|
|
Post by TK421 on Jan 24, 2016 19:25:07 GMT
What, exactly, are the best generals in the game?
|
|
|
|
Post by NetherFreek on Jan 24, 2016 19:36:09 GMT
From all:
infantery: Suvorov
Cavalry: Lassalle
Navy: Kate (princess)
From medals:
Infantery: dobbeln
Cavalry: Golitsyn
Navy: Kate (princess)
|
|
|
|
Post by NetherFreek on Jan 24, 2016 19:37:39 GMT
artillery:
Moureau (premium)
Grouchy (medals)
|
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Jan 24, 2016 20:10:44 GMT
Tier-3: Moreau for artillery(high output), Dombrowski for cavalry(high output, Banner), Washington for infantry(damage holder, Leadership), Nelson for navy(leadership&Banner)
Tier-2, power focused: Scharnhorst for artillery, Berthier for cavalry, Oudinot for infantry, Sidney for navy.
Tier-2, economic: Scharnhorst for artillery, Golitsyn for cavalry, Yermolov for infantry(infantry-artillery), Ushakov for navy(navy-artillery).
Tier-1, power focused: Sokolnicki for artillery, Junot/Charles for cavalry, Blasius for infantry, Chichagov/Brueys for navy.
Tier-1, economic: Marmont for artillery, Dumouriez for cavalry, Hull for infantry, Chichagov for navy.
Power focus-only focus on skills, might costs tons of medals.
Economic-care about price and actual use also.
|
|
|
|
Post by wintercastle on Jan 25, 2016 0:02:55 GMT
The best generals are princesses after you add a few stars to them. Isabela, the french general is almost as good as Moreau, though not yet his equal. Victoria, the English princess, rivals Sururov and Lan, the Chinese princess, the second to none in terms of cavalry, much better than Lasalle in my opinion with the leadership skills
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Jan 27, 2016 3:42:35 GMT
Infantry: Either Lannes or Suvorov depending on how you play
Cavalry: Lasalle or Murat same reason applies here
Artillery: Moreau
Navy: Kate
Other good generals are Berthier (if regrouped enough), almost all princesses (looking at you Fatimah), Nelson, and Treville
|
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Jan 27, 2016 3:47:49 GMT
Infantry: Either Lannes or Suvorov depending on how you play Cavalry: Lasalle or Murat same reason applies here Artillery: Moreau Navy: Kate Other good generals are Berthier (if regrouped enough), almost all princesses (looking at you Fatimah), Nelson, and Treville Fatimah is better than Maria. I still use Fatimah. |
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Jan 27, 2016 3:48:44 GMT
Infantry: Either Lannes or Suvorov depending on how you play Cavalry: Lasalle or Murat same reason applies here Artillery: Moreau Navy: Kate Other good generals are Berthier (if regrouped enough), almost all princesses (looking at you Fatimah), Nelson, and Treville Fatimah is better than Maria. I still use Fatimah. Oh yeah, I forgot about Maria. And no comment about me saying that Lannes is on the same (high) level as Suvorov? |
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Jan 27, 2016 3:50:18 GMT
Fatimah is better than Maria. I still use Fatimah. Oh yeah, I forgot about Maria. And no comment about me saying that Lannes is on the same (high) level as Suvorov? And start this petty squabble again? No. |
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Jan 27, 2016 3:52:58 GMT
Oh yeah, I forgot about Maria. And no comment about me saying that Lannes is on the same (high) level as Suvorov? And start this petty squabble again? No. Great, me neither. Back to best generals: something that alot of people don't meniton about Suvorov is that he can upgrade his troops to level 5 from start. This can be useful if you need a little health boost |
|
|
|
Post by wintercastle on Jan 31, 2016 14:43:23 GMT
And start this petty squabble again? No. Great, me neither. Back to best generals: something that alot of people don't meniton about Suvorov is that he can upgrade his troops to level 5 from start. This can be useful if you need a little health boost That's also what's good about Victoria and Lan, both of them have this capability and adds some more flexability to your gameplay. Especially for Lan, who can kill off 5 enemy, get an upgrade in level from the damage dealt and then you can upgrade him again to greatly increase her health. It makes them both last much longer in battle. |
|
|
|
Post by wintercastle on Jan 31, 2016 15:00:48 GMT
I believe Lan is a better cavalry general to either Lasalle or Murat, especially in quite specific cases. I can't deny Murat is best against forts among all 3 but it is also quite clear he is worse in all other aspects.
