|
|
Princess?
Dec 27, 2015 16:33:40 GMT
via mobile
Post by mcdavid burger on Dec 27, 2015 16:33:40 GMT
If the Princess worth getting since I have top general napoleon and others once.
|
|
|
|
Princess?
Dec 27, 2015 16:46:08 GMT
via mobile
Post by NetherFreek on Dec 27, 2015 16:46:08 GMT
its always good to have them, why not would i say?
|
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Dec 27, 2015 16:47:23 GMT
If the Princess worth getting since I have top general napoleon and others once. The artillery princesses are very good and if you don't have a naval general, Kate is the best one. Sophia and Isabela are the artillery generals and both are arguably better than Napoleon. Sophia is gained through a 60 round Europe conquest, Isabela in 45 rounds, Kate in a 50 round America conquest. |
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Dec 28, 2015 4:03:42 GMT
Honestly Napoleon isn't a good general IMO. His stars are Flabbergasting, but his skills are really unfocused. Sophia and Isabella have a lot more going on in the arty department and Sophia can even do Cav well (and inf if you train her, since she's basically Ney with art instead of cav). Top tier has a lot of bull, Napoleon included
|
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Dec 28, 2015 4:47:12 GMT
Honestly Napoleon isn't a good general IMO. His stars are Flabbergasting, but his skills are really unfocused. Sophia and Isabella have a lot more going on in the arty department and Sophia can even do Cav well (and inf if you train her, since she's basically Ney with art instead of cav). Top tier has a lot of bull, Napoleon included Yes Napoleon is too spread out on his skills. |
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Dec 28, 2015 7:43:52 GMT
Honestly Napoleon isn't a good general IMO. His stars are Flabbergasting, but his skills are really unfocused. Sophia and Isabella have a lot more going on in the arty department and Sophia can even do Cav well (and inf if you train her, since she's basically Ney with art instead of cav). Top tier has a lot of bull, Napoleon included Yes Napoleon is too spread out on his skills. BTW multi-role isn't bad, it just needs proper implementation. A good multi-role general either has 2-3 skills in one area (Jourdan), 2-4 Support Skills (Lannes, Poniatowski, Sophia, Ney), or skills concentrated in one area with extra stars in another (Moreau). Napoleon, on the other hand, has one skill in each of 2 areas. 1 support skill, an banner (which isn't worth it because flags are really expensive). |
|
|
|
Post by kanue on Dec 29, 2015 8:38:04 GMT
Multiple role is important if you are not buying extra general slots. So Napoleon can still be good (though I don't know if there's anyone who did not buy any extra slot but buy Napoleon) even though Sakurako is better than him for the role.
|
|
|
|
Princess?
Dec 29, 2015 8:45:36 GMT
via mobile
Post by Jean Lannes on Dec 29, 2015 8:45:36 GMT
Moreau is likely the best general.
You could say Lasalle or Murat too because cavalry is very important but Moreau's story kind of makes sense with the game.
He fought for France, moved to the USA and then came back and fought for the Coalition. That means he fought for all the sides in this game
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Dec 29, 2015 18:23:14 GMT
Multiple role is important if you are not buying extra general slots. So Napoleon can still be good (though I don't know if there's anyone who did not buy any extra slot but buy Napoleon) even though Sakurako is better than him for the role. Perhaps, but there are tons of better hybrids than Napoleon in Tier 3 (Poniatowski, Lannes) and even Tier 2 (Jourdan, Ney) |
|
