|
Post by Gone on May 15, 2020 18:45:03 GMT
As History Mode missions are actually intended for farming, and not to be done in order (You can go all the way until the Soviet missions and do them first), don’t force yourself to do missions where you have to use bad generals that nobody in their sane mind would buy to serve as part of the main roster.
Rather, take advantage of the missions that are so easy that you don’t need to use generals at all (Such as the Japanese mission) or those where you can use a significant part of your main roster (Prussian missions, for example, since Moltke, Hindenburg and Beseler are all usable there).
In missions where you have to use mediocre generals, the rewards are terrible compared to the cost of the generals and the medpacks that you are forced to use. So don’t do them at all.
|
|
|
Post by ambitiousace on May 16, 2020 9:35:20 GMT
Tbh some of the missions doesn't deserve the difficulty given the rewards arent too fruitful.Conquest however is more balanced(Not Challenge ofc)
|
|
|
Post by Navia Lanoira on May 17, 2020 14:16:08 GMT
As History Mode missions are actually intended for farming, and not to be done in order (You can go all the way until the Soviet missions and do them first), don’t force yourself to do missions where you have to use bad generals that nobody in their sane mind would buy to serve as part of the main roster. Rather, take advantage of the missions that are so easy that you don’t need to use generals at all (Such as the Japanese mission) or those where you can use a significant part of your main roster (Prussian missions, for example, since Moltke, Hindenburg and Beseler are all usable there). In missions where you have to use mediocre generals, the rewards are terrible compared to the cost of the generals and the medpacks that you are forced to use. So don’t do them at all. Its still in choice tho, but after you got the item for that, its not that worthful to play.
|
|