|
|
Post by dagonithtr on Jul 6, 2019 12:19:22 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Jul 6, 2019 12:20:12 GMT
Yeah crassus is really good at cracking cities. With march well he’ll crack a lot of them really quickly. Could be a great speedrunner. Furthermore siege and tunnel actually stack as they use the same flag.
Thats + 63 damage against cities. Is that worth it? Not really. Want a city cracker, get commius who can actually kill the units inside. This is end game so the cost will be the same. Sure he’ll lose the tunnel skill on crassus, but he’ll be always at max morale and have guerilla.
|
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Jul 6, 2019 12:23:08 GMT
I agree. Infantry is super slow. But you could build a team with vercing, pompey, and bato and just give ver a movement item to keep up. Archers in my opinion aren’t that strong. Seeing as how easy it is to wreck Mih IV in the Mih Campaign missions |
|
|
|
Post by dagonithtr on Jul 6, 2019 12:27:27 GMT
i dont understand why people want lots of generals. im at 7th stage in campaign. you can use 5 generals. in conquests its 8. still you cant use all of them. there is moment of break like 25-35 turns. your conquest go through to 100s turns or just wait to AIs movement to finish your enemy. after some time there isnt manpower problem. you dont have to recruit and cant.
|
|
|
|
Post by andrei on Jul 6, 2019 12:55:20 GMT
dagonithtr, how long are You playing ET games? You still didn't name Your team BTW. And topic is created not in order to convince You or anyone else that my way is the best, but to share. You may think You are always right, no problem, it is not what I would like to discuss  Why do we need many gens? It is fun. We like ET games for these gens and difficult missions. Which are still not delivered BTW. We'll probably get back to the discussion what is better later. Personally I completed all previous ET games in WC and EW series. So I don't think You need to convince me in anything 
|
|
|
|
Post by dagonithtr on Jul 6, 2019 12:57:14 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 6, 2019 15:10:21 GMT
I agree. Infantry is super slow. But you could build a team with vercing, pompey, and bato and just give ver a movement item to keep up. Archers in my opinion aren’t that strong. Seeing as how easy it is to wreck Mih IV in the Mih Campaign missions You gotta have to agree that Mih IV deals a lot of damage. Although Hannibal is just a cheat, if he procs his guerilla and cavalry commander, he can 100-0 any unit, especially if he has high morale. |
|
|
|
Post by andrei on Jul 6, 2019 15:16:50 GMT
I agree. Infantry is super slow. But you could build a team with vercing, pompey, and bato and just give ver a movement item to keep up. Archers in my opinion aren’t that strong. Seeing as how easy it is to wreck Mih IV in the Mih Campaign missions You gotta have to agree that Mih IV deals a lot of damage. Although Hannibal is just a cheat, if he procs his guerilla and cavalry commander, he can 100-0 any unit, especially if he has high morale. Another attack skill is generally super strong. I had my Ceaser attacked 4 times in a raw in one mission. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 6, 2019 15:33:38 GMT
You gotta have to agree that Mih IV deals a lot of damage. Although Hannibal is just a cheat, if he procs his guerilla and cavalry commander, he can 100-0 any unit, especially if he has high morale. Another attack skill is generally super strong. I had my Ceaser attacked 4 times in a raw in one mission. I see the gods blessed you . The most attack i had was 4, and it was hannibal, so no surprise. Never had my Spartacus attack more than twice tho. |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Jul 6, 2019 16:50:44 GMT
Another attack skill is generally super strong. I had my Ceaser attacked 4 times in a raw in one mission. I see the gods blessed you . The most attack i had was 4, and it was hannibal, so no surprise. Never had my Spartacus attack more than twice tho. Me too. Caesar I saw three times. In spartacus’ case, it is forgiveable, as he is infantry. Yeah in conquest, I had the given hannibal essentially one shot scipio without taking much retaliation at all. |
|
|
|
Post by dsongop on Jul 6, 2019 16:56:19 GMT
Man, the IAPs are just crazy good, perhaps too good. There is no Murat/Karl/Guderian in GCR. None of the free generals (excluding commander) are even close to the IAPs. I have Hannibal, Caesar, Vercingetorix, Cleopatra, and Arminius, and my Commander is Infantry based. I've now played many missions and conquests where I only used Caesar and Hannibal. Ultimately, I would get Antony, Mith IV, and Pompey at least. Antony is super mobile, and for a speed-runner like me, he has to be recruited to my team. (Sadly I had a slow start to the game) Mith is obviously the best non IAP archer, and Pompey just seems like a solid infantry based hybrid. From what I see, Spartacus doesn't seem to be as amazing as Hannibal or Caesar, so I'm still debating if I should buy him or not.
