|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Jan 28, 2016 18:18:34 GMT
And now we have to check Mountbatten and his skills being a GM It has nothing to do with my skills. It has to do with all of you treating each other fairly. yeah, but still a check and balance department is always handy
|
|
|
Post by António Salazar on Jan 28, 2016 19:32:42 GMT
War reopened
1) I try to capture the city where I was born Haarlem. I need a 3 to capture since it biggest army of the world against armed peasants
War closed for good ·lSFUxdrI
|
|
|
Post by António Salazar on Jan 28, 2016 19:33:21 GMT
m3T5EsS7·
|
|
|
Post by António Salazar on Jan 28, 2016 19:34:16 GMT
Sorry guys, had to do this for myself and for my city!
|
|
|
Post by NetherFreek on Jan 28, 2016 20:04:06 GMT
Haarlem, big city in NL, it lies in Holland
|
|
|
Post by Moreau on Jan 28, 2016 21:09:35 GMT
Good job fedor
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Jan 28, 2016 22:02:18 GMT
Haarlem, big city in NL, it lies in Holland You mean Harlem in New York m8
|
|
|
Post by best75 on Jan 28, 2016 22:33:29 GMT
This theotrical war was great, the longest and had intresting new features. The provience system was very good in the war, means small countries can't get bigger armies then large countries, adds value to land and can encourage the players to go to war some time. The tech tree was also good and very intresting with many paths to go down. Just the nature of the war makes this very good, in other wars that were based on historical wars there were events that pull players in the war and the players sort of know what to expect. This war starts with everyone neutral and no events pulled players into war so the player has many choices on what to do.
|
|
|
Post by António Salazar on Jan 29, 2016 5:57:12 GMT
Haarlem, big city in NL, it lies in Holland You mean Harlem in New York m8 Harlem is named after Haarlem.I am still not sure if the city should take that as compliment...
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Jan 29, 2016 9:22:30 GMT
Trying to take back the lost ground from the Byzantines (this is just a try to see whether the Moors were able to occupy Arabia again or not, just some more fiction ) Declare war on Byzantine, Hungary, Khawarizm and Russia Drop EIO member title 1) attack Tripoli, need a five due to no Byzantine army in Africa fGB_Dzkk2) Attack Tunis, need a five 3) the Moors have a slight advantage, though the destination is far, they now attack Benghazi, need a seven , the city is easily taken 4) march to masra Matruh, need a six 5) attacking Cairo, need a seven 6) the final destination of Mecca is in sight and the Muslims all over Africa conscript in the Muslim army to occupy Mecca , a nine is needed to take back the Holy City wooohoo, the city is taken, the caliphate is restored, joy all over the Muslim world, in Khawarizm tensions arise as the Muslims try to overthrow the Russia aligned government 7) attack Riyadh, need a six since the Byzantines are retreating now 8) attack Tabuk, need a five ···············
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Jan 29, 2016 9:36:28 GMT
Hell António Salazar you're empire was actually crumbling, I could've declared war on you but I don't know why I didn't Was an easy win for me but still ....
|
|
|
Post by Władysław Anders on Jan 29, 2016 10:46:55 GMT
lol.
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Jan 29, 2016 11:40:41 GMT
Hell António Salazar you're empire was actually crumbling, I could've declared war on you but I don't know why I didn't Was an easy win for me but still .... You could do that, but then he will attack back and so will I. So that wouldn't have ended well for you. And remember he defeated you before, he just gave you back land.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 29, 2016 11:44:48 GMT
I just could attacked from Poland to Tsardom and in one Phase I could get 2 regions(Theorethically): 1) Major land(6) 1.y8xuWx_| 2. 2)Minor city(7) 1. 2. 3)Minor land(5) 1. 2.
4)Major city(8) 1. 2. ···············
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Jan 29, 2016 11:45:47 GMT
Hell António Salazar you're empire was actually crumbling, I could've declared war on you but I don't know why I didn't Was an easy win for me but still .... You could do that, but then he will attack back and so will I. So that wouldn't have ended well for you. And remember he defeated you before, he just gave you back land. he would be in "morale down situation" with him not be able to counterattack like he should and you already had armies near the Germans
|
|