|
Post by Ferlopa on Nov 30, 2020 21:36:12 GMT
So i was thinking about getting MacArthur, but i was wondering if there is a better option as Infantry General of the alliance, what do you think?
|
|
|
Post by Alexyx on Nov 30, 2020 23:18:55 GMT
So i was thinking about getting MacArthur, but i was wondering if there is a better option as Infantry General of the alliance, what do you think? Unless you consider Eisenhower, MacArthur is the best
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Dec 1, 2020 3:58:27 GMT
There are some interesting special forces for Allies... Cossacks as one example. I think this special unit is almost created for MacArthur who already has an increased critical rate and second attack probability.
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Dec 4, 2020 16:10:53 GMT
Does anyone have MacArthur? How good is his "Raider" skill on practice? I mean it is an excellent skill, but Infantry's basic attack is rather low. Is it really worth it? Because otherwise Slim seems to be quite a decent substitute and his price is 300 medals lower...
|
|
|
Post by zabadanov86 on Dec 4, 2020 16:18:36 GMT
Slim looks great, he is immortal☺
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Dec 4, 2020 17:22:04 GMT
Slim looks great, he is immortal☺ He's definitely quite good for Cossacks or Rangers.
|
|
|
Post by zink on Dec 25, 2020 8:40:31 GMT
Does anyone have MacArthur? How good is his "Raider" skill on practice? I mean it is an excellent skill, but Infantry's basic attack is rather low. Is it really worth it? Because otherwise Slim seems to be quite a decent substitute and his price is 300 medals lower... It's best utilized when attacking the troop your special was meant for like anti-tank attacking a tank, the damage will scale tremendously. Also I think % chance skills are best utilized when stacked with other. It's around a 42% chance that either 1 or both activate and allow for extra damage that turn.
|
|
|
Post by Nobunaga Oda on Dec 25, 2020 12:40:46 GMT
Does anyone have MacArthur? How good is his "Raider" skill on practice? I mean it is an excellent skill, but Infantry's basic attack is rather low. Is it really worth it? Because otherwise Slim seems to be quite a decent substitute and his price is 300 medals lower... I think he has a critical hit once every 5-6 turns? That's my impression. And zink made a good point. When he crits while attacking an enemy he is specialised against, the dmg scale up more than a normal critical hit.
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Dec 25, 2020 15:21:27 GMT
Does anyone have MacArthur? How good is his "Raider" skill on practice? I mean it is an excellent skill, but Infantry's basic attack is rather low. Is it really worth it? Because otherwise Slim seems to be quite a decent substitute and his price is 300 medals lower... I think he has a critical hit once every 5-6 turns? That's my impression. And zink made a good point. When he crits while attacking an enemy he is specialised against, the dmg scale up more than a normal critical hit. Assuming the base crit chance is 5%, then MacArthur's chance is almost 5 times higher than Slim. However, I think this will depend on how vulnerable are infantry units in hard campaigns. There's no point of deploying either of them if it only takes the enemy 1 or 2 turns to wipe out a quadruple formation unit.
|
|
|
Post by eeeeef on Dec 25, 2020 15:34:59 GMT
I think he has a critical hit once every 5-6 turns? That's my impression. And zink made a good point. When he crits while attacking an enemy he is specialised against, the dmg scale up more than a normal critical hit. Assuming the base crit chance is 5%, then MacArthur's chance is almost 5 times higher than Slim. However, I think this will depend on how vulnerable are infantry units in hard campaigns. There's no point of deploying either of them if it only takes the enemy 1 or 2 turns to wipe out a quadruple formation unit. I think that there's no chance for a quad Infantry to be wiped in 2 turns unless the player is careless and sends poor macarthur to take on Manstein and his 10 tanks
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Dec 25, 2020 16:02:04 GMT
Assuming the base crit chance is 5%, then MacArthur's chance is almost 5 times higher than Slim. However, I think this will depend on how vulnerable are infantry units in hard campaigns. There's no point of deploying either of them if it only takes the enemy 1 or 2 turns to wipe out a quadruple formation unit. I think that there's no chance for a quad Infantry to be wiped in 2 turns unless the player is careless and sends poor macarthur to take on Manstein and his 10 tanks Or maybe Rommel hits a jackpot and starts a commander party.
|
|
|
Post by eeeeef on Dec 25, 2020 16:13:28 GMT
I think that there's no chance for a quad Infantry to be wiped in 2 turns unless the player is careless and sends poor macarthur to take on Manstein and his 10 tanks Or maybe Rommel hits a jackpot and starts a commander party. Rommel: that's a nice quad stack max NKVD infantry general you have there, it be a shame if someone were to trigger panzer leader 4 times
|
|
|
Post by zink on Dec 25, 2020 18:27:50 GMT
I think that there's no chance for a quad Infantry to be wiped in 2 turns unless the player is careless and sends poor macarthur to take on Manstein and his 10 tanks Or maybe Rommel hits a jackpot and starts a commander party. If there's ever a unit thats scary all ya gotta do is bomb it then bring out Govorov on the pries or katyusha and/or Rokossovsky. I would only send in MacArthur when Rommel is down to one stack.
|
|
|
Post by eeeeef on Dec 25, 2020 18:39:07 GMT
Or maybe Rommel hits a jackpot and starts a commander party. If there's ever a unit thats scary all ya gotta do is bomb it then bring out Govorov on the pries or katyusha and/or Rokossovsky. I would only send in MacArthur when Rommel is down to one stack. Dealing with buff stacked heavy tanks is actually Far easier in the axis since Leeb with elefant can just casually one round it without breaking a sweat and even if Leeb fails to kill there is anti armor Blitzkrieg gooderian ready to let all hell break loose
|
|
|
Post by Shreeyut on Dec 26, 2020 14:29:31 GMT
So i was thinking about getting MacArthur, but i was wondering if there is a better option as Infantry General of the alliance, what do you think? Unless you consider Eisenhower, MacArthur is the best
|
|