|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 24, 2021 18:31:11 GMT
Also how is Malinovsky not here? SO OVERATED, bad skills, bad output, Bad everythng yet people say he is better than Vasilevsky.
|
|
|
|
Post by eeeeef on Mar 24, 2021 18:32:46 GMT
Also how is Malinovsky not here? SO OVERATED, bad skills, bad output, Bad everythng yet people say he is better than Vasilevsky. I'm surprised you're defending vasilevsky here since he supposedly "shut down" your first run. |
|
|
|
Post by zink on Mar 24, 2021 18:34:50 GMT
Also how is Malinovsky not here? SO OVERATED, bad skills, bad output, Bad everythng yet people say he is better than Vasilevsky. Price tag |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 24, 2021 18:40:40 GMT
Also how is Malinovsky not here? SO OVERATED, bad skills, bad output, Bad everythng yet people say he is better than Vasilevsky. I'm surprised you're defending vasilevsky here since he supposedly "shut down" your first run. I am by no means defending Vasilevskiy(who also should be here). I just think people(mainly Fried Rice) hype up a mediocre inf gen WAY TO MUCH. Want a cheap, good output inf gen? get Clark or Bradley or Konev or SLIM |
|
|
|
Post by HangryBird on Mar 24, 2021 18:46:19 GMT
I voted for MacArthur, Roko and Monty personally. These are my personal reasonings why they are the most over-rated. Monty is overrated cause he is in actual fact terrible. He is expensive and has 2 useless skills. Roko is a tad overrated because you would use Patton for Mediums and Vatutin for Heavies. Both Patton and Vatutin output on their tanks are just better. Also Vatutin on the KV6 one-shots infantry in 45 (with lvl6 + max KV6) and Roko cannot and he has Anti-Armor to cover for non-infantry so yes, like others have said, weapon of Mass Destruction. I think MacArthur is the best Infantry General. But I think he is a tad over-rated for the fact that everyone on this board thinks you need him to perfect clear the Allies campaign and I had no problems with using Vasilevsky. Monty has one useless skill, Roko is, yeah, Inferior to anyone, and when I say MacArthur is necessary, I am using hyperbolic speech. I don't actually think that MacArthur is necessary. Just ask HangryBird . Ask me what? |
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Mar 24, 2021 18:46:54 GMT
I'm surprised you're defending vasilevsky here since he supposedly "shut down" your first run. I am by no means defending Vasilevskiy(who also should be here). I just think people(mainly Fried Rice) hype up a mediocre inf gen WAY TO MUCH. Want a cheap, good output inf gen? get Clark or Bradley or Konev or SLIM Do you understand what "cheap" means? He is by no means better than Vasilevsky, but he is the Spruance of Infantry. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 24, 2021 18:47:43 GMT
I am by no means defending Vasilevskiy(who also should be here). I just think people(mainly Fried Rice) hype up a mediocre inf gen WAY TO MUCH. Want a cheap, good output inf gen? get Clark or Bradley or Konev or SLIM Do you understand what "cheap" means? He is by no means better than Vasilevsky, but he is the Spruance of Infantry. Wouldn't Slim be the Spraunce of Infantry? |
|
|
|
Post by eeeeef on Mar 24, 2021 18:48:07 GMT
Do you understand what "cheap" means? He is by no means better than Vasilevsky, but he is the Spruance of Infantry. Wouldn't Slim be the Spraunce of Infantry? Not even close bucko. |
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Mar 24, 2021 18:48:14 GMT
Monty has one useless skill, Roko is, yeah, Inferior to anyone, and when I say MacArthur is necessary, I am using hyperbolic speech. I don't actually think that MacArthur is necessary. Just ask HangryBird . Ask me what? I mean you of all people know MacArthur isn't necessary. |
|
|
|
Post by HangryBird on Mar 24, 2021 18:48:23 GMT
Also how is Malinovsky not here? SO OVERATED, bad skills, bad output, Bad everythng yet people say he is better than Vasilevsky. I'm surprised you're defending vasilevsky here since he supposedly "shut down" your first run. Although I think Vasilevsky sucks, at least he is end game material, unlike Malinovsky. |
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Mar 24, 2021 18:48:55 GMT
Do you understand what "cheap" means? He is by no means better than Vasilevsky, but he is the Spruance of Infantry. Wouldn't Slim be the Spraunce of Infantry? Slim is the Mountbatten of Infantry. |
|
|
|
Post by zink on Mar 24, 2021 18:49:00 GMT
I'm surprised you're defending vasilevsky here since he supposedly "shut down" your first run. I am by no means defending Vasilevskiy(who also should be here). I just think people(mainly Fried Rice) hype up a mediocre inf gen WAY TO MUCH. Want a cheap, good output inf gen? get Clark or Bradley or Konev or SLIM Bruh Konev, I'd put Tassigny up there |
|
|
|
Post by HangryBird on Mar 24, 2021 18:49:31 GMT
Do you understand what "cheap" means? He is by no means better than Vasilevsky, but he is the Spruance of Infantry. Wouldn't Slim be the Spraunce of Infantry? No, because Slim is endgame material, Spraunce is not. |
|
|
|
Post by zink on Mar 24, 2021 18:50:48 GMT
I mean you of all people know MacArthur isn't necessary. Yeah well, Rundstedt isn't necessaary! |
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Mar 24, 2021 18:52:01 GMT
I mean you of all people know MacArthur isn't necessary. Yeah well, Rundstedt isn't necessaary! Of course he isn't! No general is necessary. |
|
