|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Dec 30, 2015 18:26:49 GMT
what year does this start in?
|
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Dec 30, 2015 18:34:19 GMT
what year does this start in? 1463. Władysław Anders has reserved the Moors for you |
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Dec 30, 2015 18:52:06 GMT
what year does this start in? 1463. Władysław Anders has reserved the Moors for you That's nice but is Switzerland an option? It got independent in 1271 If not, then I'll take the Moors. Moors control parts of Iberia correct? |
|
|
|
Post by Conrad von Hotzendorf on Dec 30, 2015 19:19:26 GMT
Any thing on Ireland
|
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Dec 30, 2015 19:31:11 GMT
That's nice but is Switzerland an option? It got independent in 1271 If not, then I'll take the Moors. Moors control parts of Iberia correct? Check the map. |
|
|
|
Post by Fedor on Dec 30, 2015 20:00:51 GMT
It me. It begins in the 12th century and ends in 1463 and does not stat in that year. It is me Feodor. Just to prove it, I love maps.
|
|
|
|
Post by General William T. Sherman on Dec 30, 2015 20:11:20 GMT
Just a question Władysław Anders, does taking over certain areas give you the capacity for more military power as the area would give you more population? So, for example, would taking over Paris give you the capacity to build more troops than if you took over Lisbon? |
|
|
|
Post by Vatutin on Dec 30, 2015 20:53:15 GMT
Hello fedor It me. It begins in the 12th century and ends in 1463 and does not stat in that year. It is me Feodor. Just to prove it, I love maps.
|
|
|
|
Post by best75 on Dec 30, 2015 22:00:15 GMT
Okay I will be HRE
|
|
|
|
Post by Von Bismarck jr on Dec 30, 2015 22:17:32 GMT
I don't really think I'm interested in this one at all. We've been making so many theoretical wars WWI and after I don't really see the point in making one back when the Byzantines still existed.
|
|
|
|
Post by Vatutin on Dec 30, 2015 22:22:00 GMT
I don't really think I'm interested in this one at all. We've been making so many theoretical wars WWI and after I don't really see the point in making one back when the Byzantines still existed. For the glory of the Roman Empire |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 30, 2015 22:35:23 GMT
I don't really think I'm interested in this one at all. We've been making so many theoretical wars WWI and after I don't really see the point in making one back when the Byzantines still existed. For the glory of the Roman Empire I think that it would be better if you said: for the glory of the holy Roman empire. |
|
|
|
Post by Philip II of Macedon on Dec 30, 2015 22:46:19 GMT
For the glory of the Roman Empire I think that it would be better if you said: for the glory of the holy Roman empire. The holy Romans thought they were the heirs to the Roman empire though, so its not totally out of the possibility they would say that, no matter what the Byzatines said. |
|
|
|
Post by Vatutin on Dec 30, 2015 23:27:03 GMT
For the glory of the Roman Empire I think that it would be better if you said: for the glory of the holy Roman empire. For the glory of the Old Roman Empire |
|
|
|
Post by Dwight Eisenhower on Dec 31, 2015 2:49:36 GMT
Hmm I've never played these things before. England seems relatively safe with my navy, I'll play that. How do you play? What do you mean by your navy? Are you guys playing this in a game??? |
|
.jpg)
