommendations for easy nations to play as? For punic wars, play any nation near Carthage, or Carthage itself. Rome is also playable, but you need to take initiative asap. As for the Caesar one, I only played the Rome Pompey and the event one, but based on experience, play on the Rome side. For Punic wars, it's less stress since all you have to do is support Carthage(or Rome). Whoever has the numbers advantage wins. For the Caesar one, It's the same, although it's much easier for the Rome side to snowball. As for how to get 3 star, I think it's the speed and number of cities captured. The conquest is harder than Ew6, since you can't let your general just wander off alone because the game lacks healing items(you can have 2 turn stops to replenish your bubble) . It's more unit based, and larger nations are easier to play than smaller ones(as opposed to Ew6 where you can bribe your way to victory). Thanks. Actually I just beat caesar time as pontus. Yeah your right that strategy works. I bribed morocco in the end and they helped out greatly against spain and portugal, and even in africa. Plus they are so cheap to get on your side. |
|
.
