|
|
Post by Uranus on Dec 18, 2020 17:25:41 GMT
 Stats:4 tank 3 air 2 artillery 2 speed Abilities:Machinist: regains 50% more health when replenishing armoured or artillery units Panzer Leader: 24% to attack the enemy again after annhilitation. Ace Combat: 80% extra XP when in combat Thoughts:
Definitely a good general with good stats and good enough abilities. There are better options though like Patton. But still good for early game. |
|
|
|
Post by eeeeef on Dec 18, 2020 17:27:27 GMT
Where is the poll?
|
|
|
|
Post by eeeeef on Dec 18, 2020 17:31:25 GMT
Anyway montgomery is definitely the most flexible out of the 3 tank candidates due to ace forces, air stars, and machinist but he definitely loses out to both when on tanks, roko beats him on heavies and patton beats him on medium tanks.
Overall a solid somewhat overpriced general useful in all fronts whether it be at the tanks at Kursk or carriers the coral sea, 4 stars
|
|
|
|
Post by SolidLight on Dec 18, 2020 17:35:33 GMT
He’s basically Rokossovsky, just with air utility and a stronger machinist instead of anti-armor. He also deals 5 more damage against everything else, but this means absolutely nothing since you can kill stacks of artillery and infantry with KV-6 easily either way, and they’re both pretty sucky to use on md tanks too due to no Blitzkrieg.
Overall I like Roko more but Monty isn’t really that bad tbh.
|
|
|
|
Post by eeeeef on Dec 18, 2020 17:35:52 GMT
Also some corrections machinist adds to the hp replenished so you should say +50% same with ace forces except for exp and panzer leader doesn't need you to annihilate an enemy to trigger
|
|
|
|
Post by truhses on Dec 18, 2020 19:06:57 GMT
The worst in skill among the top tankers, only leadership saves him. The only plus is the presence in the campaign headquarters Europe 1939, North Africa and Europe 1944 (high probability). That's why I took it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Uranus on Dec 18, 2020 19:25:46 GMT
Added poll and fixed an issue.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on May 6, 2021 15:30:44 GMT
Behold a pale horse... And a sickly frame. But the beret tops it ff nicely. And death was its rider.
|
|
|
|
Post by Francisco Franco on May 8, 2021 0:52:21 GMT
Quite good
|
|
|
|
Post by Józef Poniatowski on May 8, 2021 14:19:50 GMT
I appreciate Machinist because it allows me to use him behind the frontline, getting absolutely smacked around by enemy units, and still be able to keep him alive.
|
|
|
|
Post by HangryBird on May 8, 2021 18:38:53 GMT
I appreciate Machinist because it allows me to use him behind the frontline, getting absolutely smacked around by enemy units, and still be able to keep him alive. Yeah, Monty's 50% Machinist is very useful. I prefer Monty to Roko mainly because Roko has a 25% Machinist. |
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on May 9, 2021 15:22:38 GMT
He’s basically Rokossovsky, just with air utility and a stronger machinist instead of anti-armor. He also deals 5 more damage against everything else, but this means absolutely nothing since you can kill stacks of artillery and infantry with KV-6 easily either way, and they’re both pretty sucky to use on md tanks too due to no Blitzkrieg. Overall I like Roko more but Monty isn’t really that bad tbh. Perhaps IAP players go with Rokossovsky and non-IAP get Montgomery? Non-IAP Rokossovsky players have to play with 1 fewer general in later scenarios than Montgomery players until they get Patton. |
|
|
|
Post by eeeeef on May 9, 2021 15:38:36 GMT
Anyway montgomery is definitely the most flexible out of the 3 tank candidates due to ace forces, air stars, and machinist but he definitely loses out to both when on tanks, roko beats him on heavies and patton beats him on medium tanks. Overall a solid somewhat overpriced general useful in all fronts whether it be at the tanks at Kursk or carriers the coral sea, 4 stars Oh man looking back at my past opinions are so embarrassing. Updated thoughts: The best KV-6 candidate thanks to panzer leader, machinist, and great stats and all around a must buy unless you prefer Roko. |
|
|
|
Post by Józef Poniatowski on May 9, 2021 18:42:50 GMT
He’s basically Rokossovsky, just with air utility and a stronger machinist instead of anti-armor. He also deals 5 more damage against everything else, but this means absolutely nothing since you can kill stacks of artillery and infantry with KV-6 easily either way, and they’re both pretty sucky to use on md tanks too due to no Blitzkrieg. Overall I like Roko more but Monty isn’t really that bad tbh. Perhaps IAP players go with Rokossovsky and non-IAP get Montgomery? Non-IAP Rokossovsky players have to play with 1 fewer general in later scenarios than Montgomery players until they get Patton. Honestly I use Manstein and Zhukov but I have not yet bought Rokossowski. I find Monty to be enough for me, I got him in 1939 and have yet to need more than 2 tanks. I did get Govorov and Voronov though, I resort to artillery in the later missions over tanks. |
|
|
|
Post by HangryBird on May 9, 2021 19:16:37 GMT
Perhaps IAP players go with Rokossovsky and non-IAP get Montgomery? Non-IAP Rokossovsky players have to play with 1 fewer general in later scenarios than Montgomery players until they get Patton. Honestly I use Manstein and Zhukov but I have not yet bought Rokossowski. I find Monty to be enough for me, I got him in 1939 and have yet to need more than 2 tanks. I did get Govorov and Konev though, I resort to artillery in the later missions over tanks. Konev is really only good in the snow. Chuikov is a free gen and does better in non-snow areas. Unless, you bought Konev for personal reasons. |
|
