|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Jan 31, 2016 16:33:38 GMT
But doesn't Lan have less stars than the other two at first? If so then it's the Berthier Case. You have a general with great skills but (compared to others) bad stars He means that Lan has 5 stars in training. So you can restore her health 5 times. During a battle. Oh, yes I did understand that but when you first get her doesn't she have less than 5 stars in cavalry? |
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Jan 31, 2016 16:46:28 GMT
He means that Lan has 5 stars in training. So you can restore her health 5 times. During a battle. Oh, yes I did understand that but when you first get her doesn't she have less than 5 stars in cavalry? Uuhhhhhhh I have no idea. If she doesn't have 5 she must have 4. |
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Jan 31, 2016 16:49:54 GMT
Oh, yes I did understand that but when you first get her doesn't she have less than 5 stars in cavalry? Uuhhhhhhh I have no idea. If she doesn't have 5 she must have 4. I think she had 3 stars and I don't forget movement either. Upgrading her stars to Lasalle level (which are already perfect at purchase. Will cost a ton of medals |
|
|
|
Post by wintercastle on Jan 31, 2016 22:59:15 GMT
But doesn't Lan have less stars than the other two at first? If so then it's the Berthier Case. You have a general with great skills but (compared to others) bad stars He means that Lan has 5 stars in training. So you can restore her health 5 times. During a battle. Lan does have worse stars in cavalry when she starts, but i'd say much better skills. If you guys would consider picking Lannes, someone with quite a bit worse attack and a useless geography skill over someone else like Sururov, you should be able to see the might of the skill Leadership. If it is THAT important in an infantry general, it should be three times as important in a cavalry general who needs to do multiple attacks. I can't say if a 3 star Lan would be as good as Lasalle or Murat but at 4 star, she should already be their equal and at 5 stars, much better. Plus, it's not like she needs nearly as much upgrades as Berthier, With originally 3 stars in cavalry, she only needs 2 more and maybe one in movement and that's it. She's also got quite a lot of economy stars if you want to trade. |
|
|
|
Post by kanue on Feb 1, 2016 14:18:39 GMT
I can grind for 3000 medals but not 6 emblems.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Feb 2, 2016 4:13:43 GMT
I can grind for 3000 medals but not 6 emblems. If this is who's the best general overall then Lan. Who's better at purchase? Lasalle all the way |
|
|
|
Post by wintercastle on Feb 2, 2016 5:12:14 GMT
I can grind for 3000 medals but not 6 emblems. If this is who's the best general overall then Lan. Who's better at purchase? Lasalle all the way |
|
|
|
Post by FEGELIEN on Feb 8, 2016 23:36:59 GMT
I have around 650 medals and i want to buy a good general for artilery i will get around 900 in a week so who shloud i buy?
|
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Feb 8, 2016 23:51:52 GMT
I have around 650 medals and i want to buy a good general for artilery i will get around 900 in a week so who shloud i buy? When you get the medals, Scharnhorst or Grouchy probably. Sophia is a free artillery general who is better than both. Isabela is 2nd best in the game, so with Sophia and Scharnhorst or Grouchy you can get Isabela and be set with artillery forever |
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Feb 9, 2016 0:39:34 GMT
I have around 650 medals and i want to buy a good general for artilery i will get around 900 in a week so who shloud i buy? Go get Scharnhorst, he is the strongest artillery general in tier-2 and under. If you want a pretty cheap one and going to regroup him to princess soon, you can choose Kutaisov. |
|
|
|
Post by jackal3453 on Feb 9, 2016 21:39:06 GMT
Choices, choices!! The one empty is my Berthier  |
|
|
|
Post by jackal3453 on Feb 9, 2016 21:43:56 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by wintercastle on Feb 10, 2016 4:43:38 GMT
|
|
