|
|
Post by Seger on Jun 29, 2019 18:46:44 GMT
 good First gen with her, arminius and Vercingetorix, you have a good basis for your team |
|
|
|
Post by Jeanne d'Arc on Jul 4, 2019 4:03:56 GMT
Might be the best navy commander in the game, and a top navy/archer hybrid.
|
|
|
|
Cleopatra
Jul 4, 2019 12:33:39 GMT
via mobile
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Jul 4, 2019 12:33:39 GMT
The only archers better than her also cost > 200 medals than her.
|
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Jul 4, 2019 12:45:32 GMT
The only archers better than her also cost > 200 medals than her. The rank does the trick, though. Octavian and Co. are two ranks higher and that is more than 200 medals... |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Jul 4, 2019 12:48:26 GMT
The only archers better than her also cost > 200 medals than her. The rank does the trick, though. Octavian and Co. are two ranks higher and that is more than 200 medals... Marshal to consul on one general costs more than buying scipio |
|
|
|
Post by andrei on Jul 4, 2019 12:50:43 GMT
The only archers better than her also cost > 200 medals than her. The rank does the trick, though. Octavian and Co. are two ranks higher and that is more than 200 medals... I don't think that we need to hire her as a field general and to compare to Octavian and other archers. In fact I don't think navy gens (with navy talents) can be called hybrids. As soon as we have no specific navy units, we need to assign navy gen to one of the field, but to use in the sea only, as in that case they will benefit from both abilities. They could be really really powerful. The only question is how often shall we need to fight in the Sea, besides attacking the cities on the shore. |
|
|
|
Cleopatra
Jul 4, 2019 15:04:59 GMT
via mobile
Post by stoic on Jul 4, 2019 15:04:59 GMT
The rank does the trick, though. Octavian and Co. are two ranks higher and that is more than 200 medals... I don't think that we need to hire her as a field general and to compare to Octavian and other archers. In fact I don't think navy gens (with navy talents) can be called hybrids. As soon as we have no specific navy units, we need to assign navy gen to one of the field, but to use in the sea only, as in that case they will benefit from both abilities. They could be really really powerful. The only question is how often shall we need to fight in the Sea, besides attacking the cities on the shore. Isn't a land unit in the Sea counted as a naval unit, without any land bonuses? |
|
|
|
Post by andrei on Jul 4, 2019 15:12:19 GMT
I don't think that we need to hire her as a field general and to compare to Octavian and other archers. In fact I don't think navy gens (with navy talents) can be called hybrids. As soon as we have no specific navy units, we need to assign navy gen to one of the field, but to use in the sea only, as in that case they will benefit from both abilities. They could be really really powerful. The only question is how often shall we need to fight in the Sea, besides attacking the cities on the shore. Isn't a land unit in the Sea counted as a naval unit, without any land bonuses? I mean in water You benefit from Your points in navy AND in archery for example. |
|
ema
Staff Sergeant
Posts: 8
|
Post by ema on Jul 4, 2019 15:52:17 GMT
She is useful for daily missions too, often are requested navy abilities
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 4, 2019 16:14:17 GMT
She is useful for daily missions too, often are requested navy abilities Yeah, agreed. Missed some missions because i lacked navy skills. |
|
|
|
Post by Jeanne d'Arc on Jul 4, 2019 16:17:02 GMT
I am getting the game once it is free, so I have time to chart up options for my first general, and I struck a gold mine immediately with this one.
|
|
|
|
Post by Reinhard Von Lohengramm on Jul 13, 2019 19:51:28 GMT
She is very good ,and compared to octavian (archer general) the difference is small, apart cleopatra is more cheap and the best navy general in the game, she is usefull in conquest and i expect she would be useful in future campaigns and expeditions.
|
|
|
|
Cleopatra
Jul 15, 2019 5:49:00 GMT
via mobile
Post by Józef Poniatowski on Jul 15, 2019 5:49:00 GMT
She is very good ,and compared to octavian (archer general) the difference is small, apart cleopatra is more cheap and the best navy general in the game, she is usefull in conquest and i expect she would be useful in future campaigns and expeditions. I have to agree, she really shines in expeditions as she is truly the best navy hybrid, and when it decides to throw you a navy battle (or more precisely, you decide to fight a navy battle) she can single-handedly carry the battle for your team, and can be a decent archer general as well |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Jul 15, 2019 12:28:25 GMT
I think that Marshal is the best rank. Basically the difference between marshal and consul is that it will cost one turn less to put your general in a tier 5 unit. But the difference from general to marshal is one turn more on the 4th unit, which is quite inconvenient. 380 medals is reasonable, 575 isn’t.
|
|
|
|
Post by andrei on Jul 15, 2019 12:41:33 GMT
I think that Marshal is the best rank. Basically the difference between marshal and consul is that it will cost one turn less to put your general in a tier 5 unit. But the difference from general to marshal is one turn more on the 4th unit, which is quite inconvenient. 380 medals is reasonable, 575 isn’t. Actually there is also 5% attack difference. |
|
