arman
Staff Sergeant
Posts: 12
|
Post by arman on Jun 10, 2020 5:11:59 GMT
Is commander skills like cavalry commander skill gives more power to the general and his following cavalry.Or,it gives power only to the following cavalr?.
|
|
|
|
Post by Darth Vader on Jun 10, 2020 5:21:49 GMT
Is commander skills like cavalry commander skill gives more power to the general and his following cavalry.Or,it gives power only to the following cavalr? Welcome to the fourm! Also Calvary commander works on your Generals Ally Calvary that are next to them. |
|
|
|
Post by SolidLight on Jun 10, 2020 7:52:42 GMT
Is commander skills like cavalry commander skill gives more power to the general and his following cavalry.Or,it gives power only to the following cavalr?. Both. |
|
arman
Staff Sergeant
Posts: 12
|
Post by arman on Jun 10, 2020 8:30:43 GMT
Is commander skills like cavalry commander skill gives more power to the general and his following cavalry.Or,it gives power only to the following cavalr?. Both. Oh,it means the general itself wouldn’t get the power rather the following units beside the general would get that power? |
|
|
|
Post by SolidLight on Jun 10, 2020 8:37:20 GMT
Oh,it means the general itself wouldn’t get the power rather the following units beside the general would get that power? It gives the damage boost to both the general and nearby allied cavalry units. |
|
|
|
Post by Harry Lillis "Bing" Crosby Jr on Jun 12, 2020 7:46:16 GMT
Oh,it means the general itself wouldn’t get the power rather the following units beside the general would get that power? It gives the damage boost to both the general and nearby allied cavalry units. Is this the same in ew6:1914? Straussenberg with inf commander doesnt seem to have a damage boost tho |
|
|
|
Post by SolidLight on Jun 12, 2020 9:34:12 GMT
It gives the damage boost to both the general and nearby allied cavalry units. Is this the same in ew6:1914? Straussenberg with inf commander doesnt seem to have a damage boost tho 1914 Aura is WAY weaker than in 1804. First of all, it doesn't stack in 1914. Second, it adds a +20% attack boost instead of +20 base attack. The latter is significantly stronger since it can be affected by a generals damage multiplier while the former just adds to it. I'd say that the aura in 1804 is about twice as strong at the very least. It's also why doing 3 aura infantry generals is a viable strategy in 1804, even if it's not actually very good. I think what might be happening is that he doesn't get the bonus from others since he has it himself, or that the damage boost seems way lower than it is. Wouldn't surprise me since it doesn't actually give +20% attack. More like 17-19%. |
|
