|
|
Post by Svetozar Boroević von Bojna on Jan 20, 2020 12:43:56 GMT
MacClellan isn't great irl but he is still somewhat capable as he dealt about 20,000 casualties to Lee in the Seven Days Battles while only suffering about 16,000. While 'Retreat from the Isonzo and open the gates to Austria' Hotzendorf and 'Attack the same river 12 times' Cadorna is laughable when compared with McClellan McClellan was capable and not absolutely trash, but still overrated in this game. Cadorna was a joke just like Hotzendorf, visions of grandeur. Esperey on the other hand, under rated in my opinion d'Esperey, the man who got the Prussia of the east out of the war: worse than Luigi Cadorna the reckless. (I firmly believe that Bulgaria was defeated because they got no Bismarck or Moltke) |
|
|
|
Post by Gone on Apr 29, 2020 0:47:37 GMT
Required for History Mode now.
|
|
|
|
Post by Darth Vader on Apr 29, 2020 0:50:09 GMT
Gone, are you mobile or Apple?
|
|
|
|
Post by Harry Lillis "Bing" Crosby Jr on Apr 29, 2020 1:21:30 GMT
Gone , are you mobile or Apple? He's apple mobile haha |
|
|
|
Post by Darth Vader on Apr 29, 2020 1:34:24 GMT
O, the iPhone!
|
|
|
|
Post by bertholdt838 on May 8, 2020 20:46:00 GMT
I actually disagree, Hotzendorf wasnt a *Auto Corrected*, he was actually a strategy genius.
In my opinion he was the best strategist of ww1, but on the other hand, he was the worst tactician.
He doesnt really know how to lead an army, but he knows how to make plans really well.
Boroevic leading the army+Hotzendorfs strategies = victory at isonzo
|
|
|
|
Post by bertholdt838 on May 8, 2020 20:47:20 GMT
Cadorna was a *Auto Corrected* that deserved to be executed 1/5
|
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on May 8, 2020 21:51:40 GMT
I actually disagree, Hotzendorf wasnt a *Auto Corrected*, he was actually a strategy genius. In my opinion he was the best strategist of ww1, but on the other hand, he was the worst tactician. He doesnt really know how to lead an army, but he knows how to make plans really well. Boroevic leading the army+Hotzendorfs strategies = victory at isonzo Good sunmary. |
|
|
|
Post by SolidLight on May 9, 2020 13:14:03 GMT
I actually disagree, Hotzendorf wasnt a *Auto Corrected*, he was actually a strategy genius. In my opinion he was the best strategist of ww1, but on the other hand, he was the worst tactician. He doesnt really know how to lead an army, but he knows how to make plans really well. Boroevic leading the army+Hotzendorfs strategies = victory at isonzo + Cadornas idiocy. |
|
|
|
Post by SolidLight on May 9, 2020 13:16:41 GMT
Also, Cadorna is kinda an example of why I'm not super fond of the textbook update. I thought everyone having somewhat sub-optimal skillsets (except Ludendorff) was interesting. And Cadorna could have been handy back when he was the only one with Dogfight, but now he's totally useless.
|
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on May 9, 2020 16:41:46 GMT
Also, Cadorna is kinda an example of why I'm not super fond of the textbook update. I thought everyone having somewhat sub-optimal skillsets (except Ludendorff) was interesting. And Cadorna could have been handy back when he was the only one with Dogfight, but now he's totally useless. Now we have maria |
|
|
|
Post by Gone on May 9, 2020 18:01:41 GMT
Also, Cadorna is kinda an example of why I'm not super fond of the textbook update. I thought everyone having somewhat sub-optimal skillsets (except Ludendorff) was interesting. And Cadorna could have been handy back when he was the only one with Dogfight, but now he's totally useless. Can Garibaldi and Aosta really beat the Italian mission? I mean, Garibaldi is not great and he costs medals, but at least he is not terrible like Cadorna and you don’t need to waste textbooks on him or ennoble him to even make him usable. He is basically Infantry Krasnik but with medal cost instead (That’s supposed to be the bummer, but then again, we have a ridiculous amount of general slots and medals pretty much rain into our hands in this game). |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on May 10, 2020 1:51:18 GMT
Why are you guys roasting Cadorna so badly when Plehwe is the worst cavarly general in the game. Give him some heat
|
|
|
|
Post by Gone on May 10, 2020 2:58:03 GMT
Why are you guys roasting Cadorna so badly when Plehwe is the worst cavarly general in the game. Give him some heat Nah. Cadorna is worse. Worse damage. His skillset is even worse than Joffre’s because Joffre has at least two decent skills while Cadorna has only one. |
|
|
|
Post by Harry Lillis "Bing" Crosby Jr on May 10, 2020 3:05:45 GMT
Also, Cadorna is kinda an example of why I'm not super fond of the textbook update. I thought everyone having somewhat sub-optimal skillsets (except Ludendorff) was interesting. And Cadorna could have been handy back when he was the only one with Dogfight, but now he's totally useless. Can Garibaldi and Aosta really beat the Italian mission? I mean, Garibaldi is not great and he costs medals, but at least he is not terrible like Cadorna and you don’t need to waste textbooks on him or ennoble him to even make him usable. He is basically Infantry Krasnik but with medal cost instead (That’s supposed to be the bummer, but then again, we have a ridiculous amount of general slots and medals pretty much rain into our hands in this game). I would imagine Garibaldi + Aosta + Free Cadorna would stand some chance. But many rivers to cross though, meaning that your troops might get worn down very easily. At least there are provided generals too |
|
