|
Post by Deleted on Jan 26, 2020 10:29:04 GMT
Hi guys! I don't know if this has already been posted here. I just wanted to share one thing that I noticed. The skills of given to some generals in wc3 are historically more accurate than the skills given to them in Wc4.For eg:- Model was known to be a defensive general and the skills given to him in Wc3 were useful for defending cities. Whereas in Wc4 he has mountain fighting (I can't understand why). Same goes for Govorov(jungle fighting) and Heinrici(Saw him in some campaign or conquest with skills not related to defending). What's your opinion on this? Thanks!
|
|
|
Post by Harry Lillis "Bing" Crosby Jr on Jan 26, 2020 15:07:32 GMT
Hi guys! I don't know if this has already been posted here. I just wanted to share one thing that I noticed. The skills of given to some generals in wc3 are historically more accurate than the skills given to them in Wc4.For eg:- Model was known to be a defensive general and the skills given to him in Wc3 were useful for defending cities. Whereas in Wc4 he has mountain fighting (I can't understand why). Same goes for Govorov(jungle fighting) and Heinrici(Saw him in some campaign or conquest with skills not related to defending). What's your opinion on this? Thanks! well it also depends on what fronts they were commanding. Maybe North Ukraine had plenty of mountains for Model? Well in the conquests since model tackles the Romanian front naturally there would be some mountains there. As for jungle fighting, it kind of makes sense for artillery to be stationed on plains or jungles in Russia. Overall it also depends on the skills other generals in the similar faction/speciality have.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 26, 2020 15:22:18 GMT
Hi guys! I don't know if this has already been posted here. I just wanted to share one thing that I noticed. The skills of given to some generals in wc3 are historically more accurate than the skills given to them in Wc4.For eg:- Model was known to be a defensive general and the skills given to him in Wc3 were useful for defending cities. Whereas in Wc4 he has mountain fighting (I can't understand why). Same goes for Govorov(jungle fighting) and Heinrici(Saw him in some campaign or conquest with skills not related to defending). What's your opinion on this? Thanks! well it also depends on what fronts they were commanding. Maybe North Ukraine had plenty of mountains for Model? Well in the conquests since model tackles the Romanian front naturally there would be some mountains there. As for jungle fighting, it kind of makes sense for artillery to be stationed on plains or jungles in Russia. Overall it also depends on the skills other generals in the similar faction/speciality have. That's a good point!
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 26, 2020 15:25:51 GMT
I liked Model more with the defensive skills because that allowed him to be used as a defensive general. Idk about the current version.
|
|