|
|
Post by Ralyks on Jul 4, 2019 20:25:48 GMT
Well, I gave it a go at leveling up building in the senate, but I was surprised at how much gold this soaks up lmao.
So lets take Barracks for example. You have to pay to level it up, leveling it up unlocks an upgrade for all your infantry forever. However, its not like tier 1 Barrack will allow you to upgrade to level 1 for all, but just a single one, leveling up again the barracks will grant another single upgrade, and you pay for the barrack upgrade AND the skill upgrade, and both's prices rank up quite fast... hence the title on this post, hoping to gather some feedback for making the right choices as gold is very slowly gathered now.
Damage seems the best deal, followed by armor (scales better I think), but don't forget at least one point in mobility.
And it sucks that archers gain only 4 damage while the other two get 5 per level. For sure attack on archers was the most valuable stat.
|
|
|
|
Post by Seger on Jul 4, 2019 22:01:34 GMT
Well, I gave it a go at leveling up building in the senate, but I was surprised at how much gold this soaks up lmao. So lets take Barracks for example. You have to pay to level it up, leveling it up unlocks an upgrade for all your infantry forever. However, its not like tier 1 Barrack will allow you to upgrade to level 1 for all, but just a single one, leveling up again the barracks will grant another single upgrade, and you pay for the barrack upgrade AND the skill upgrade, and both's prices rank up quite fast... hence the title on this post, hoping to gather some feedback for making the right choices as gold is very slowly gathered now. Damage seems the best deal, followed by armor (scales better I think), but don't forget at least one point in mobility. And it sucks that archers gain only 4 damage while the other two get 5 per level. For sure attack on archers was the most valuable stat. We only have 5 upgrades per type so i think mobility is the most important thing |
|
|
|
Post by Ralyks on Jul 4, 2019 22:40:02 GMT
We only have 5 upgrades per type so i think mobility is the most important thing Really? But when fighting campaigns, conquests and so, the more you progress the less competitive your troops will be against the ones of the IA Having +25 damage on every single infantry troop (or 20 and 1 mobility) is huge, same for having 10 extra armor. I didn't know maximum is 5, maybe it'll be increased on next patch, but thanks for letting me know  |
|
|
|
Post by xerexes on Jul 4, 2019 23:13:37 GMT
5 for barracks 4 for the rest
|
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Jul 5, 2019 2:14:54 GMT
I already did one mistake by increasing HPs of Infantry by 8 points Hopefully it will be the last one. I think we have to plan our upgrades keeping the roles of each unit type in our team in mind. |
|
|
|
Post by Seger on Jul 5, 2019 4:30:50 GMT
If we take a look at Roles inf should have hp archery damage and Cav speed
|
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Jul 5, 2019 4:34:33 GMT
If we take a look at Roles inf should have hp archery damage and Cav speed I would rather increase Infantry's defence. 8 HPs are not as good as 2 defensive points... |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 5, 2019 5:09:16 GMT
i upgraded cavalry and infantry's mobility. Made a mistake on upgrading cavalry hp. Attack and mobility should be prioritized. Defense is also good. Hp is just a waste, unless someone does the math and proves me wrong  . |
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Jul 5, 2019 5:47:30 GMT
i upgraded cavalry and infantry's mobility. Made a mistake on upgrading cavalry hp. Attack and mobility should be prioritized. Defense is also good. Hp is just a waste, unless someone does the math and proves me wrong . We've made the same mistake because HPs are simply the first option and no-one bothered to inform us that we have to be selective |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 5, 2019 5:50:59 GMT
i upgraded cavalry and infantry's mobility. Made a mistake on upgrading cavalry hp. Attack and mobility should be prioritized. Defense is also good. Hp is just a waste, unless someone does the math and proves me wrong . We've made the same mistake because HPs are simply the first option and no-one bothered to inform us that we have to be selective I thought all stats would be upgraded, so i just pressed and forgot about it |
|
|
|
Post by andrei on Jul 5, 2019 5:59:36 GMT
Yes, my infantry now faster than cavalry. As I didn't prioritised cav mobility.
Ridiculous. Hope they will add possibility to switch upgraded or increase quantity of level for the buildings.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 5, 2019 6:01:51 GMT
Yes, my infantry now faster than cavalry. As I didn't prioritised cav mobility. Ridiculous. Hope they will add possibility to switch upgraded or increase quantity of level for the buildings. They probably will |
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Jul 5, 2019 6:03:06 GMT
Yes, my infantry now faster than cavalry. As I didn't prioritised cav mobility. Ridiculous. Hope they will add possibility to switch upgraded or increase quantity of level for the buildings. I hope they won't |
|
|
|
Post by andrei on Jul 5, 2019 6:28:49 GMT
Yes, my infantry now faster than cavalry. As I didn't prioritised cav mobility. Ridiculous. Hope they will add possibility to switch upgraded or increase quantity of level for the buildings. I hope they won't Why? |
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Jul 5, 2019 6:38:35 GMT
I hope they won't Why? You've made this mistake, I haven't |
|
.
