|
|
Post by Harry Lillis "Bing" Crosby Jr on Mar 23, 2020 9:06:09 GMT
Multiplayer conquests would be fun They could implement this fairly easily online, the only problem would be how to coordinate turns and drop people out when they go afk. The app Uniwar is a good example of how to do online turnbased play. If they do add multiplayer conquest we should start one together as a group. ahaha community forum network |
|
|
|
Post by 𝘛𝘳𝘰𝘵𝘴𝘬𝘺 on Mar 30, 2020 23:40:46 GMT
They could implement this fairly easily online, the only problem would be how to coordinate turns and drop people out when they go afk. The app Uniwar is a good example of how to do online turnbased play. If they do add multiplayer conquest we should start one together as a group. ahaha community forum network The problems with the end of turns in an online multiplayer mode can be easy solved - you agree a max time limit and turns that are not finished will be done by auto. If your line breaks the other players are not loosing an allayed or enemy and you even can login again if you was lost. This design will fit - but --- under construction --- Coming from EW4 this game looks amazingly unfinished - in many aspects. (Android) |
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Apr 1, 2020 7:13:54 GMT
In fact, there are some good ways to handle multilayer problems. One of them is well-known from MTW2 days. These were hotsit conquests. One player creates a conquest and decides how many human players will be in. He makes his turn and then saves the game. Then he simply shares this save file with the player whose turn is next. All that is needed is to upload save files after our turns. All diplomacy and common strategy questions can be discussed between players in private messages or chat groups. As I remember it was very exciting, because playing with humans is far more interesting than with AI. There were many human oriented features like coalition attacks vs. weak chains, treachery, useful donations etc...
|
|
|
|
Post by Józef Poniatowski on Apr 23, 2020 19:15:16 GMT
I would love a system by which you can put a troop on a general and add them in on campaign, like in conquest or in GoG 2 or the challenges in WC4.
Imagine throwing Straubenburg and some air rifle bois in on a British Empire mission, next to Lee on a Gatling Gun. Having their unit keep experience (but gain levels more slowly) makes it hurt more to lose them, making keeping your generals alive more imperative.
It would also be cool to see a unit's uniform get more elaborate the more experienced they are, if that is possible.
Just a few ideas!
|
|
|
|
Post by Darth Vader on Apr 23, 2020 19:23:13 GMT
I would like to see a sandbox mod and would love to see aircraft as a unit and not a tactic.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gone on Apr 24, 2020 23:17:39 GMT
I would like to see a sandbox mod and would love to see aircraft as a unit and not a tactic. Too big of a change. |
|
|
|
Post by Darth Vader on Apr 24, 2020 23:23:55 GMT
Maybe not sandbox but how about were your generals 1v1 each other and see who is better. Like a arena
|
|
|
|
Post by Gone on Apr 24, 2020 23:31:21 GMT
Maybe not sandbox but how about were your generals 1v1 each other and see who is better. Like a arena Risky. That could be implemented, but a few mistakes here and there and the game would become controversial. |
|
|
|
Post by Darth Vader on Apr 24, 2020 23:36:18 GMT
Yeah your right I don't want easytech being sued, I I Wonder if they will make a first person shooting game where your a general and lead a army. It would be fun to first person people and strategic people like me. Then again that is also risky. |
|
|
|
Post by Gone on Apr 25, 2020 0:07:08 GMT
Yeah your right I don't want easytech being sued, I I Wonder if they will make a first person shooting game where your a general and lead a army. It would be fun to first person people and strategic people like me. Then again that is also risky. FPS mobile games are inferior to console games. And personally I believe that ET should remain on the mobile area. They did port EW6:1804 to Switch but that wasn’t very successful from what I’ve heard. |
|
|
|
Post by Darth Vader on Apr 25, 2020 0:11:36 GMT
I am mobile as well,maybe easytech should advertise like many other successful companys or sponsor YouTube channels for easytech content. The problem is idk if easytech has enough money and plus they were suded by China a few weeks ago.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gone on Apr 25, 2020 0:15:13 GMT
I am mobile as well,maybe easytech should advertise like many other successful companys or sponsor YouTube channels for easytech content. The problem is idk if easytech has enough money and plus they were suded by China a few weeks ago. That’s why I dislike the Chinese government. I am fond of the Chinese people, a very unique culture they have. But their reputation is ruined by an authoritarian government that, despite not being exactly communist, is broadly viewed as. I haven’t seen someone define them as a next-gen Soviet Union, but I bet there is somebody around the world that believes they are. |
|
|
|
Post by Darth Vader on Apr 25, 2020 0:24:47 GMT
I like the Chinese as well, I also I like socialism and capitalism. There government is to strict but if the people went capitalist they would lose a lot. So I think China so switch to social democracy where they will have a mix of both.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gone on Apr 25, 2020 2:16:55 GMT
I like the Chinese as well, I also I like socialism and capitalism. There government is to strict but if the people went capitalist they would lose a lot. So I think China so switch to social democracy where they will have a mix of both. I only wish it was easy to create a fair and happy country. I would love to rule a country where the people are happy and peaceful. |
|
|
|
Post by Gone on Apr 25, 2020 2:19:28 GMT
Sadly, following Machiavelli is the better option, since being feared is better than being loved.
|
|
