|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Aug 11, 2019 14:50:06 GMT
Hey guys, can you rate my end game team because I am a hit confused at what it should look like.
Infantry: Spartacus, Free Commander (pf, inf commander, siege, tunnel), Agrippa (to make use of roar flag)
Cavarly: Hannibal, Anthony, Arminius
Archers: Caesar, Cleopatra (makes use of Commander Flag)
The reason I want agrippa is that he has both roar and sailor, which boosts critical rates for both infantry and archers. I do think he is quite good, only lacking the ability to attack twice on infantry, but I do lose pompey if I get agrippa. But with the right item, I imagine agrippa having a huge crit rate booster.
|
|
|
|
Post by dsongop on Aug 11, 2019 15:26:57 GMT
Hey guys, can you rate my end game team because I am a hit confused at what it should look like. Infantry: Spartacus, Free Commander (pf, inf commander, siege, tunnel), Agrippa (to make use of roar flag) Cavarly: Hannibal, Anthony, Arminius Archers: Caesar, Cleopatra (makes use of Commander Flag) The reason I want agrippa is that he has both roar and sailor, which boosts critical rates for both infantry and archers. I do think he is quite good, only lacking the ability to attack twice on infantry, but I do lose pompey if I get agrippa. But with the right item, I imagine agrippa having a huge crit rate booster. There are a lot of generals suitable for endgame; you're lineup is perfectly viable, but for me I would prefer mobile yet hard-hitting generals like Pompey. If you're definition of endgame is beating every single campaign, future expeditions, and able to finish conquests for every nation, then that lineup would be more than enough. But if you want to compete for records then you should probably use Pompey instead of Agrippa (remember Pompey has inf crit talent). Also Cleopatra isn't the best choice for your 2nd archer gen. Drussus, Octavian, and Mith VI are better. On top of all those generals you mentioned including Pompey, practically all gold generals except for Burebista and Sertorius are useable. Also you should probably buy Surena since he is the best cavalry-archery hybrid in the game. |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Aug 11, 2019 15:48:56 GMT
Hey guys, can you rate my end game team because I am a hit confused at what it should look like. Infantry: Spartacus, Free Commander (pf, inf commander, siege, tunnel), Agrippa (to make use of roar flag) Cavarly: Hannibal, Anthony, Arminius Archers: Caesar, Cleopatra (makes use of Commander Flag) The reason I want agrippa is that he has both roar and sailor, which boosts critical rates for both infantry and archers. I do think he is quite good, only lacking the ability to attack twice on infantry, but I do lose pompey if I get agrippa. But with the right item, I imagine agrippa having a huge crit rate booster. There are a lot of generals suitable for endgame; you're lineup is perfectly viable, but for me I would prefer mobile yet hard-hitting generals like Pompey. If you're definition of endgame is beating every single campaign, future expeditions, and able to finish conquests for every nation, then that lineup would be more than enough. But if you want to compete for records then you should probably use Pompey instead of Agrippa (remember Pompey has inf crit talent). Also Cleopatra isn't the best choice for your 2nd archer gen. Drussus, Octavian, and Mith VI are better. On top of all those generals you mentioned including Pompey, practically all gold generals except for Burebista and Sertorius are useable. Also you should probably buy Surena since he is the best cavalry-archery hybrid in the game. True, Burebista is a good general, always useful when given to use for free, but not one for the team. Better ones like Labienus and Vercingetorix exist. |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Aug 11, 2019 15:57:25 GMT
As for drusus vs mih vi vs cleopatra, that debate I am still going through.
Cleo has a navy aura, being strong in the ocean, and the fact that I have 8 navy commander scrolls going for her. I could get her both archer and navy commander skills to lvl 5 and her being powerful.
Drusus also has a good skill set. I could give him the roar flag and an hp item and he’ll have amazing survivability plus greater average damage than mih or cleo. He lacks archer commander though, but them again only 25% chance to trigger at max
Lastly, we have Mihridates VI. All 4 of his skills work together really well and his talent is overpowered. But he is not as tough as Drusus, while he also does not put my navy commander scrolls to use for cleo. Or should I go for a 3-3-3 lineup?
|
|
|
|
Post by andrei on Aug 11, 2019 16:30:39 GMT
As for drusus vs mih vi vs cleopatra, that debate I am still going through. Cleo has a navy aura, being strong in the ocean, and the fact that I have 8 navy commander scrolls going for her. I could get her both archer and navy commander skills to lvl 5 and her being powerful. Drusus also has a good skill set. I could give him the roar flag and an hp item and he’ll have amazing survivability plus greater average damage than mih or cleo. He lacks archer commander though, but them again only 25% chance to trigger at max Lastly, we have Mihridates VI. All 4 of his skills work together really well and his talent is overpowered. But he is not as tough as Drusus, while he also does not put my navy commander scrolls to use for cleo. Or should I go for a 3-3-3 lineup? There is one question. Why do You need to waste such a great flag for Cleo?  Just because it boosts navy commander as well? But why do You need navy commander? For what purpose?  |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Aug 11, 2019 16:58:29 GMT
As for drusus vs mih vi vs cleopatra, that debate I am still going through. Cleo has a navy aura, being strong in the ocean, and the fact that I have 8 navy commander scrolls going for her. I could get her both archer and navy commander skills to lvl 5 and her being powerful. Drusus also has a good skill set. I could give him the roar flag and an hp item and he’ll have amazing survivability plus greater average damage than mih or cleo. He lacks archer commander though, but them again only 25% chance to trigger at max Lastly, we have Mihridates VI. All 4 of his skills work together really well and his talent is overpowered. But he is not as tough as Drusus, while he also does not put my navy commander scrolls to use for cleo. Or should I go for a 3-3-3 lineup? There is one question. Why do You need to waste such a great flag for Cleo? Just because it boosts navy commander as well? But why do You need navy commander? For what purpose? 1. Exactly, 2 skills being boosted by a single flag is amazing. But they don’t work exactly together. 2. It is well used on an archer general, as they take no retaliation 3. Why do I need navy commander? A good question. Probably will be useful when crossing the ocean with an army, or attacking a city from the ocean. Still, 8 scrolls = 360 uninvested medals. I think purchasing cleo is mandatory for me. But the question is, do I need an additional archer general like mihridates or drusus? |
|
|
|
Post by Reinhard Von Lohengramm on Aug 11, 2019 16:59:24 GMT
In another device i will plan to have this team:
Arminius - Pacorus I
Pompey - Crassus - Labienus
Pedius - Mithridates - Drusus
I dont want to use the Commander because he is so expensive for upgrade and the perfomance is around the same as another more cheap generals like Arminius - Crassus - Octavian. The 15% bonus is good, but to lvl up the skill to lvl4 is a pain, around 1800, when to lvlup the main skills and of arminius is around 600 medals or even more cheap.
The commander is good and looks cool, but i dont want to waste my medals in a expensive general with no much difference in perfomance compared to others, RIP my Commander. With this medals i can upgrade another gen to Marshall and buy the Golden Spear.
A good cheap team is good for me because i dont need to spent much time, because i have other games to complete (Guild of dungeonering, Pokemon White 1&2, Final fantasy VI & V, Castlevania Symphony of the night & Aria of Sorrow) and apart i will enter in the school tomorrow
|
|
|
|
Post by Reinhard Von Lohengramm on Aug 11, 2019 17:02:12 GMT
Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus, You have Caesar and probably the Crown is for Hannibal, Caesar need Oration for max potential, Drusus and Octavian dont need, Drusus is more consistent and a bit more cheap to upgrade, but if you have confidence and luck, Octavian is better
|
|