|
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Jul 6, 2019 17:09:07 GMT
Man, the IAPs are just crazy good, perhaps too good. There is no Murat/Karl/Guderian in GCR. None of the free generals (excluding commander) are even close to the IAPs. I have Hannibal, Caesar, Vercingetorix, Cleopatra, and Arminius, and my Commander is Infantry based. I've now played many missions and conquests where I only used Caesar and Hannibal. Ultimately, I would get Antony, Mith IV, and Pompey at least. Antony is super mobile, and for a speed-runner like me, he has to be recruited to my team. (Sadly I had a slow start to the game) Mith is obviously the best non IAP archer, and Pompey just seems like a solid infantry based hybrid. From what I see, Spartacus doesn't seem to be as amazing as Hannibal or Caesar, so I'm still debating if I should buy him or not. I have him. He is pretty good. None of his skills are bad or lacking. The problem is with infantry not him. If you need the extra aura on infantry, someone who is a good meatshield, by all means get him, he is good. But if you feel like you are doing just fine, don’t. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 6, 2019 17:13:58 GMT
Man, the IAPs are just crazy good, perhaps too good. There is no Murat/Karl/Guderian in GCR. None of the free generals (excluding commander) are even close to the IAPs. I have Hannibal, Caesar, Vercingetorix, Cleopatra, and Arminius, and my Commander is Infantry based. I've now played many missions and conquests where I only used Caesar and Hannibal. Ultimately, I would get Antony, Mith IV, and Pompey at least. Antony is super mobile, and for a speed-runner like me, he has to be recruited to my team. (Sadly I had a slow start to the game) Mith is obviously the best non IAP archer, and Pompey just seems like a solid infantry based hybrid. From what I see, Spartacus doesn't seem to be as amazing as Hannibal or Caesar, so I'm still debating if I should buy him or not. I think that the infantry gens aren't that far off, and some arguments can be made that Vercingetorix is better than Spartacus. For cavalry tho, Hannibal is just a monster. Antony can match him not in power but mobility, while those generals that try to compete with him in power is not gonna reach him. For Archers, Caesar is undeniably the best. Mith is somewhat close to him, just give him a great item and he's good. |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Jul 6, 2019 17:32:46 GMT
Man, the IAPs are just crazy good, perhaps too good. There is no Murat/Karl/Guderian in GCR. None of the free generals (excluding commander) are even close to the IAPs. I have Hannibal, Caesar, Vercingetorix, Cleopatra, and Arminius, and my Commander is Infantry based. I've now played many missions and conquests where I only used Caesar and Hannibal. Ultimately, I would get Antony, Mith IV, and Pompey at least. Antony is super mobile, and for a speed-runner like me, he has to be recruited to my team. (Sadly I had a slow start to the game) Mith is obviously the best non IAP archer, and Pompey just seems like a solid infantry based hybrid. From what I see, Spartacus doesn't seem to be as amazing as Hannibal or Caesar, so I'm still debating if I should buy him or not. I think that the infantry gens aren't that far off, and some arguments can be made that Vercingetorix is better than Spartacus. For cavalry tho, Hannibal is just a monster. Antony can match him not in power but mobility, while those generals that try to compete with him in power is not gonna reach him. For Archers, Caesar is undeniably the best. Mith is somewhat close to him, just give him a great item and he's good. Agreed. For archers, mih iv and octavian are close, but not quite. For cavarly, hannibal by a long shot. Than arminius and anthony are close. Scipio is very good at somethings just doesn’t meet most of our playstyles. For infantry, pompey and ver are actually better than spartacus. But spartacus has an aura buff is what makes spartacus better than either of the two by himself. Unlike the other iaps, the strong general you pair up with will be outperforming spartacus’ output. |
|
|
|
Post by yuanzhong on Jul 8, 2019 4:24:30 GMT
|
|
