|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Aug 8, 2021 17:49:15 GMT
Himmler was largely responsible for Waffen SS being given so much priority. Hauser, for being the person who led it militarily. Very good. How important to the Burmese Front was Lord Louis Mountbatten? |
|
|
|
Post by Shrimant Peshwa Madhavrao Bhat on Aug 9, 2021 2:34:35 GMT
Himmler was largely responsible for Waffen SS being given so much priority. Hauser, for being the person who led it militarily. Very good. How important to the Burmese Front was Lord Louis Mountbatten? After destruction of Japanese carriers at Battle of Midway, Japanese naval activities in Bay of Bengal were largely scaled back, his role was nowhere near as significant as of Archibald Wavell or William Slim. |
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Aug 9, 2021 14:47:17 GMT
Okay, you are qualified. Request to join as specified on page 1.
|
|
|
|
Post by Manfred von Richthofen on Aug 13, 2021 22:19:58 GMT
British morale would be destroyed. And the Germans could have reached Paris a bit more earlier, and lastly, it would have made Battle of Britain successful to the Germans rather than the British. What about the vast British naval superiority? The british navy might have been sunk by German submarines (might be possibility). |
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Aug 13, 2021 23:06:04 GMT
What about the vast British naval superiority? The british navy might have been sunk by German submarines (might be possibility). Explain Further. What would happen in the short term as well as the long term of 3 mos. |
|
|
|
Post by Manfred von Richthofen on Aug 14, 2021 6:14:04 GMT
The british navy might have been sunk by German submarines (might be possibility). Explain Further. What would happen in the short term as well as the long term of 3 mos. In short term, if Operation Dynamo was unsuccessful, Germans would have captured Paris by January-March 1940. In long term, if operation Dynamo was unsuccessful, The British troops evacuated will be at sea, the German navy would have sunk the British Navy, British morale would have been crumbled, Paris been captured by Jan-Mar. 1940, crumbled Allied morale, Battle of Britain a bit earlier and lastly, German morale is boosted. |
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Aug 14, 2021 12:27:44 GMT
Explain Further. What would happen in the short term as well as the long term of 3 mos. In short term, if Operation Dynamo was unsuccessful, Germans would have captured Paris by January-March 1940. In long term, if operation Dynamo was unsuccessful, The British troops evacuated will be at sea, the German navy would have sunk the British Navy, British morale would have been crumbled, Paris been captured by Jan-Mar. 1940, crumbled Allied morale, Battle of Britain a bit earlier and lastly, German morale is boosted. Very good. Second question: what were the pros and cons of General Westmoreland's command style. |
|
|
|
Post by Manfred von Richthofen on Aug 15, 2021 6:01:05 GMT
In short term, if Operation Dynamo was unsuccessful, Germans would have captured Paris by January-March 1940. In long term, if operation Dynamo was unsuccessful, The British troops evacuated will be at sea, the German navy would have sunk the British Navy, British morale would have been crumbled, Paris been captured by Jan-Mar. 1940, crumbled Allied morale, Battle of Britain a bit earlier and lastly, German morale is boosted. Very good. Second question: what were the pros and cons of General Westmoreland's command style. Pros: Westmoreland’s ‘seek and destroy’ strategy was powerful. Cons: His ‘seek and destroy’ strategy wasn’t applicable to the Vietnam war due to Vietnamese troops being camouflaged resulting to many Americans dying (57,000) |
|
|
|
Post by Manfred von Richthofen on Aug 19, 2021 23:58:15 GMT
Very good. Second question: what were the pros and cons of General Westmoreland's command style. Pros: Westmoreland’s ‘seek and destroy’ strategy was powerful. Cons: His ‘seek and destroy’ strategy wasn’t applicable to the Vietnam war due to Vietnamese troops being camouflaged resulting to many Americans dying (57,000) erhm Gerd von Rundstedt why aren't you checking this i have been waiting for a week now |
|
|
|
Post by Voltaire on Aug 21, 2021 21:02:33 GMT
Pros: Westmoreland’s ‘seek and destroy’ strategy was powerful. Cons: His ‘seek and destroy’ strategy wasn’t applicable to the Vietnam war due to Vietnamese troops being camouflaged resulting to many Americans dying (57,000) erhm Gerd von Rundstedt why aren't you checking this i have been waiting for a week now He might not have been online for a while, John Marston might be able to finish it up. |
|
|
|
Post by Manfred von Richthofen on Aug 22, 2021 6:00:57 GMT
Very good. Second question: what were the pros and cons of General Westmoreland's command style. Pros: Westmoreland’s ‘seek and destroy’ strategy was powerful. Cons: His ‘seek and destroy’ strategy wasn’t applicable to the Vietnam war due to Vietnamese troops being camouflaged resulting to many Americans dying (57,000) eh John Marston can you check this since Gerry Gerdy ain’t active |
|
|
|
Post by Shrimant Peshwa Madhavrao Bhat on Aug 22, 2021 6:06:34 GMT
I think this group needs another leader.
|
|
|
|
Post by Kliment Jefremovitš Vorošilov on Aug 22, 2021 7:35:07 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by 𝘛𝘳𝘰𝘵𝘴𝘬𝘺 on Aug 22, 2021 10:56:13 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Voltaire on Aug 22, 2021 17:53:21 GMT
idk, maybe he has gotten busy with other things and just returned to check something |
|