As for comparing Lasalle and Lan, both of them have same first 2 skills. Lasalle has mobility which only rises attack slightly while Lan has attack art which is inconsistent so i would rate both skills similarly. However, Lasalle's last skill is sailor which only helps in a very specific case, when he is commanding horse on water and you don't see that very often at all. You can also use amoured carrier to neglect the affect of this skill completely. Lan's last skill is leadership which in my opinion is probably the single most important skill for a cavalry general. Commanding cavalry which can attack multiple times but only move once per turn, it is best to get into a crowd of enemy and kill them off within a single turn. That means you might need to get yourself surrounded and leadership means you can still deal full damage at that time. Plus, leadership is also a slight boast in health as enemy cannot deal extra damage to you when they surround or demolarize you in any way. Not to mention Lasalle can only upgrade once and Murat twice while Lan have 5 stars in upgrade.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Jan 31, 2016 16:19:12 GMT
Great, me neither. Back to best generals: something that alot of people don't meniton about Suvorov is that he can upgrade his troops to level 5 from start. This can be useful if you need a little health boost That's also what's good about Victoria and Lan, both of them have this capability and adds some more flexability to your gameplay. Especially for Lan, who can kill off 5 enemy, get an upgrade in level from the damage dealt and then you can upgrade him again to greatly increase her health. It makes them both last much longer in battle. Every time I get Kate (I think she can upgrade to rank 4) the first two turns I upgrade her health |
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Jan 31, 2016 16:20:12 GMT
I believe Lan is a better cavalry general to either Lasalle or Murat, especially in quite specific cases. I can't deny Murat is best against forts among all 3 but it is also quite clear he is worse in all other aspects. As for comparing Lasalle and Lan, both of them have same first 2 skills. Lasalle has mobility which only rises attack slightly while Lan has attack art which is inconsistent so i would rate both skills similarly. However, Lasalle's last skill is sailor which only helps in a very specific case, when he is commanding horse on water and you don't see that very often at all. You can also use amoured carrier to neglect the affect of this skill completely. Lan's last skill is leadership which in my opinion is probably the single most important skill for a cavalry general. Commanding cavalry which can attack multiple times but only move once per turn, it is best to get into a crowd of enemy and kill them off within a single turn. That means you might need to get yourself surrounded and leadership means you can still deal full damage at that time. Plus, leadership is also a slight boast in health as enemy cannot deal extra damage to you when they surround or demolarize you in any way. Not to mention Lasalle can only upgrade once and Murat twice while Lan have 5 stars in upgrade. But doesn't Lan have less stars than the other two at first? If so then it's the Berthier Case. You have a general with great skills but (compared to others) bad stars |
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Jan 31, 2016 16:29:49 GMT
I believe Lan is a better cavalry general to either Lasalle or Murat, especially in quite specific cases. I can't deny Murat is best against forts among all 3 but it is also quite clear he is worse in all other aspects. As for comparing Lasalle and Lan, both of them have same first 2 skills. Lasalle has mobility which only rises attack slightly while Lan has attack art which is inconsistent so i would rate both skills similarly. However, Lasalle's last skill is sailor which only helps in a very specific case, when he is commanding horse on water and you don't see that very often at all. You can also use amoured carrier to neglect the affect of this skill completely. Lan's last skill is leadership which in my opinion is probably the single most important skill for a cavalry general. Commanding cavalry which can attack multiple times but only move once per turn, it is best to get into a crowd of enemy and kill them off within a single turn. That means you might need to get yourself surrounded and leadership means you can still deal full damage at that time. Plus, leadership is also a slight boast in health as enemy cannot deal extra damage to you when they surround or demolarize you in any way. Not to mention Lasalle can only upgrade once and Murat twice while Lan have 5 stars in upgrade. But doesn't Lan have less stars than the other two at first? If so then it's the Berthier Case. You have a general with great skills but (compared to others) bad stars He means that Lan has 5 stars in training. So you can restore her health 5 times. During a battle. |
|
